Izu, Akhenaton (2016): Analyse de la robustesse et de la vulnérabilité à la pauvreté en RDC. Published in: Jeune Economiste , Vol. 26, No. 23 (30 September 2016): pp. 21-43.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_74749.pdf Download (978kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The major concern for this paper is to show that in spite of the fall of the incidence of poverty between 2005 and 2012, the households remain candidates with poverty in the future following their great vulnerability. The analysis of the robustness of poverty and the vulnerability to poverty required the confrontation of several approaches of the wellbeing. It follows of these approaches which as well rural households as the urban households are prone to a strong vulnerability with poverty: in rural environment, the borrowing rate of poverty is established to 47,3%, the rate of entry rises to 52,75% while the borrowing rate of poverty is established to 51,85% and the rate of entry rises to 50,5% in urban environment. The rural households are slightly more vulnerable to poverty than the urban households and the poverty of the households forwards from generation to generation and does not result from the isolated events, it is thus chronic.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Analyse de la robustesse et de la vulnérabilité à la pauvreté en RDC |
English Title: | Analysis of the robustness and the vulnerability to poverty in DRC |
Language: | French |
Keywords: | Vulnerability, Chronic poverty, Inequalities |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty |
Item ID: | 74749 |
Depositing User: | Izu Makongo Akhenaton |
Date Deposited: | 26 Oct 2016 04:18 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 07:33 |
References: | Abdallah A. et Amouzouvi K. (2007), Profil de la pauvreté et de la vulnérabilité au Togo, version 1, PNUD. Ali I. (2007), « Pro-Poor to Inclusive Growth: Asian Prescriptions », ERD Policy Brief, n° 48, mai; Manille, Banque asiatique de développement. Alofa J, Manlan O. et Vodounou C. (2011), Politiques de croissance pro-pauvre : Contraintes et défis au Bénin, PNUD. Anand R, Mishra S. et Peiris J. (2013), Inclusive Growth: Measurement and Determinants, IMF Working Paper WP/13/135. Atkinson A.B. (1987), “On the Measurement of Poverty”, Econometrica, vol. 55, n°4, pp. 749-764. Bonkoungou M. et Koné M. (2002), Etude sur les risques sociaux et la vulnérabilité au Burkina Faso, Ouagadougou. Clément M. (2005), Dynamiques de pauvreté, trajectoires de bien-être et transferts publics ; le cas de la Russie. Thèse de Doctorat ès Sciences Economiques, Université Montesquieu-Bordeaux IV. Coudouel, A., J.S. Hentschel and Q.T. Wodon (2002), « Poverty Measurement and Analysis », World Bank, (April 2002), MPRA Paper No. 10490, 79p Daouda Y.H. (2010), Dynamiques de pauvreté, inégalité et croissance économique en Afrique Subsaharienne: une investigation appliquée au cas du Niger, Université Montesquieu - Bordeaux IV. Duclos J.-Y. et Araar A. (2006), Poverty and Equity: Measurement, Policy and Estimation with DAD, Published by Springer & International Development Research. Ezzrari A. (2011), La pauvreté au Maroc : approches, déterminants, dynamique et stratégies de réduction, Thèse de doctorat ès sciences économiques, UNIVERSITE HASSAN II AIN CHOCK. Izu A. (2016), Fort de sa vigueur, qu’en est-il de l’inclusivité de la croissance en RDC ? Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/68868. Jalan, J. et Ravallion M. (1996), “Transient Poverty in Rural China”, Policy Research Working Paper, n° 1616, World Bank. Kakwani N. (1990), « Test de Signifiance des Différences de Pauvreté: avec application à la Côte d'Ivoire, Etude sur la mesure des niveaux de vie », Document de travail n° 62, Banque mondiale, Washington, D.C., 28 p. Klasen, S. (2010), « Measuring and Monitoring Inclusive Growth: Multiple Definitions, Open Questions, and Some Constructive Proposals », ADB Sustainable Development Working Paper Series, n° 12, juin KOBOBE O. (2010), Analyse comparative de la pauvreté dans des agglomérations de l’UEMOA (Abidjan, Bissau, Niamey et Lomé): lien entre pauvreté et marche du travail, AFRISTAT. Mavila L. (2010), Croissance pro-pauvres comme voie de réalisation des OMD en RDC, Mémoire de Licence, Faculté des Sciences Economiques et de Gestion, Université de Kinshasa. Quirk, J. P. et Saposnik, R. (1962), “Admissibility and Measurable Utility Functions”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 29, pp. 140-146. Ravallion M. (1988), “Expected Poverty under Risk-Induced Welfare Variability”, The Economic Journal, vol. 98, n°393, pp. 1171-1182. Ravallion M. (1992), Poverty Comparaisons, A Guid to Concepts and Method, LSMS, Working Paper n° 88. Razafindra J. (2007), Pauvreté et distribution des services sociaux à Madagascar, Thèse de Doctorat en Economie, UNIVERSITE D’ANTANANARIVO. Rousseau S. (2001) : « Capabilités, risques et vulnérabilités », in Pauvreté et développement socialement durable, Dubois J-J., Lachaud J-P, Montaud J-M., Pouille A. (eds), PUB, Bordeaux, pp. 11-22. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/74749 |