Porzecanski, Arturo C. (2016): The Origins of Argentina’s Litigation and Arbitration Saga, 2002-2016. Published in: Fordham International Law Journal , Vol. 40, No. 1 (2016): pp. 41-77.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_73377.pdf Download (440kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The voluminous and protracted litigation and arbitration saga featuring the Republic of Argentina (mostly as defendant or respondent, respectively) established important legal and arbitral precedents, as illustrated by three cases involving Argentina which were appealed all the way up to the US Supreme Court and were settled in 2014. At first glance, the scale of Argentina-related litigation activity might be explained by the sheer size of the government’s 2001 default, the world’s largest-ever up to that point. However, its true origins are to be found in the unusually coercive and aggressive way that the authorities in that country went about defaulting on, and restructuring, their sovereign debt obligations. The mass filing of arbitration claims, in turn, was prompted by Argentina’s radical and seemingly irreversible changes to the “rules of the game” affecting foreign strategic investors, which broke with binding commitments prior governments had made in multiple bilateral investment treaties. In sum, a major deviation from best practices as understood and settled in the early 2000s, which codified how economic policy adjustments are to be made in a way that minimizes damage to the investment climate, preserves access to the international capital markets, and promotes rapid and sustainable economic growth, lies at the root of Argentina’s litigation and arbitration saga which came to an end during 2016.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Origins of Argentina’s Litigation and Arbitration Saga, 2002-2016 |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Argentina, FSIA, sovereign, default, expropriation, restructuring, New York, ICSID |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F34 - International Lending and Debt Problems F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F51 - International Conflicts ; Negotiations ; Sanctions F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F65 - Finance H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H63 - Debt ; Debt Management ; Sovereign Debt K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior N - Economic History > N2 - Financial Markets and Institutions > N26 - Latin America ; Caribbean |
Item ID: | 79122 |
Depositing User: | Arturo C. Porzecanski |
Date Deposited: | 14 May 2017 16:43 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 17:37 |
References: | Alvarez José E., and Kathryn Khamsi. 2009. The Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors: A Glimpse into the Heart of the Investment Regime, in Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2008/2009, 379 (Karl P. Sauvant ed.). Bjorklund, Andrea K. 2012. Case Comment: Republic of Argentina v BG Group PLC, 27 ICSID Rev. 4. Daseking, Christina, Atish Ghosh, Timothy Lane, and Alun Thomas. 2004. Lessons from the Crisis in Argentina 38 (IMF Occasional Paper #236). Enderlein, Henrik, Christoph Trebesch, and Laura von Daniels. 2012. Sovereign Debt Disputes: A Database on Government Coerciveness during Debt Crises, 31 J. Int’l Mon. & Fin. 250. Feldman, Mark B. 1986. The United States Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 in Perspective: A Founder’s View, 35 Int’l & Comp. L.Q. 302. IMF. 2013. Sovereign Debt Restructuring: Recent Developments and Implications for the Fund’s Legal and Policy Framework, Apr. 26. Ingenito, Adriana T., and Christina G. Hioureas. 2015. Carving Out New Exceptions to Sovereign Immunity: Why the NML Capital Cases May Harm U.S. Interests Abroad, 30 Md. J. Int’l L. 118. Kasenetz, Eric David. 2010. Desperate Times Call for Desperate Measures: The Aftermath of Argentina’s State of Necessity and the Current Fight in the ICSID, 41 Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev. 709. Kikeri, Sunita, Thomas Kenyon, and Vincent Palmade. 2006. Reforming the Investment Climate: Lessons for Practitioners (World Bank). Kingdon, Emma. 2014. Leveraging Litigation: Enforcing Sovereign Debt Obligations in NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina, 37 B.C. Int’l & Comp. L. Rev. 30. Kochendörfer-Lucius, Gudrun, and Boris Pleskovic, eds. 2005. Investment Climate, Growth, and Poverty (World Bank). Lin, Tsai-Yu. 2012. Systemic Reflections on Argentina’s Non-Compliance with ICSID Arbitral Awards: A New Role of the Annulment Committee at Enforcement?, 5 Cont. Asia Arb. J. 22. Neve, Brett. 2014. NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina: An Alternative to the Inadequate Remedies under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, 39 N.C. J. Int’l L. & Com. Reg. 631. Olmos Giupponi, Belen. 2015. ICSID Tribunals and Sovereign Debt Restructuring-Related Litigation: Mapping the Further Implications of the Alemanni Decision, 30 ICSID Rev. 556. Porzecanski, Arturo C. 2005. From Rogue Creditors to Rogue Debtors: Implications of Argentina’s Default, 6 Chi. J. Int’l L. 318. Sacerdoti, Giorgio. 2013. BIT Protections and Economic Crises: Limits to Their Coverage, the Impact of Multilateral Financial Regulation and the Defense of Necessity, 28 ICSID Rev. 351. Schill, Stephan W. 2007. International Investment Law and the Host State’s Power to Handle Economic Crises, 24 J. Int’l Arb. 265. Schooler, Lionel M. 2014. Arbitrators as Gatekeepers in International Investment Dispute Arbitration Involving a Sovereign State: BG Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina, 23 Alternative Resol. 31. Schreuer, Christoph. 2013. Arbitration of Investment Disputes, in The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication 296 (Gebare P. R. Romano, Karen J. Alter & Yuval Shany, eds.). Simões, Joanna. 2011. Sovereign Bond Disputes before ICSID Tribunals: Lessons from the Argentina Crisis, 17 Law & Bus. Rev. Am. 683. Simowitz, Aaron D. 2014-15. Transnational Enforcement Discovery, 83 Fordham L. Rev. 3293. Sturzenegger, Federico, and Jeromin Zettelmeyer. 2007. Debt Defaults and Lessons from a Decade of Crises. Uchkunova, Inna, and Oleg Temnikov. 2014. Enforcement of Awards under the ICSID Convention: What Solutions to the Problem of State Immunity?, 29 ICSID Rev. 187. Waibel, Michael. 2007. Two Worlds of Necessity in ICSID Arbitration: CMS and LG&E, 20 Leiden J Intl L 637. World Bank. 1992. Governance and Development 22. World Bank, 1997. World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World. World Bank, 2004a. The Practice of Regulation 83, in Doing Business in 2004: Understanding Regulation. World Bank, 2004b. World Development Report 2005: A Better Investment Climate for Everyone. World Bank, 2009 “Improving the Private Investment Climate for Recovery and Growth,” Global Monitoring Report: A Development Emergency, 51. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79122 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
The Origins of Argentina’s Litigation and Arbitration Saga, 2002-2016. (deposited 30 Aug 2016 06:38)
- The Origins of Argentina’s Litigation and Arbitration Saga, 2002-2016. (deposited 14 May 2017 16:43) [Currently Displayed]