Tulung, Joy Elly and Nelwan, Olivia and Lengkong, Viktor P. K. (2011): Top Management Team And Company Performance In Big Countries Vs Small Countries. Published in: Journal of Economics, Business, and Accountancy , Vol. 15, No. 1 (1 April 2012): pp. 59-70.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_79907.pdf Download (274kB) | Preview |
Abstract
So far, there has been little research related to the impact of globalization on corporate governance, particularly the internationalization of the board of directors of international or global companies. Besides that, there has been little attention to the nationality composition of top management. In connection with such a condition, this study attempts to investigate how the Nationality Diversity in Top Management Team (TMT) affects Company Performance in big countries in Europe versus small countries in Europe. The research data were management boards of companies in 111 companies: 30 in Germany, 38 in France, 25 in the Netherlands, and 18 in Belgium. The whole dataset was provided by Van Veen and Marsman (2008) and derived from this study on nationality diversity. The study provides several results. First, there is a positive relationship between the nationality diversity of TMT members and company performance. Second, the size of the companies depends on the size of the country; companies in the big countries have more employees than those in the small countries. Third, the result of company performance in the big countries and the small countries is not significant, so the performance of the companies in the big countries is not better than that of the companies in the small countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Top Management Team And Company Performance In Big Countries Vs Small Countries |
English Title: | Top Management Team And Company Performance In Big Countries Vs Small Countries |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Top Management Team, Nationality Diversity, Company Performance |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance |
Item ID: | 79907 |
Depositing User: | Joy Elly Tulung |
Date Deposited: | 22 Jul 2021 06:50 |
Last Modified: | 22 Jul 2021 06:50 |
References: | Alshimmiri, Turki, 2004, Board composition, executive remuneration, and corporate performance: the case of reits, Corporate Ownership & Control, Fall2004, Vol. 2 Issue 1, p104-118. Alexander, L. and Esser, S. U 1999, Globalizing the Board of Directors: Trends and strategies, report-conference board New York. Barnhart, Scott W.; Marr, M. Wayne; Rosenstein, Stuart, 1994, Firm Performance and Board Composition: Some New Evidence, Managerial & Decision Economics, Jul/Aug94, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p329-340. Birkner, M 2005, The status and dynamics of change of Top Management Team (TMT) demographics and capabilities in German large Firms between 1997- 2002: A theoretical exploration and extension of the Upper Echelon Perspective, Dissertation, University of St. Gallen Graduate School of Business Administration, Economics, Law and social Sciences (HSG). Carpenter, M.A. & J.W. Fredrickson, 2001, Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty, Academy of Management Journal, 44: 3: 533-546. DiStefano, J. J & Maznevski, M. L 2000, Creating value with diverse teams in global management, Organizational Dynamics, 29(1), 45-64. Elron, E 1997, Top management teams within multinational corporations: Effects of cultural heterogeneity, Leadership Quarterly, 8 (4): 393-412. Finkelstein, S, Hambrick, D. C 1996, Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations, West Publishing Company. Gong, Yaping, 2003, Subsidiary staffing in multinational enterprises: agency, resources, and performance, Academy of Management Journal, Dec2003, Vol. 46 Issue 6, p728-739. Haleblian, Jerayr and Finikelstein, 1993, Sydney Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental, Academy of Management Journal, Aug 93, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p844. Hambrick, Donald C; Mason, Phyllis A 1984, Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers, Academy of Management Review, Apr84, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p193-206. Hambrick, Donald C.; Cannella Jr, Albert A 2004, C.E.O. Who Have COOS: Contingency Analysis of an Explored Structural Form, Strategic Management Journal, Oct2004, Vol. 25 Issue 10, p959-979. Jarzabkowski, P, Searle, R 2003, “Top management team strategic capacity: diversity, collectivity & trust”, Aston Business School Research Papers. Lublin JS, 2005, October 31, Globalizing the Boardroom, The Wall Street Journal, B1, 3. Maclean, M, C. H Harvey and J Press, 2006, Business Elites and Corporate Governance in France and the UK, Palgrave Macmillian, London. Simons, Tony, 1995, Top management team consensus, heterogeneity, and debate as contingent predictors of company, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings. Tushman, Michael L. and Rosenkopf, Lori, 1996, Executive Succession, Strategic Reorientation and Performance Growth: A Longitudinal Study in the U.S. Cement Industry, Management Science, Jul96, Vol. 42 Issue 7, p939- 953. Tulung, Joy Elly, 2009, The Influence of Top Management Team Composition on Company Performance: The Case of Indonesian Mining Companies, Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis Integritas, Desember 2009 – Maret 2010, Vol. 2 No. 3, p169-181. Van Veen, Kees and Marsman, Ilse, 2008, How International are Executive boards of MNCs? Nationality Diversity in 15 European Cuntries, European Management Journal, Vol 26, Issue 3, June 2008, p188-198. www.bz.minbuza.nl http://www.economist.com/node/2142238?story_id=E1_NTQNNPR www.imf.org. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/79907 |