Manjhi, Ganesh and Keswani Mehra, Meeta (2016): Center-State Political Transfer Cycles in India.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_75078.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Using the Arellano-Bond dynamic panel-data estimation methods (GMM) for a balanced panel data from 1980-2010 for 14 Indian states, we try to find whether the election affects the individual components of transfers from the centre to the states, namely, grants from the centre, loan from the centre, and tax devolution. We also attempt to examine if different transfer variables and other politico-economic characteristics of the country are able to create the possibility of retaining the political power for the incumbent. We find that the right wing and coalition governments are less likely to transfer resources to the states. However, the state level ruling party, which is either the same party at the centre or an ally, tends to get higher transfers from the centre than a non-allied one. Similar to the pre-election political budget cycles found in the existing literature (Drazen and Eslava, 2010, Aidt, Veiga and Veiga, 2011, Klomp and Hahn, 2013, Chortareas, Logothetis and Papandreou, 2016), the political transfer cycle (PTC) is visible one year before the election in the case of grants from the centre and loan from the centre but not in the case of tax devolution. The paper is also extended to a binary Logit specification to test for the incumbent’s probability of winning the election. We find that grants and loans are likely to have varied impacts on an election win depending on the timing. Opportunistic grants in the year before the election are likely to help win the election whereas a loan punishes the incumbent. Instead, opportunistic manipulations in grants and loan in the year of election help the incumbent retain political power. Further, it is found that a higher voters’ turnout in the state is more likely to win the election, inflation reduces the possibility of the win, and a more experienced government has a higher probability of a win. Moreover, our results also show that the right wing government is more likely to win the election.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Center-State Political Transfer Cycles in India |
English Title: | Center-State Political Transfer Cycles in India |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Opportunist Incumbent; Political Budget Cycle, Political Transfer Cycle, Indian Federation |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations |
Item ID: | 75078 |
Depositing User: | Ganesh Manjhi |
Date Deposited: | 15 Nov 2016 10:38 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 06:49 |
References: | Aidt, T. S., Veiga, F. J. and L.G. Veiga.(2011). “Election Results and Opportunistic Policies: A new test of the rational political Business Cycle model”, Public Choice, 148: 21-44. Alesina, A., and M. Paridisi. (2014). “Political Budget Cycles: Evidence from the Italian Cities”, NBER Working Paper 20570. Alesina, A., Roubini, N. and G. D. Cohen. (1997). “Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy”, Cambridge: MIT Press. Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991). “Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 58, pp. 277–297. Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995), “Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models.”, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 68, pp. 29–51. Arulumpalam, W., Dasgupta, S, Dhillon, A and B. Dutta. (2009), “Electoral goals and center-state transfers: A theoretical model and empirical evidence from India”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 88, pp. 103-119 Bagchi, A. (2003), “Rethinking Federalism: Changing Power Relations between the centre and and the States”, Publius, Vol. 33, No.04, Emerging Federal Process in India, pp.21-42. Baltagi, B.H., (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. fourth ed. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK; Hoboken, NJ. Baskaran, T., Brender, A., Blesse, S. and Reingewertz, Y. (2016). “Revenue Decentralisation, central oversight and the Political Budget Cycle: Evidence from the Israel”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 42, pp.1-16 Biswas, R, and Marjit, S. (2000). “Political Lobbying and Discretionary Finance in India: An Aspect of Regional Political Influence in a Representative Democracy”, Working Paper, Centre for Studies in Social Sciences, Calcutta. Blundell, R., Bond, S., 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J. Econometrics, Vol. 87, pp.115–143. Brender, A. and Drazen, A. (2005). “Political Budget Cycles in New versus Established Democracies.” NBER Working Paper 10539 Brender, A. and Drazen, A. (2013). “Elections, Leaders, and the Composition of Government Spending”, Journal of Public Economics, Vo. 97, Issue-1, pp. 18-31 Brug, W., Eijk, C. and Franklin, M. (2007), “The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries”. Cambridge University Press. Chakraborty, P. (2003). “Unequal Fiscal Capacities Across India States: How Corrective is the Fiscal Transfer Mechanism?” National Institute of Public Finance and Policy, mimeo Chortareas, G., V. Logothetis and Papandreou, A. A. (2016). “Political budget cycles and reelection prospects in Greece's municipalities”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 43, pp. 1-13. Cukierman, A. and Meltzer, A.H.(1986). “A Positive Theory of Discretionary Policy, the Cost of Democratic Government and the Benefits of the Constitution”, Economic Enquiry, Vol. XXIV. Dasgupta, S., Dhillon, A and Dutta, B. (2003). “Electoral Goals and Centre-State Transfers: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Evidence from India”. New Delhi: Indian Statistical Institute. Dixit, A. and Londregan, J. (1995), “Redistributive Politics and Economic Efficiency.”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 89, pp. 856-866. Dixit, A. and Londregan, J. (1996), “The Determinants of Success in Redistributive Politics.”, Journal of Politics, Vol. 58, pp.1132-1155. Dixit, A. and Londregan, J. (1998a), “Ideology, Tactics and Efficiency in Politics.”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 113, pp. 497-529 Dixit, A. and Londregan, J. (1998b), “Fiscal Federalism and Distributive Politics.”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 68, pp. 153-180. Drazen, A., (2000). “The Political Business Cycle after 25 Years”, Ben S. Bernanke and Kenneth Rogoff (eds.), NBER Macroeconomic Annual 2000, MIT Press, Volume 15, 75-138. Drazen, A. and Eslava, M. (2010). “Electoral manipulation via expenditure composition: theory and evidence”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 92, pp. 39-52. Dutta, B. and Gupta, P. (2014), “How Indian Voters Respond to Candidates with Criminal Charges Evidence from 2009 Lok Sabha Elections”, Vol. XLIX, No. 04, pp. 43-51. Efthyvoulou, G. (2012), “Political Budget Cycles in the European Union and the impact of political pressures”, Public Choice, Vol. 153, pp. 295-327. Frey, B. S. and Schneider, F. (1978). “A Politico-Economic Model of the United Kingdom”, The Economic Journal, Vol. 80, No. 350, pp. 243-253. George, K.K. and Gulati, I. S. (1985a), “Central Inroads into States subjects”, Economics and Political Weekly, April 6, 1985. George, K.K. and Gulati, I. S. (1985b), “Central-state Resource Transfers, 1951-84- An Appraisal”, Economics and Political Weekly, February 16, 1985. Green, W. (2003), “Econometric Analysis”, Pearson Publication Grofman, Bernard, Guillermo Owen, and Christian Collet (1999)., ”Rethinking the Partisan Effects of Higher Turnout: So What’s the Question?”, Public Choice, Vol. 99 (June), pp. 357-376. Gulati, I.S. and George, K. K. (1978), “Inter-state re-distribution through budgetary transfers ”, Economic and Political Weekly, Special Number August, 1978. Gupta, P. and Panagariya, A (2014), “Growth and Election Outcome in a Developing Country”, Economics and Politics, Vol. 26, 'No. 02, pp. 332-354 Hansford, T.G and Gomez, B.T. (2010), “Estimating the Electoral Effects of Voter Turnout”, American Politcal Science Review, Vol. 104, No.2, pp.268-288. Hibbs, D. (1977). “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy”, American Political Science Review. Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 1467-1487. Iyer, S., and Shrivastava, A. (2015), “Rligious Right and Electoral Politics in India”, Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, CWPE 1536. Inman, Robert P. and Rubinfeld Daniel L. (1997). “The political economy of federalism”. In Perspectives on Public Choice :A Handbook, ed. Dennis C. Mueller, 73-105. Cambridge, U.K. and New York: Cambridge University Press Khemani, S. (2004). “Political Cycles in a Developing Economy: Effect of Elections in the Indian States”, Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 73, pp. 125-154. Kiviet, J.F. (1995). On bias, inconsistency, and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, Vo. 68, pp. 53–78. Klomp, J and J. de Haan (2013), “Political budget cycle and election outcomes”, Public Choice, Vol. 157, pp. 245-s267. Kneebone, R. and McKenzie, K. (2001). “Electoral and Partisan Cycles in Fiscal Policy: An Examination of Canadian Provinces,” International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 8, pp. 753-774. Kroth, V. (2012), Political budget cycles and intergovernmental transfers in a dominant party framework: empirical evidence from South Africa, Political Science and Political Economy Working Paper, Department of Economics, London School of Economics, No. 6/2012. Lindbeck, A. and Weibull, J. (1987), “Balanced-Budget Redistribution as the Outcome of Political Competition.”, Public Choice”, Vol. 52, pp. 273-297. Manjhi, G and Mehra, M. K. (2016), “Dynamics of Political Budget Cycle”, NIPFP Working Paper, no. 163. Mourao, P and Veiga, L.G. (2010), “Elections, Fiscal Policy and Fiscal Illusions”, NIPE, WP 18/2010. Nickell, S.J. (1981). “Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects”, Econometrica, Vol. 49, pp. 1417–1426. Nordhaus, W. (1975). “The Political Business Cycle,” Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 42, pp. 169-90. Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1990), Macroeconomic Policy, Credibility and Politics, London: Harwood Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2000). “Political Economics, Explaining Economic Policy, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2003), “Do Electoral Cycles differ across Political Systems?”, CEPR Working Paper Series, No. 232. Rao, M.G. and N. Singh, (2001), “The Political Economy of Center-State Fiscal Transfers in India”, Working Paper No. 107, Stanford Center for International Development Rao, M.G. and N. Singh, (1998), “An analysis of Explicit and Implicit Intergovernmental Transfers in India.” University of California at Santa Cruz, mimeo. Rao, M.G. and N. Singh, (2007), “The Political Economy of India’s Fiscal Federal System and its Reform”, Publius, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 26-44. Reid, B. G. (1998), “Endogenous elections, electoral budget cycles and Canadian provincial governments”, Public Choice, Vol. 97, Issue 1-2, pp 35-48. Rogoff, K. (1990), “Equilibrium political budget cycles”, American Economic Review, Vol. 80, pp. 21–36. Rogoff, K. and A. Sibert (1988), “Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles”, Review of Economics Studies, Vol. 55, pp. 1–16. Roodman, D., 2009a. How to do xtabond2: an introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. Stata Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 86–136. Roodman, D., 2009b. A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 71, pp. 135–158. Rudolph, L.I., and Rudolph, S. H. (2001). “Iconisation of Chandrababu: Sharing sovereignty in India's federal market economy”, Economic and Political Weekly, 36, May 5, 1541-1552. Sengupta, B. (2011). “Provision of public goods in a federal economy: The role of Party Politics”, European Journal of Political Economy, Vo. 27, pp. 104-119. Sengupta, B. (2015). “Endogenous Leadership in a Federal Transfer Game”, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2782338 Shi, M. and Svensson, J. (2002a). “Political budget cycles in developed and developing countries” (mimeo), Development Research Group, World Bank. Shi, M. and Svensson, J. (2002b). “Conditional political budget cycles” (mimeo), Development Research Group, World Bank Shi, M. and Svensson, J. (2006). “Political budget cycles: do they differ across countries and why?” Journal of Public Economics, Vol.90, pp. 1367–1389. Veiga, L. G. and Veiga, F. J. (2007), “Political Business Cycle at the Municipal Level”, Public Choice, Vol. 131, No. 1/2, pp. 45-64 Yadav, Y. (1999). “Electoral Politics in the Time of Change: India’s Third Electoral System, 1989-99”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. 34, No. 34/35, pp. 2393-2399. Election Commission of India, All the General Election State wise Results, (http://eci.nic.in/eci_main1/ElectionStatistics.aspx) Association for Democratic Reform, India and myneta.info Reserve Bank of India, Yearly Database on State Finance: A Study of Budgets (State Finances: A Study of Budgets, https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/AnnualPublications.aspx?head=State%20Finances%20:%20A%20Study%20of%20Budgets ) Database of Central Statistical Organization Database of Ministry of Finance database |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/75078 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Center-State Political Transfer Cycles in India. (deposited 19 Apr 2016 02:56)
-
Center-State Political Transfer Cycles in India. (deposited 05 Aug 2016 04:46)
- Center-State Political Transfer Cycles in India. (deposited 15 Nov 2016 10:38) [Currently Displayed]
-
Center-State Political Transfer Cycles in India. (deposited 05 Aug 2016 04:46)