Ramsey, Austin Ford and Santeramo, Fabio Gaetano (2017): Crop Insurance in the European Union: Lessons and Caution from the United States. Forthcoming in: EuroChoices
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79164.pdf Download (86kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Recent changes in the Common Agricultural Policy have focused attention on the possibility of an enlarged crop insurance program in Europe. Several countries in the European Union already have national crop insurance schemes, but the performance of these programs in terms of realized demand has been low. In some cases, participation in the programs remains low in spite of significant subsidies to insurance premiums. This situation can be contrasted with the federal crop insurance program in the United States, which is now the principal instrument of American agricultural policy and insured over 366 million acres in 2015. We focus on two questions: are there any justifications for subsidized crop insurance and how could such a scheme possibly be implemented in the EU? Quantitative and qualitative comparisons of the current state of crop insurance in the EU and US serve to motivate our observations.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Crop Insurance in the European Union: Lessons and Caution from the United States |
English Title: | Crop Insurance in the European Union: Lessons and Caution from the United States |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Crop Insurance, EU, USA, Insurance scheme |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G22 - Insurance ; Insurance Companies ; Actuarial Studies Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy |
Item ID: | 79164 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo |
Date Deposited: | 16 May 2017 15:51 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 18:35 |
References: | ARMS (2010). Farm Financial and Crop Production Practices. Bielza, M., Conte, C., Dittman, C., Gallego, J., and Stroblmair, J. (2008). Agricultural Insurance Schemes. TP 266, European Commission IPSC- AGRIFISH. Chang, H. and Zilberman, D. (2014). On the political economy of agricultural disaster relief payments: application to Taiwan. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 41(4): 547–680. Enjolras, G. and Sentis, P. (2011).Crop insurance policies and purchases in France. Agricultural Economics, 42(4): 475-486. Garrido, A. and Zilberman, D. (2008). Revisiting the demand of agricultural insurance: the case of Spain. Agricultural Finance Review, 68(1): 43-66. Glauber J. (2015). Agricultural Insurance and the World Trade Organization. IFPRI Discussion Paper 1473, October 2015. Goodwin, B.K. (1993). An Empirical Analysis of the Demand for Multiple Peril Crop Insurance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75(2): 425-434. Goodwin, B.K. and Smith, V.H. (2013). What Harm Is Done By Subsidizing Crop Insurance?. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 95(2): 489–497. Liesivaara, P. and Myyrä, S. (2015). Feasibility of an Area-Yield Insurance Scheme in the EU: Evidence from Finland. EuroChoices, 14(1): 28-33. Miranda, M. and Glauber, J. (1997). Systemic Risk, Reinsurance, and the Failure of Crop Insurance Markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79: 206-215. Meuwissen, M. P. M., Huirne, R. B. M., and Skees, J. R. (2003). Income Insurance in European Agriculture. EuroChoices, 2(1): 12-17. Santeramo, F. G., Goodwin, B. K., Adinolfi, F., and Capitanio, F. (2016). Farmer Participation, Entry and Exit Decisions in the Italian Crop Insurance Programme. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 67(3): 639–657. Sherrick, B. J., Barry, P. J., Ellinger, P. N., and Schnitkey, G. D. (2004). Factors Influencing Farmers’ Crop Insurance Decisions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86(1): 103-114. Tangermann, S. (2011). Risk management in agriculture and the future of the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy. International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, Issue Paper 31. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79164 |