Brahmachari, Deborshi (2016): Neoclassical Economics as a Method of Scientific Research Program : A review of existing literature.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_75341.pdf Download (437kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper aims at a commentary on the Neoclassical Economics as a Method of Scientific Research Program which argues that many theories in Neo-Classical Economics when tested using Lakatos’ Methodology of Scientific Research Program, were not categorised as 'progressive research program'. This finds that some endogenous growth theories have now been tested by few researcher as progressive in terms of Lakatos’ Scientific Research Program.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Neoclassical Economics as a Method of Scientific Research Program : A review of existing literature |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Scientific Research Program, Neo-Classical Economics, evolution of theory, Research Methodology, Research methods. |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology |
Item ID: | 75341 |
Depositing User: | Deborshi Brahmachari |
Date Deposited: | 04 Dec 2016 06:02 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 21:18 |
References: | Bruce J. Caldwell, Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century, Pub: Allen and Unwin, London (1982) Bruce J. Caldwell,, A Critique of Friedman’s methodological instrumentalism, Southern Economic Journal, Vol.47, No.2, PP 366-374 (1980) Daniel M. Hausman , Economic Methodology in a Nutshell, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 3, No. 2 (Spring, 1989), pp. 115-127 Hands, D.W, Reflection without Rules, Cambridge (UK), CambridgeUniversity Press. (2001), Ian Hacking, Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science, Ian Hacking, Cambridge University Press,1983 Imre Lakatos and Paul Feyerabend, For and against Method: Including Lakatos's Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence, Edited by Matteo Motterlini, University Of Chicago Press, 1999 Imre Lakatos, Alan Musgrave (ed),( 1970), Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs, Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Imre Lakatos, Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, Vol. 69 (1968 - 1969), pp. 149-186 John S. McGee, Predatory Price Cutting: The Standard Oil (N. J.) Case, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 1. (Oct., 1958), pp. 137-169 Karl Popper, Science as Falsification, Conjectures and Refutations, (1963) Katrin Assenmacher-Wesche and Stefan Gerlach, Understanding the Link between Money Growth and Inflation in the Euro Area, Center for Economic Policy Research http://stefangerlach.com/CEPR-DP5683.pdf L. D. Keita, Science, Rationality and Neoclassical Economics, University of Delaware Press, 187 pages, 1992. Lawrence A. Boland, A Critique of Friedman’s Critics Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 503-22, 1979 Mario Pomini, The Neoclassical Endogenous Growth Theory on Retrospect: a Lakatosian Interpretation, Studi e Note di Economia, Anno XVII, n. 2-2012, pp. 249-276 Mark Blaug, The Methodology of Economics: Or, How Economists Explain, Series: Cambridge Surveys of Economic Literature, 1992 Michal Brzezinski and & Michal Dzielinskia, Is endogenous growth theory degenerating? Another look at Lakatosian appraisal of growth theories ,Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 16, issue 3, pages 243-263, 2009 Milton Friedman, The Methodology of Positive Economics, in Essays In Positive Economics, Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1953), pp. 3-43 https://campus.fsu.edu/bbcswebdav/orgs/econ_office_org/PowerPoint_Files/2023-Joe_Calhoun/2023_Chapter_01/Friedman-Essays_in_Positive_Economics.pdf Paul A. Samuelson, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Harvard University Press 1947(Enlarged ed., 1983) Philip Mirowski, More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature's Economics, Cambridge University Press, 1989 Redman, D. A., Economics and the Philosophy of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.(1991) Sandra Silva, On evolutionary technological change and economic growth: Lakatos as a starting point for appraisal, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 111-135,2009 Spiro Latsis, Situational Determinism in Economics, The British Journal for the Philosophy of science, pp 207-245,1972. http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.2307/686686?uid=3738256&uid=2&uid=4&sid=21103845472177 Thomas Kuhn (1962) The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Revolutions, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, University of Chicago Press, 1962 Uskali Maki, Method and appraisal in Economics, 1976-2006. Journal of Economic Methodology, vol. 15, issue 4, pages 409-423, 2008 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/75341 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Neoclassical Economics as a Method of Scientific Research Program : A review of existing literature. (deposited 04 Dec 2016 06:02) [Currently Displayed]