Feminist Challenge to the Mainstream IR

Aydın, Gülşen (2016): Feminist Challenge to the Mainstream IR. Published in: European Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies , Vol. 2, No. 1 (May 2016): pp. 62-69.

Abstract

This study deals with the Feminist challenge to the Mainstream International Relations Discipline (IR) - rationalist theories, especially Realism - and the mainstream's responses to this challenge. It addresses the issue in five steps. Firstly, it sheds light on how Feminism is related to International Relations. Secondly, it examines how Feminist IR theorists criticize the Mainstream IR due to its state-centric approach and argue that being obsessed with anarchic international system prevented analysis of social relations, including gender relations. Thirdly, the study addresses how Feminism exposes the gender biases in central terms such as power, autonomy, rationality, security, and state. Fourthly, it examines how Feminist writing on IR challenges the dichotomies of the Mainstream IR. Fifthly, the study examines how the Mainstream has responded to that challenge. The conclusion argues that although Feminist challenge to mainstream IR cannot be deemed successful in reconstructing IR, Feminism still enriches our understanding of global politics.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: International Relations (IR), Feminism, Realism, state, gender, power.
• Subjects: J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination; Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General > Z00 - General

References

References

Elshtain, J. B. (1981). Public Man, Private Woman: Women in Social and Political Thought. Oxford: Martin Roberson Press.

Enloe, C. H. (2010). Nimo's war, Emma's war: Making feminist sense of the Iraq war. Univ of California Press.

Enloe, C. (2014). Bananas, beaches and bases: Making feminist sense of international politics. Univ of California Press.

Grant, R. (1991). In Grant R. and Newland K. The sources of gender bias in international relations theory. Gender and international relations, 8-26.

Grant R. and Newland K. (1991). Gender and International Relations. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.

Halliday, F. (1994). Hidden from international relations: women and the international arena. In Rethinking International Relations (pp. 147-169). Macmillan Education UK.

Hoffman, J. (2001). Gender and sovereignty: feminism, the state and international relations. Palgrave.

Keohane, R. O. (1998). Beyond dichotomy: Conversations between international relations and feminist theory. International Studies Quarterly, 42(1), 193-197.

Peterson, V. S. (1994). Gendered States: Feminist Visions of International Relations Theory.

Peterson, V. S. (1995). Reframing the politics of identity: Democracy, globalization and gender. Political Expressions, 1(1), 1-16.

Peterson, V. S. (2004). Feminist Theories Within, Invisible To, and Beyond IR. Th e Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 35-46.

Pettman, J. J. (1996). Worlding women. A Feminist International Politics. St Leonards: Allen&Unwin.

Reardon, B. (1996). Sexism and the war system. Syracuse University Press.

Roberts, B. (1983). No safe place: the war against women. Our Generation, 15(4), 7-26.

Runyan, A. S., & Peterson, V. S. (1991). The radical future of realism: feminist subversions of IR theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 16(1), 67-106.

Shepherd, L. J. (2010). Sex or gender? Bodies in world politics and why gender matters. Gender Matters in Global Politics: A Feminist Introduction to International Relations. London: Routledge, 3-16.

Steans, J. (2003). Engaging from the margins: feminist encounters with the ‘mainstream’of International Relations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(3), 428-454.

Tickner, J. A. (1988). Hans Morgenthau’s principles of political realism: A feminist reformulation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17(3), 429-40.

Tickner, J. A. (1991). On the fringes of the world economy: A feminist perspective. In The New International Political Economy (pp. 191-206). Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Tickner, J. A. (1992). Gender in international relations: Feminist perspectives on achieving global security. New York: Columbia University Press.

Tickner, J. (1997). You just don't understand: troubled engagements between feminists and IR theorists. International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), 611-632.

Tickner, J. A. (2001) Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Columbia University Press.

Tickner, J. A., Buchwalter, S., Finklestein, J., & Sherman, L. (2004). The Growth and Future of Feminist Theories in International Relations. The Brown Journal of World Affairs, 10(2), 47-56.

Tickner, J. A. & Sjoberg L. (2013). Feminism (pp. 205-223). In Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S. (2013). International relations theories. Oxford University Press.

True, Jacque (1996). Feminism (231-276). In Burchill S., Devetak R., Linklater A., Matthew Peterson, Reus-Smit C. and True J. (eds.). Theories of International Relations. New York: Palgrave

Wibben, Annick TR. "Feminist international relations: Old debates and new directions." The Brown journal of world affairs 10.2 (2004): 97-114.

Youngs, G. (2004). Feminist International Relations: a contradiction in terms? Or: why women and gender are essential to understanding the world ‘we’live in. International Affairs, 80(1), 75-87.