Collins, Sean M. and James, Duncan and Servátka, Maroš and Woods, Daniel (2017): Price-Setting and Attainment of Equilibrium: Posted Offers Versus An Administered Price.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_81489.pdf Download (370kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The operation of the posted offer market with advance production environment (Mestelman and Welland, 1988), appropriately parameterized, differs from that of the market entry game (Selten and Gueth, 1982), appropriately presented, only in terms of price-setting. We establish the effect of this difference in price-setting on attainment of the competitive equilibrium allocation while controlling for effects relating to the presentation of the market entry game and to the stationarity or non-stationarity of environment. Free posting of prices promotes convergence to the competitive equilibrium allocation, while the typical market entry game data can be characterized as displaying cycling prices.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Price-Setting and Attainment of Equilibrium: Posted Offers Versus An Administered Price |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | market entry game; posted offer market; advance production; isomorphism; equilibration |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design |
Item ID: | 81489 |
Depositing User: | Maroš Servátka |
Date Deposited: | 21 Sep 2017 23:27 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 07:48 |
References: | 1. Binmore, K. and J. Swierzbinski (2007) A Little Behavioralism Can Go a Long Way. In Does Game Theory Work? The Bargaining Challenge, ed. by K. Binmore, Cambridge: MIT Press, 257-276. 2. Camerer, C. and D. Lovallo (1999) Overconfidence and Excess Entry: an Experimental Approach. American Economic Review, 89, 306-318. 3. Cox, J. C. and D. James (2012) Clocks and Trees: Isomorphic Dutch Auctions and Centipede Games. Econometrica, 80, 883-903. 4. Duffy, J. and E. Hopkins (2005) Learning, Information, and Sorting in Market Entry Games: Theory and Evidence. Games and Economic Behavior, 51, 31-62. 5. Erev, I. and A. Rapoport (1998) Coordination, "Magic," and Reinforcement Learning in a Market Entry Game. Games and Economic Behavior, 23, 146-175. 6. Fischbacher, U. (2007) z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox For Ready-Made Economic Experiments. Experimental Economics, 10, 171-178. 7. Gary-Bobo, R. J. (1990) On the Existence of Equilibrium Points in a Class of Asymmetric Market Entry Games. Games and Economic Behavior, 2, 239-246. 8. Greiner, B. (2004): An Online Recruitment System for Economic Experiments. In Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen 2003, ed. by K. Kremer and V. Macho, Goettingen, 79-93. 9. Greiner, B.(2015) Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 1, 114-125. 10. Johnson, M. D. and C. R. Plott (1989) The effect of two trading institutions on price expectations and the stability of supply-response lag markets. Journal of Economic Psychology, 10, 189-216. 11. Kahneman, D. (1988) Experimental Economics: A Psychological Perspective. In Bounded Rational Behavior in Experimental Games and Markets, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 11-18. 12. Levitan, R. and M. Shubik (1972) Price Duopoly and Capacity Constraints. International Economic Review, 13, 111-122. 13. Mestelman, S. and D. Welland (1988) Advance Production in Experimental Markets. The Review of Economic Studies, 55, 641-654. 14. Plott, C. R. and V. L. Smith (1978) An Experimental Examination of Two Exchange Institutions. The Review of Economic Studies, 45, 133-153. 15. Rapoport, A. (1995) Individual Strategies in a Market Entry Game. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4, 117-133. 16. Selten, R. (1965) Spieltheoretische Behandlung eines Oligopolmodells mit Nachfragetraegheit. Zeitschrift fuer die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 121, 301-324. 17. Selten, R. (1975) Reexamination of the Perfectness Concept for Equilibrium Points in Extensive Games. International Journal of Game Theory, 4, 25-55. 18. Selten, R. and W. Gueth (1982) Equilibrium Point Selection in a Class of Market Entry Games. In Games, Economic Dynamics, and Time Series Analysis, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD, 101-116. 19. Sundali, J. A., A. Rapoport, and D. A. Seale (1995) Coordination in Market Entry Games with Symmetric Players. Organizational Behavior and Human Processes, 64, 203-218. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/81489 |