Biró, Flóra Panna and Márkus, Ádám and Erdey, László (2016): A kormányzás hatása a közvetlen külföldi tőkebefektetésekre Latin-Amerikában.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_80025.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines the impact of good governance on foreign direct investment in Latin American countries. According to the available literature the relation is generally positive i.e. good governance makes a country attractive. The relation is not obvious in case of Latin America and other developing countries as researchers found contradictory results. I was expecting a positive relation between the Worldwide Governance Indicators and FDI regarding the source countries, and opposite relation in case of the target countries. In theory it can be explained why high levels of corruption make the target country either more or less attractive. In order to have accurate results it is recommended to do the research for certain country groups. The study covers 18 Latin-American target countries, and 29 source countries that have been chosen from the largest investors in the World. Even though the FDI inflow is high - that can be explained by the level of development in the target countries, their connections with developed countries and the available natural resources - only a few papers have examined what determines capital flows in these countries. The time interval of the analysis is also an important factor in this case, as determinants of capital flows in the end of the 20th century differ from those of the beginning of the 21st century. The aim of my research is to find out whether these results contradicting most of the theory and empirical analysis still prevail in the region. This paper provides an explanation for these opposite findings, by focusing on previous studies with special attention to the relation between corruption and FDI. The gravity model was used for the empirical analysis, which is also a new approach to study FDI. WGI were included into the model as well, along with the basic explanatory variables of the equation. Separate tests were made for each governance indicator to avoid multicollinearity, and several model specifications and panel estimations were compared. Results according to the best model show that good governance is not always significant but mostly a factor of attractiveness.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A kormányzás hatása a közvetlen külföldi tőkebefektetésekre Latin-Amerikában |
English Title: | The effect of governance on foreign direct investment in Latin America |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | FDI, Governance, WGI, Gravity Equation, PPML |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F21 - International Investment ; Long-Term Capital Movements |
Item ID: | 80025 |
Depositing User: | Flóra Panna Biró |
Date Deposited: | 09 Jul 2017 13:49 |
Last Modified: | 04 Oct 2019 06:01 |
References: | ACEMOGLU, D. – ROBINSON, J.A. (2012): The persistance and change of institutions in the Americas. Southern Economic Journal, 75, pp. 282-299. AIDT, T.S. (2016): Rent seeking and economics of corruption. Constitutional Political Economy, 27, pp. 142-157. ALSHAMMARI, M. A. et al. (2015): Governance, regulations, trade openess and FDI inflows: Empirical study. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7, pp. 44-58. BELLOS, S. – SUBASAT, T. (2012a): Corruption and foreign direct investment: a panel gravity model approach. Bulletin of Economic Research, 64, pp. 565-574. BELLOS, S. – SUBASAT, T. (2012b): Governance and foreign direct investment: a panel gravity model approach. International Review of Applied Economics, 26, pp. 303-328. BELLOS, S. – SUBASAT, T. (2013): Governance and Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America: A panel gravity model approach. Latin American Journal of Economics, 50, pp. 107-131. BIGLAISER, G. – DERUEN, K.R. (2006): Economic reforms and inflows of Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 41, pp. 51-75. BIGLAISER, G. – STAATS, J.L. (2012): Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America: The importance of judicial stregth and rule of law. International Studies Quarterly, 56, pp. 193-202. BLONIGEN, B. A. – PIGER J. (2011): Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment. NBER Working Papers, 16704, Cambridge, NBER. CAETANO, G. (2011): MERCOSUR 20 anos. Uruguay, CEFIR. CARRÉRE, C. (2006): Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review, 50, pp. 223-247. COLE, M.A. et al. (2009): Corruption, governance and FDI Location in China: A province-level analysis. Journal of Development Studies, 45, pp. 1494-1512. DUNNING, J. (2004): Determinants of foreign direct investment globalization-induced changes and the roles of FDI policies. In: Toward Pro-Poor Policies. (edited by TUNGODDEN, B. et al.) Washington, World Bank, pp. 279-290. ERDEY, L. (2004): A működőtőke-áramlás a telephelyválasztás elméletének tükrében. Közgazdasági Szemle, 51, pp. 472-494. FRANKEL, J. (1997): Regional trading blocs in the World Economic System. Institute for International Economics. GARCÍA, E.C. et al. (2013): The gravity model analysis: an application on MERCOSUR trade flows. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 16, pp. 336-348. GLOBERMAN, S. (2004): Foreign Direct Investment in emerging and transition European countries. http://www.bowdoin.edu/~ytang/fdi-europe.pdf letöltés ideje: 2016.10.15. GODINEZ, J. – LIU, L. (2015): Corruption distance and FDI flows into Latin America. International Business Review, 24, pp. 33-42. GOLBERG, L. – Klein, M. (1997): Foreign direct investment, trade and real exchange rate linkages in Southeast Asia and Latin America. NBER Working Papers, 6344, Cambridge, NBER. GOUEL, C. et al. (2012): A foreign direct investment database for global CGE models. CEPII Working Papers. GOULD, D.M. (1998): Has NAFTA changed North American trade? Economic Review, p.12. HART, O. – MOORE, J. (2007): Incomplete contratcs and ownership: Some new thoughts. American Economic Review, 97, pp. 182-186. KAUFFMANN, D. – WEI, S.J. (1999): Does „grease money” speed up the wheels of commerce? World Bank Policy Reasearch Paper, 2254. KAUFMANN, D. – KRAAY, A. (2015): Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) Project. World Bank. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home Letöltés ideje: 2016.09.15. KOO, W.W. et al. (2006): Regional preferential trade agreements: trade creation and diversion effects. Review of Agricultural Economics, 28, pp. 408-415. LI, S. (2005): Why a poor governance environment does not deter foreign direct investment: The case of China and its implications for investment protection. Business Horizons, 48, pp. 297-302. LI, Q. – RESNICK, A. (2003): Reversal of fortunes: Democratic institutions and foreign direct investment inflows to developing countries. International Organization, 57, pp. 175-211. LINDERS, M. G-J. – GROOT, H.L.F. (2006): Estimation of the gravity equation in the presence of zero flow. Amsterdam, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 072/3. MELLO-SAMPAYO, F. (2009): Competing-destinations gravity model: an application to the geographic distribution of FDI. Applied Economics, 41, 2237-2253. MENGISTU, A.A. – ADHIKARY, B.K. (2011): Does good governance matter for FDI inflows? Evidence from Asian economies. Asia Pacific Business Review, 17, pp. 281-299. MÉON, P.G – SEKKAT, K. (2005): Does corruption grease or sand the wheels of growth? Public Choice, 122, pp. 69-97. MONTERO, A.P. (2008): The determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 43, pp. 55-83. MUDAMBI, R. et al.(2004): Market liberalization, corruption and FDI: a rent seeking approach. Institute of Global Management Studies, Discussion Paper 04-522. NAIM, M. (1999): Fads and fashion in economic reforms: Washington Consensus or Washington Confusion? Conference on Second Generation Reforms, Washington, https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/seminar/1999/reforms/Naim.HTM. Letöltés ideje: 2016.10.18. OECD (2002): Global forum on international investment, attracting Foreign Direct Investment for development. https://www.oecd.org/investment/investmentfordevelopment/2764407.pdf Letöltés ideje: 2016.10.20. PANIAGUA, J. et al. (2015): Quantile regression for the FDI gravity equation. Journal of Business Research, 68, pp. 1512-1518. QUIROGA, M. M. (2009): Corrupción y democracia. América Latina en perspectiva comparada. Gestión y Política Pública, 18, pp. 205-252. RUIZ PORRAS, A. et al. (2015): Gobernanza, distribución del ingreso y desempeno económico en América Latina. Nova Scientia, 7, pp. 616-643. SANTOS SILVA, J. – TENREYRO, S. (2006): The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, pp. 641-658. SANTOS SILVA, J. – TENREYRO, S. (2011): Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood estimator. Economics Letters, 112, pp. 220-222. TINBERGEN, J. (1962): Shaping the World Economy, Suggestions for an International Economic Policy. Twentieth Century Fund, New York. UNCTAD (2014): Bilateral FDI statistics. http://unctad.org/en/Pages/DIAE/FDI%20Statistics/FDI-Statistics-Bilateral.aspx Letöltés ideje: 2016.10.15. WANG, M. – WONG, S. (2009): Foreign Direct investment and economics growth: the growth accounting perspective. Economic Inquiry, 47, pp. 701-710. YOSHIMICHI, M. (2013): Trade policy and wage inequality in Chile since the 1990s. Chile, ECLAC. ZHANG, K.H. (2001): Does foreign direct investment promote economic growth? Evidence from East Asia and Latin America. Contemproary Economic Policy, 19, pp. 175-185. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/80025 |