The Indebtedness of Rural Labour in India

Borooah, Vani and Das, Smita (2008): The Indebtedness of Rural Labour in India. Published in: Journal of Quantitative Economics , Vol. 7, (2009): pp. 106-119.

Abstract

This study examines the issue of debt distress of rural labour households (agricultural and non-agricultural labour), in all the major Indian states, using data from the 61st round, pertaining to 2004-05, of the National Sample Survey (NSS). We conduct this study at various levels and using different methodological approaches. First, using a definition of “debt distress”, set out in detail in the following section, we calculate the value of debt distress for every rural labour household (RLH) in the NSS. Then we aggregate these households to rank states, districts, and social groups according to the degree of their distress. Second, using the tools of inequality analysis, we compute the degree of inequality in the distribution of distress among indebted RLH and ask how much of this inequality can be explained by the fact households (a) live in different states and (b) belong to different social groups? Third, using the tools of regression analysis, we examine the strength of the factors impinging on whether a household is a debtor household and, if it is, the strength of the factors determining whether it obtained loans from institutional sources or from money lenders and whether it took a loan for “productive” or “non-productive” purposes.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Debt, Distress, Rural, India
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R23 - Regional Migration ; Regional Labor Markets ; Population ; Neighborhood Characteristics

References

Cowell, F.A. and Jenkins, S.P. (1995), ‘How Much Inequality Can We Explain? A Methodology and an Application to the United States’, Economic Journal, vol. 105, pp. 421-30.

Deshpande, R.S., “Suicide By Farmers in Karnataka”, Economic and Political Weekly, June 30, pp. 2601-2610.

Mishra, S. (2006), “Farmers’ Suicides in Maharashtra”, Economic and Political Weekly, June 30, pp. 1538-1545.

Mohankumar, S. and Sharma, R.K. (2006), Analysis of Farmer Suicides in Kerala, Economic and Political Weekly, June 30, pp. 1553-1558.

Panagariya, A. (2008), India: The Emerging Giant, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Satish, P. (2006), “Institutional Credit, Indebtedness and Suicides in Punjab”, Economic and Political Weekly, June 30, pp. 2574-2761.

Shorrocks, A.F. (1980), ‘A Class of Additively Decomposable Measures’, Econometrica, vol. 50, pp. 613-25.

Sridhar, V. “Why do Farmers Commit Suicide?”, Economic and Political Weekly, June 30, pp. 1559-1565.

Suri, K.C. (2006), “Political Economy of Agrarian Distress”, Economic and Political Weekly, June 30, pp. 1523-1529.

Theil, H. (1967), Economics and Information Theory, Amsterdam: North-Holland.