Rahimi, Lutfi (2015): Does microfinance elevate poverty? Does family size matter in the provision of microcredit? Evidence from a randomised evaluation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_73906.pdf Download (250kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper looks at randomised assessment of microcredit intervention through Spandana in Hyderabad, India. It looks at households with six or more than six members as a restricting conditioning to see whether provision of microcredit affects them differently. This paper finds significant differences in the way which smaller and bigger families allocate their additional resource received in the form of microcredit intervention. As stated above, bigger households spend more on durable goods as soon as they received a loan whereas smaller households do not emphasis on increasing household stocks. These results are revealing on how different households prioritise their expenditure categories and thus may serve as a guide to microcredit institutions on how to provide tailored credit packages. Likewise, intuitively bigger households had higher borrowing levels compared to smaller households . Furthermore, this paper concludes that smaller households increase their borrowing from banks and informal sources as well. The reasons behind this contrast maybe due to unconsidered factors in this study such as existing family businesses, household preferences or loan provider criteria.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does microfinance elevate poverty? Does family size matter in the provision of microcredit? Evidence from a randomised evaluation |
English Title: | Does microfinance elevate poverty? Does family size matter in the provision of microcredit? Evidence from a randomised evaluation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Keywords: microfinance, microcredit, poverty elevation, family size |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages |
Item ID: | 73906 |
Depositing User: | Mr Lutfi Rahimi |
Date Deposited: | 24 Sep 2016 10:51 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 03:05 |
References: | Aghion, D., Armendariz, B., & Gollier, C. (2000). Peer group formation in an adverse selection model. The Economic Journal, 110(465), 632-643. Angelucci, M., Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2013). Win some lose some? Evidence from a randomized microcredit program placement experiment by Compartamos Banco (No. w19119). National Bureau of Economic Research. Aportela, F. (1999). Effects of financial access on savings by low-income people. MIT, mimeo.i Armendáriz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). The economics of microfinance. MIT press. Attanasio, O., Augsburg, B., De Haas, R., Fitzsimons, E., & Harmgart, H. (2014). Group lending or individual lending? Evidence from a randomised field experiment in Mongolia (No. SP II 2014-303). Discussion Paper, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Abteilung Ökonomik des Wandels: Schwerpunkt Markt und Entscheidung. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kinnan, C. G. (2013). The miracle of microfinance? Evidence from a randomized evaluation (No. w18950). National Bureau of Economic Research. Berenbach, S., & Guzman, D. (1994). The Solidarity Group Experience Worldwide. In E. Rhyne. The New World of Mircoenterprise Finance: Building Healthy Financial Institutions for the Poor. Besley, T., Coate, S., & Loury, G. (1993). The economics of rotating savings and credit associations. The American Economic Review, 792-810. Bolton, P., & Scharfstein, D. S. (1990). A theory of predation based on agency problems in financial contracting. The American Economic Review, 93-106. Chambers, R. (1997). Whose reality counts?: putting the first last. Intermediate Technology Publications Ltd (ITP). Cohen, M., Chen, M. A., & Dunn, E. (1996). Household economic portfolios. More info www.eldis.org/vfile/upload/1/document/0708/DOC2932.Pdf/ ,(18 November 2010). Crépon, B., Devoto, F., Duflo, E., & Parienté, W. (2014). Impact of microcredit in rural areas of Morocco: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. De Mel, S., McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2008). Returns to capital in microenterprises: evidence from a field experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(4), 1329-1372. De Mel, S. McKenzie, D., & Woodruff, C. (2009). Are women more credit constrained? Experimental evidence on gender and microenterprise returns.American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 1-32. Ghatak, M., & Guinnane, T. W. (1999). The economics of lending with joint liability: theory and practice. Journal of development economics, 60(1), 195-228. Ghatak, M. (1999). Group lending, local information and peer selection. Journal of development Economics, 60(1), 27-50. Grootaert, C., & Van Bastelaer, T. (2001). Understanding and measuring social capital: A synthesis of findings and recommendations from the social capital initiative. Social Capital Initiative Working Paper, (24). Harper, M. (2002). Self-help groups and Grameen Bank groups: What are the differences? Beyond micro-credit: Putting development back into micro-finance. New Delhi: Vistaar. Holt, S. L. (1994). The Village Bank Methodology: Performance and Prospects. In. E. Rhyne. The New World of Mircoenterprise Finance: Building Healthy Financial Institutions for the Poor. Hossain, D. M. (2013). Social Capital and Microfinance: The Case of Grameen Bank, Bangladesh. Middle East Journal of Business, 8(4). Kaboski, J. P., & Townsend, R. M. (2011). A Structural Evaluation of a Large‐Scale Quasi‐Experimental Microfinance Initiative. Econometrica, 79(5), 1357-1406. Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2010). Expanding credit access: Using randomized supply decisions to estimate the impacts. Review of Financial Studies, 23(1), 433-464. Karlan, D., & Zinman, J. (2011). Microcredit in theory and practice: Using randomized credit scoring for impact evaluation. Science, 332(6035), 1278-1284. Ledgerwood, J., Earne, J., & Nelson, C. (Eds.). (2013). The New Microfinance Handbook: A financial market system perspective. World Bank Publications. Ledgerwood, J. (1999). Sustainable banking with the poor microfinance handbook. Hulme, D. (2000). Impact assessment methodologies for microfinance: Theory, experience and better practice. World development, 28(1), 79-98. Hulme, D., & Mosley, P. (Eds.) (1996). The Impact on Production and Technology. Finance against poverty (Vol. 2) Psychology Press. Morduch, J. (2000). The microfinance schism. World development, 28(4), 617-629. Morduch, J. (1999). The microfinance promise. Journal of economic literature, 1569-1614 Sebstad, J., Neil, C., Barnes, C. & Chen, G. (1995). Assessing the Impacts of Microenterprise Interventions: A Framework for Analysis. USAID Managing for Results, Working Paper No. 7. Washington, D.C.: USAID. Schreiner, M., & Colombet, H. H. (2001). From urban to rural: Lessons for microfinance from Argentina. Development policy review, 19(3), 339-354. Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American economic review, 393-410. Twisk, J. W., & de Vente, W. (2008). The analysis of randomised controlled trial data with more than one follow-up measurement. A comparison between different approaches. European journal of epidemiology, 23(10), 655-660. Wenner, M., 1995, Group credit: A means to improve information transfer and loan repayment performance, Journal of Development Studies 32, 263-281. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/73906 |