Kaplanhan, Fatih and Korkut, Cem (2016): Untaxed Social-Media Problem and Potential Solutions. Published in: Inquiry - Sarajevo Journal of Social Sciences , Vol. 2, No. 2 (26 December 0025): pp. 191-210.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_76204.pdf Download (267kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Advancement of internet innovation brings both pros and cons by changing the rules and dynamics of fields as trade, public service, education, entertainment, intelligence, and defense. The developments in web technology provided a lot of conveniences. On the other hand, this situation brought many problems because of lack of laws and rules in this field. One example of these challenges is those websites do not have branches in every country are not subject to taxation. This situation is directly related to the sovereign rights of the countries. Major international internet companies are only subject to tax in the countries where their headquarters are located and do not pay taxes in other nations where they earn money. Particularly in the developing countries, the tax loss reaches serious dimensions. This study will focus on the problem of social media taxation. Also, solution proposals will be presented especially for developing countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Untaxed Social-Media Problem and Potential Solutions |
English Title: | Untaxed Social-Media Problem and Potential Solutions |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | untaxed income, social media, taxation, internet taxation |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K29 - Other K - Law and Economics > K3 - Other Substantive Areas of Law > K34 - Tax Law M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M4 - Accounting and Auditing > M48 - Government Policy and Regulation |
Item ID: | 76204 |
Depositing User: | Dr Cem Korkut |
Date Deposited: | 15 Jan 2017 12:44 |
Last Modified: | 07 Oct 2019 03:57 |
References: | BBC, (30.03.2015). Starbucks, Google ve Amazon mecliste ifade verdi, http://www.bbc.com/turkce/ekonomi/2012/11/121113_tax_avoidance Ed. Uzel, G. (Türkiye Bilişim Şurası). Hukuk Çalışma Grubu Raporu: İnternet Servis Sağlayıcılarının Sorumlulukları ve İnternet Yayıncılığı. Ankara: Türkiye Bilişim Derneği. Eraslan, L. (2015). Sosyal Medya Toplum Araştırma. Beta Yayınları: İstanbul. Fonte, G., & Jones, G. (2015, 09 30). Italy's Renzi faces uphill struggle over Google Tax plan. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-italy-tax-internet-analysis-idUSKCN0RU1HS20150930 Heber, A. (2015, 05 11). Australia will get a 'Google tax' in the federal budget. http://www.businessinsider.com.au/australia-will-get-a-google-tax-in-the-federal-budget-2015-5 InternetWorldStats. (2015, 11 18). Internet Usage in Europe. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats4.htm#europe InternetWorldStats. (2015, 11 18). Top 20 Countries with the Highest Number of Intenet Users. http://www.internetworldstats.com/top20.htm İyigün, R. (2010, 12 06). Google, Twitter ve Benzeri Firmalardan Türkiye’de Alınan Reklam Hizmetlerinin Vergisel Boyutu ve Muhasebe Uygulaması. http://www.muhasebetr.com/yazarlarimiz/recepiyigun/002/ Khadem, N. (2015, 05 01). Google paid $11.7m tax in 2014, but says 'there's more we can do. www.smh.com.au: http://www.smh.com.au/business/google-paid-117m-tax-in-2014-but-says-theres-more-we-can-do-20150430-1mxbx7.html Kılıç, A. (2013). Devlet Eli İle İnternet İçerik Düzenlemesi Sorunu: TİB Örneği. Konya: Unpublished PhD Thesis. Selcuk University. Kiremitçi, Ü. (2012). İnternetin Gelişimi ile Birlikte Ortaya Çıkan Sorunlar ve İnternetin Düzenlenmesine Yönelik 5651 Sayılı Yasanın Getirdiği Önlemler, Uygulama Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri. Ankara: Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu. Kumcu, E. (2008). Rekabet Üzerine Denemeler. Ankara: Rekabet Kurumu Yayınları. Lin, T. (Yöneten). (2015). Internet Governance Forum [Sinema Filmi]. Moran, M., & Hunt, B. (2015, 12 23). Search Engine Marketing. http://semincbook.com/country-search-engines/ Öner, C. (2015, 12 23). Dar Mükellefiyette Ticari Kazancın Türkiye'de Elde Edilmiş Sayılmadığı Haller Üzerine. http://www.kazanci.com/kho2/hebb/files/dsp.php?fn=makale-cihatoner-1.htm&kw=`dar+m%C3%BCkellef`#_Toc403479485 Öz, S. (2015, 11 30). Twitter'ın Vergilendirilmesi. Vergi Sorunları Dergisi: http://www.vergisorunlari.com.tr/yazi.aspx?yazino=8 Sarı, E. (2011). 5651 Sayılı Kanun Kapsamında Erişim Sağlayıcılığı Kavramı: Getirilen Hak, Yükümlülük Ve Sorumluluklar, Dünya’daki Uygulama Örnekleri. Ankara: Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu. Sınar, H. (2001). İnternet ve Ceza Hukuku. Beta Yayınları: İstanbul. Soner, C. (2015, 12 23). Çifte Vergilendirmeyi Önleme Anlaşmaları. http://www.kazanci.com/kho2/hebb/files/dsp.php?fn=makale-cerensoner-2.htm&kw=`dar+m%C3%BCkellef`#fm Yaltı, B. (2006). İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesinin Vergi Hukukunda Kaynak Değeri Üzerine. Hukuk Araştırmaları Dergisi, Doç.Dr. Mehmet Somer’e Armağan. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/76204 |