Defining the Relevant Product Market: An Application of Price Tests to the Beer Market in Barbados

Hippolyte, Rommell (2016): Defining the Relevant Product Market: An Application of Price Tests to the Beer Market in Barbados.

Abstract

This paper attempts to determine if beer is a separate relevant product market from rum and soft drinks. Three conventional statistical tests - Pearson’s correlation, unit root and Granger causality - are applied to average monthly retail price data from Barbados for the three categories of beverages for the period January 2012 to July 2015. The results of both the correlation and Granger causality tests suggest that beer is a distinct product market from rum and soft drinks, while the result of the unit root test was inconclusive. The results of the paper should interest practitioners of competition law in the Caribbean region as it shows that price tests could be used as quantitative proof on market boundaries to support the intuition and evidence the traditional Small but Significant Non-transitory Increase in Price (SSNIP) test provides.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: price tests, relevant market, beverages, competition law, Barbados
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K21 - Antitrust Law; L - Industrial Organization > L4 - Antitrust Issues and Policies > L40 - General

References

Boshoff, W.H. (2011) “Conceptual and Empirical Advances in Antitrust Market Definition with Application to South African Competition Policy”, Doctoral Dissertation, University of Stellenbosch.

Dickey, D.A and W.A. Fuller (1979) "Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root", Journal of the American statistical association, 74(366), 427-431.

Forni, M. (2004) “Using stationarity tests in antitrust market definition,” American Law and Economics Review, 6(2), 441-464.

Granger, C.W. (1969) “Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods”, Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438.

Hosken, D and C.T. Taylor (2004) "Discussion of “Using stationarity tests in antitrust market definition",” American Law and Economics Review, 6(2), 465-475.

Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P.C.B. Schmidt, P., and Shin Y. (1992) “Testing for the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of unit root: How sure are we that the economics time series have a unit root?”, Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178.

Massey, P. (2000) “Market definition and market power in competition analysis”, Economic and Social Review, 31(4), 309-328.

Motta, M. (2004) “Competition Policy: Theory and Practice”, Cambridge University Press.

Sims, C., Stock, J and Watson, M. (1990) “Inference in linear time series models with some unit roots”, Econometrica, 58(1), 113-144.

Slade, M.E. (1986) “Exogeneity Tests of Market Boundaries Applied to Petroleum Products”, Journal of Industrial Economics, 34(3), 291-303.

Stigler, G.J and R. A. Sherwin (1985) “The Extent of the Market”, Journal of Law & Economics, 28(3), 555–85.

Zipitría, L. (2009) “Price Tests for Market Definition with an Application to the Beer Market in Uruguay”, available at https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=SECHI2009&paper_id=10