Diferenţa dintre genuri în alocarea timpului liber în România

Roman, Monica (2006): Diferenţa dintre genuri în alocarea timpului liber în România. Published in: Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies , Vol. 5, No. 14 (September 2006): pp. 63-73.

Abstract

Recent theoretical and empirical studies tend to highlight the prominent role that time plays in society, in a context of changing rhythms of work, the ageing of the European population and changing family structures. In this contribution I analyse the way time is used for leisure in Romania. I highlight the time use for creative and leisure activities in respect with gender, following the hypothesis that leisure is an important dimension of gender gap. It was used factor analysis to observe the differences existing in time use for leisure in respect with occupational status, marital status and education.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Gender Difference in Alloting Leisure Time in Romania
• Language: Romanian
• Keywords: time use, leisure, gender gap, factor analysis, Romania
• Subjects: Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z12 - Religion; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare, Well-Being; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B54 - Feminist Economics

References

1. Adam, Barbara Timewatch, Polity Press, 1995, Cambridge. 2. Beck, Ulrich and Elisabeth Beck-Gernsheim The Normal Chaos of Love, Polity Press, 1995, Cambridge. 3. Becker, Gary S. ‘Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor’, Journal of Labor Economics, 1985 4. Berk, Sarah Fenstermaker The Gender Factory: The Apportionment of Work in American Households, Plenum, 1985 New York. 5. Dragomir, O, Miroiu, M. Lexicon feminist, Editura Polirom, Iaşi,2002 6. 7. Fraser, Nancy ‘After the family wage: a postindustrial thought experiment’, in Barbara Hobson and Anne Marie Berggren, eds, Crossing Borders Gender and Citizenship in Transition, 1997, Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination, Sweden

8. Giddens, Anthony The Transformation of Intimacy, Polity Press, 1992, Cambridge. 9. Glucksman, Miriam A. ‘“What a difference a day makes”: a theoretical and historical exploration of temporality and gender’, Sociology, 32, 1998 10. Hallet, M., “National and Regional Development in Central and Eastern Europe: Implications for EU Structural Assistance”, in Economic Papers, no. 120/1997, 11. Hochschild, Arlie R. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1983 12. Iluţ, Petru Sociopsihologia şi antropologia familiei, Editura Polirom, Iaşi, 2005 13. Larson, Reed and Maryse H. Richards Divergent Realities. The Emotional Lives of Mothers, Fathers, and Adolescents, Basic Books, New York, 1994 14. Landes, David S. Revolution in Time: Clocks and the Making of the Modern World, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. ,1983 15. Lvigne, M. The Economics of Tranzition, Macmilian Press Ltd., London, 1995 16. Lyndon Shanley, M, Narayan, U. (coord.) Reconstrucţia teoriei politice. Eseuri feministe, Editura Polirom, Iaşi, 2001 17. Michelson, W. Time use,Expanding explanation in the social sciences, Paradigm Publishers, London, 2005 18. Miroiu, M. Conveio. Despre natură, femei şi morală, Editura Polirom, Iaşi, 19. Miroiu, M. Drumul către autonomie, Editura Polirom, Iaşi, 2004 20. Nowotny, Helga Time: The Modern and the Postmodern Experience, Polity Press, 1994, Cambridge. 21. Oppenheimer, Valerie Kincaide ‘Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: the specialization and trading model’, Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 1997 22. Pasti, Vl. Ultima inegalitate. Relaţiile de gen în România, Editura Polirom, Iaşi, 2003 23. Robinson, John P. and Geoffrey Godbey Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time, Penn State University Press, 1997, University Park. 24. Roman, M. Roman, M. Living Area Differences in Labor Participation of Elderly. The Romanian case, IATUR Conference, Lisbon, 2003 25. Roman, M. Time use for leisure in Romania, paper presented at IATUR Conference, Rome, October 2004

26. Roman, M. Spatial dimensions of leisure: time use for going out activities, paper presented at IATUR Conference,Halifax Canada, Nov 2005

27. Saporta, G. Probabliliote, analyse des donne et statistique, Ed. Technique, Paris, 1990 28. Voineagu, V. et al. Analiza factorială, Editura Aramis, Bucureşti 2001