Mamoon, Dawood (2017): When is Trade Good for the Poor? Evidence from Recent Literature.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_82069.pdf Download (96kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper reviews recent literature that tries to find the relationship of trade with economic growth, poverty and inequality. The analysis suggests that trade may be good for the poor but if it leads to inequality especially in industrial wages, it may be detrimental to sustainable economic development. A valid strategy to make trade good for growth and the poor is to invest in education at all levels. A gender sensitive education policy may go a long way in sowing the seeds of better economic management.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | When is Trade Good for the Poor? Evidence from Recent Literature |
English Title: | When is Trade Good for the Poor? Evidence from Recent Literature |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Trade, Poverty, Inequality |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration |
Item ID: | 82069 |
Depositing User: | Dawood Mamoon |
Date Deposited: | 21 Oct 2017 10:29 |
Last Modified: | 10 Oct 2019 04:34 |
References: | Mamoon, D. ‘Formulating Effective Higher Education Policies under Millennium Development Goals,’ Journal of Educational Planning and Administration , 2007, 21(2), 93-106 Mamoon, D. ‘Which Institutions are more Relevant than Others in Inequality Mitigation?’ the Pakistan Development Review, 2006, 45(4), 893-911 Mamoon D. and M. Murhsed, ‘When Education explains Strong Institutions: Trade Policy Matters’, Social Research Indicators, Springer, 2017, 131(3), pp. 1179-1210 Mamoon, D. & S. M. Murshed ‘Education Bias of Trade Liberalisation and Wage Inequality in Developing Countries’, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, Routledge Press, Taylor and Francis Journals, 2013, 22(4), pp.572-604 Rodrik, D., A. Subramanian and F. Trebbi, “Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development,” Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2004, pp. 131-165 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/82069 |