Fernandez, Jose and Gohmann, Stephan and Pinkston, Joshua (2015): Breaking Bad in Bourbon Country: Does Alcohol Prohibition Encourage Methamphetamine Production?
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_75544.pdf Download (430kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines the influence of local alcohol prohibition on the prevalence of methamphetamine labs. Using multiple sources of data for counties in Kentucky, we compare various measures of meth manufacturing in wet, moist, and dry counties. Our preferred estimates address the endogeneity of local alcohol policies by exploiting differences in counties’ religious compositions between the 1930s, when most local-option votes took place, and recent years. Even controlling for current religious affiliations, religious composition following the end of national Prohibition strongly predicts current alcohol restrictions. We carefully examine the validity of our identifying assumptions, and consider identification under alternative assumptions. Our results suggest that the number of meth lab seizures in Kentucky would decrease by 34.5 percent if all counties became wet.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Breaking Bad in Bourbon Country: Does Alcohol Prohibition Encourage Methamphetamine Production? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Alcohol prohibition, methamphetamine production, dry counties |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K32 - Environmental, Health, and Safety Law K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K42 - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law |
Item ID: | 75544 |
Depositing User: | Joshua Pinkston |
Date Deposited: | 12 Dec 2016 05:52 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 14:23 |
References: | Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2005a). An evaluation of instrumental variable strategies for estimating the effects of catholic schooling. Journal of Human Resources, 40(4), 791-821. Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2005b). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), 151-184. Anderson, D. M., Crost, B., & Rees, D. I. (2014). Wet Laws, Drinking Establishments, and Violent Crime. Association of Religion Data Archives. (various years). Churches and Church Membership in the United States, various years. Retrieved from www.theARDA.com Baughman, R., Conlin, M., Dickert-Conlin, S., & Pepper, J. (2001). Slippery when wet: the effects of local alcohol access laws on highway safety. Journal of health economics, 20(6), 1089-1096. Campbell, C. A., Hahn, R. A., Elder, R., Brewer, R., Chattopadhyay, S., Fielding, J., . . . Middleton, J. C. (2009). The effectiveness of limiting alcohol outlet density as a means of reducing excessive alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harms. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 37(6), 556-569. Carpenter, C. (2005). Heavy alcohol use and the commission of nuisance crime: evidence from underage drunk driving laws. American Economic Review, 95(2), 267-272. Carpenter, C., & Dobkin, C. (forthcoming). The drinking age, alcohol consumption, and crime. AEJ–Applied Microeconomics, forthcoming. Conlin, M., Dickert‐Conlin, S., & Pepper, J. (2005). The Effect of Alcohol Prohibition on Illicit‐Drug‐Related Crimes. Journal of Law and Economics, 48(1), 215-234. Crost, B., & Guerrero, S. (2012). The effect of alcohol availability on marijuana use: Evidence from the minimum legal drinking age. Journal of health economics, 31(1), 112-121. Crost, B., & Rees, D. I. (2013). The minimum legal drinking age and marijuana use: New estimates from the NLSY97. Journal of health economics, 32(2), 474-476. Cunningham, J. K., & Liu, L. M. (2003). Impacts of federal ephedrine and pseudoephedrine regulations on methamphetamine‐related hospital admissions. Addiction, 98(9), 1229-1237. Cunningham, J. K., & Liu, L. M. (2005). Impacts of federal precursor chemical regulations on methamphetamine arrests. Addiction, 100(4), 479-488. Cunningham, J. K., Maxwell, J. C., Campollo, O., Cunningham, K. I., Liu, L. M., & Lin, H. L. (2010). Proximity to the US–Mexico border: a key to explaining geographic variation in US methamphetamine, cocaine and heroin purity. Addiction, 105(10), 1785-1798. Deza, M. (2015). The effects of alcohol on the consumption of hard drugs: regression discontinuity evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Youth, 1997. Health Economics, 24(4), 419-438. DiNardo, J., & Lemieux, T. (2001). Alcohol, marijuana, and American youth: the unintended consequences of government regulation. Journal of health economics, 20(6), 991-1010. Dobkin, C., & Nicosia, N. (2009). The war on drugs: methamphetamine, public health, and crime. The American Economic Review, 99(1), 324. Dobkin, C., Nicosia, N., & Weinberg, M. (2014). Are supply-side drug control efforts effective? Evaluating OTC regulations targeting methamphetamine precursors. Journal of Public Economics, 120, 48-61. Gonzales, R., Mooney, L., & Rawson, R. (2010). The methamphetamine problem in the United States. Annual Review of Public Health, 31, 385. Haines, M. R. (2004). the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research. Historical, Demographic, Economic, and Social Data: The United States, 1790-2000 [Computer file]. ICPSR02896-v2. Hamilton, NY: Colgate University. Ann Arbor: MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producers]. Keafe, J. D. (2001, July 12, 2001). DEA Congressional Testimony. House Committee on Government Reform Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources. Retrieved from http://www.dea.gov/pr/speeches-testimony/2001t/ct071201p.html Levitt, S. D. (1998). Why do increased arrest rates appear to reduce crime: deterrence, incapacitation, or measurement error? Economic Inquiry, 36(3), 353-372. Lott Jr, J. R., & Whitley, J. (2003). Measurement error in county-level UCR data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(2), 185-198. Marshall, B. D., & Werb, D. (2010). Health outcomes associated with methamphetamine use among young people: a systematic review. Addiction, 105(6), 991-1002. Miron, J. A., & Zwiebel, J. (1995). The economic case against drug prohibition. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 175-192. Oster, E. (Forthcoming). Unobservable selection and coefficient stability: Theory and validation. Journal of Business Economics and Statistics. Pacula, R. L. (1998). Does increasing the beer tax reduce marijuana consumption? Journal of health economics, 17(5), 557-585. Pepper, J., Petrie, C., & Sullivan, S. (2010). Measurement error in criminal justice data Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 353-374): Springer. Strumpf, K. S., & Oberholzer‐Gee, F. (2002). Endogenous policy decentralization: Testing the central tenet of economic federalism. Journal of Political Economy, 110(1), 1-36. Toma, E. F. (1988). State liquor licensing, implicit contracting, and dry/wet counties. Economic Inquiry, 26(3), 507-524. Weisheit, R. A., & Wells, L. E. (2010). Methamphetamine laboratories: The geography of drug production. Western Criminology Review, 11, 9. Yandle, B. (1983). Bootleggers and Baptists-The Education of a Regulatory Economists. Regulation, 7, 12. Yörük, B. K., & Yörük, C. E. (2011). The impact of minimum legal drinking age laws on alcohol consumption, smoking, and marijuana use: evidence from a regression discontinuity design using exact date of birth. Journal of health economics, 30(4), 740-752. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/75544 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Breaking Bad: Are Meth Labs Justified in Dry Counties? (deposited 25 Aug 2015 17:51)
- Breaking Bad in Bourbon Country: Does Alcohol Prohibition Encourage Methamphetamine Production? (deposited 12 Dec 2016 05:52) [Currently Displayed]