Valencia-Toledo, Alfredo and Vidal-Puga, Juan (2017): A sequential bargaining protocol for land rental arrangements.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_80424.pdf Download (430kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We consider land rental between a single tenant and several lessors. The tenant should negotiate sequentially with each lessor for the available land. In each stage, we apply the Nash bargaining solution. Our results imply that, when all land is necessary, a fixed price per unit is more favourable for the tenant than a lessor-dependent price. Furthermore, a lessor is better off with a lessor-dependent price only when negotiating first. For the tenant, lessors' merging is relevant with lessor-dependent price but not with fixed price.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A sequential bargaining protocol for land rental arrangements |
English Title: | A sequential bargaining protocol for land rental arrangements |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Bargaining; non-cooperative game; Nash solution; land rental |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C78 - Bargaining Theory ; Matching Theory |
Item ID: | 80424 |
Depositing User: | Alfredo Valencia-Toledo |
Date Deposited: | 01 Aug 2017 05:24 |
Last Modified: | 21 Oct 2019 13:51 |
References: | BergantiƱos, G. and Lorenzo, L. (2004). A non-cooperative approach to the cost spanning tree problem. Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 59(3):393-403. Binmore, K., Rubinstein, A., and Wolinsky, A. (1986). The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling. The RAND Journal of Economics, pages 176-188. Hart, S. and Mas-Colell, A. (1996). Bargaining and value. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 357-380. Hart, S. and Mas-Colell, A. (2010). Bargaining and cooperation in strategic form games. Journal of the European Economic Association, 8(1):7-33. Matsushima, N. and Shinohara, R. (2015). The efficiency of monopolistic provision of public goods through simultaneous bilateral bargaining. Working paper. Moulin, H. (1984). Implementing the Kalai-Smorodinsky bargaining solution. Journal of Economic Theory, 33:32-45. Nash, J. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18(2):155-162. Nash, J. (1953). Two person cooperative games. Econometrica, 21:129-140. Papatya, D. and Trockel, W. (2016). On non-cooperative foundation and implementation of the Nash solution in subgame perfect equilibrium via Rubinstein's game. Journal of Mechanism and Institution Design, 1(1):83-107. Rubinstein, A. (1982). Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 50(1):97-109. Sarkar, S. (2017). Mechanism design for land acquisition. International Journal of Game Theory, 46(3):783-812. Sen, A. (2007). The theory of mechanism design: An overview. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(49):8-13. Sosa, I. (2011). License to operate: Indigenous relations and free prior and informed consent in the mining industry. Sustainalytics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Stahl, I. (1972). Bargaining theory. Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm. Trockel, W. (2002). A universal meta bargaining implementation of the Nash solution. Social Choice and Welfare, 19(3):581-586. Valencia-Toledo, A. and Vidal-Puga, J. (2017). Non-manipulable rules for land rental problems. Working paper, Universidade de Vigo. Van Damme, E. (1986). The Nash bargaining solution is optimal. Journal of Economic Theory, 38(1):78-100. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/80424 |