Widodo, Tri (2003): Industrial Organization: Indonesian Manufacture. Published in: Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business (JIEB) , Vol. 20, No. 5 (31 October 2005): pp. 15-30.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_78326.pdf Download (542kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Structure-Conduct-Performance (SCP) is a central issue in the Industrial-Organization (IO). Analysis of SCP typically uses linear partial and simple approaches: Structure affects Conduct and then Conduct affects Performance. In the real world, Structure, Conduct and Performance have associated relationship with each other interactively and simultaneously. This paper uses analytical approach to scrutinizes the model of interactive SCP of Indonesian manufacturing industry and to apply simultaneous equations econometric models. This paper concludes that the SCP paradigm may be improperly giving to much weight to concentration as an explanatory variable for industry conduct and performance. In the case of Indonesian manufacture, concentration does not occupy the central place of the SCP paradigm.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Industrial Organization: Indonesian Manufacture |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Structure-Conduct-Performance; Industrial Organization; Interactive Model |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing |
Item ID: | 78326 |
Depositing User: | Tri Widodo |
Date Deposited: | 16 Apr 2017 15:41 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 16:28 |
References: | Adnan Hadjam at al, 1986. Pengaruh Pembatasan Ekspor Terhadap Kinerja Industri di Indonesia. Unpublished . PAU-UGM. Yogyakarta. Bain, J.S. 1956. Barrier to New Competition. Cambridge, MA. Harvard University Press. Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS). Industrial Statistic. Indonesia Clarke, R. ‘Profit margins and market concentration in UK manufacturing Industry: 1970-1976’. Applied Economics, 16: 57-71. Geroski, 1981. ‘Price leadership and welfare losses in US manufacturing’. American Economic Review, 76:756-67. Holterman, S.E. 1973.’Market structure and Economics Performance in UK Manufacturing Industry’. Journal of Industrial Economics, 27: 359-68. Intriligator, M.D., J.F. Weston and H. De Angelo, 1975. An econometric test of the structure-conduct-performance paradigm in industrial organization. Paper presented at the Econometric Society 3rd World Congress, Toronto. Karseno, A. R, 1995. Efisiensi Manufaktur dan Peran Teknologi di Indonesia. Paper presented in Seminar Internasional Lustrum ke-8 Fakultas Ekonomi UGM. Yogyakarta. Karseno, A. R, and Tri Widodo, 1996. Efisiensi (teknik, skala, alokatif) unggulan produk manufaktur Indonesia. Research funded by MM-UGM. Unpublsihed. Khalilzabeth, S.J. 1974. ‘Market structure and price-cost margins in UK manufacturing industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 54:64-76. Mohamed, A. dan Hall Hill, 1988. Industrialisasi di ASEAN. LP3ES. Jakarta. Martin, S. 1988. Industrial Economics: Economic Analysis and Public Policy. Macmillan Publishing Company. New York. Moschandreas, M. 2000. Business Economics. Business Press. London. Poot, H. 1991. “Interindustry linkage in Indonesian manufacturing”, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Vol. 27, No. 2, Agustus. Poot, H., Arie, K., dan Jaap, C.J., 1992. Industrialisation and Trade in Indonesia, Gadjah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta. Porter, E. M. 1990. Competitive Advantage of The Nations. The Free Press. New York. Stigler, G.J. The Organization of Industry. Homewood, IL: Irwin. Weiss, L. W., 1971. Quantitative Studies of Industrial Organization. In M.D. Intriligator, Ed. Frontier of Quantitative Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company. Weiss, L.W., 1974. The Concentration-profit relationship and antitrust. In H.J Goldschmid, H.M. Mann, and J.F. Westen, Eds., Industrial Concentration: The New Learning. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/78326 |