Mattera, Raffaele (2017): Motivation, workout and performance - a model for amatorial sports.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79243.pdf Download (295kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The previous literature has not devoted enough space to “motivation for training” issues, especially for amateur sports. Generally, is possible imagine some factors which influence motivation for training in professional sports like an high remuneration, fame, etc. However is more difficult find these motivation factors it in the amatorial context, because an amatorial player already has not a substantial remuneration, has a job beyond sports, etc. The main result of this paper is that a large number of players in a team encourage each other to work hard during training session. All based on the assumption that more workout brings to better performance.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Motivation, workout and performance - a model for amatorial sports |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | motivation for training, amatorial sports, work motivation, workout motivation, sport |
Subjects: | Z - Other Special Topics > Z0 - General |
Item ID: | 79243 |
Depositing User: | Raffaele Mattera |
Date Deposited: | 22 May 2017 09:07 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 11:14 |
References: | 1. Barnard, C., (1938). The Functions of the Executive, Cambridge. 2. Lazera, E. and Rosen, S. (1981). ‘Rank Order Tournaments as Optimal Labor Contracts’, Journal of Political Economy, 89, 841–64. 3. Gibbons, R., and Murphy, K. J. (1992). ‘Optimal Incentive Contracts in the Presence of Career Concerns: Theory and Evidence’, Journal of Political Economy, 100(3), 468–505 4. Palomino, F. and Rigotti, L. (2000). The Sport League's Dilemma: Competitive Balance Versus Incentives To Win, Tilburg University CentER for Economic Research Working Paper No. 2000-109. 5. Laffont J., and Martimort D., (2001). THE THEORY OF INCENTIVES : THE PRINCIPAL-AGENT MODEL, Princeton. 6. Coetzee, B., Grobbelaar, H. W., & Gird, C. C. (2006). Sport psychological skills that distinguish successful from less successful soccer teams. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 51(6), 383–401. 7. Andreff W., Szymanski S., (2006). Handbook on the Economics of Sport, Edward Elgar Publishing Inc. 8. Gillet, N., Vallerand, R., & Rosnet, E. (2009). Motivational clusters and performance in a real-life setting. Motivation and Emotion, 33(1), 49–62. 9. Gillet, N., Vallerand, R. J., Amoura, S., & Baldes, B. (2010). Influence of coaches’ autonomy support on athletes’ motivation and sport performance: A test of the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 11(2), 155–161. 10. Szymanski S., (2010). The comparative economics of sport, Palgrave Macmillan. 11. MacNamara, A., Button, A., & Collins, D. (2010). The role of psychological characteristics in facilitating the pathway to elite performance: Part 1: Indentifying mental skills and behaviors. The Sport Psychologist, 24, 52-73. 12. Claudia Zuber, Marc Zibung & Achim Conzelmann (2015). Motivational patterns as an instrument for predicting success in promising young football players, Journal of Sports Sciences, 33:2, 160-168 13. Ramis et al. (2017). The Effect of Coaches’ Controlling Style on the Competitive Anxiety of Young Athletes, Frontiers on Psychology, Volume 18, Article 572. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79243 |