Aggregation of Producer Durables with Exogenous Technical Change and Endogenous Useful lives

Bitros, George C. (2008): Aggregation of Producer Durables with Exogenous Technical Change and Endogenous Useful lives.

Abstract

The received theory of aggregation has been erected on certain fundamental hypotheses. One of them is that producer durables deteriorate exponentially, which implies that their replace-ment is proportional to the corresponding capital stocks. However the proportionality hypothesis conflicts with most of the available theoretical and empirical evidence. So an effort to relax it is long overdue. To this end the present paper investigates the conditions for consistent aggregation in a two-sector vintage capital model with exogenous technological change and endogenous use-ful lives. In the model aggregation is achieved by adaptation of the procedure first suggested by Haavelmo (1960). From the simulations of the solution with data from the United States in the post-war period it is found that the conventional approach to aggregation may be responsible for significant biases in the measurement of the economy-wide capital stock.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: E20
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E22 - Investment ; Capital ; Intangible Capital ; Capacity; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E01 - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth ; Environmental Accounts; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B4 - Economic Methodology > B41 - Economic Methodology

References

1. Bitros, G. C. (2008) “Whither the proportionality hypothesis,” Athens University of Eco-nomic and Business, Department of Economics, unpublished mimeo.

2. ---------------------- and Flytzanis, E. (2005) “On the Optimal Lifetime of Assets,” Athens University of Economic and Business, Department of Economics, Discussion paper No. 170.

3. Blitz, R. C. (1958), “Capital Longevity and Economic Development”, American Economic Review, 48, 313- 329.

4. Brown, M. and Chang, W. W. (1976) “Capital Aggregation in a General Equilibrium Model of Production,” Econometrica, 44, 1179-1200.

5. Brems, H. (1968), Quantitative Economic Theory: A Synthetic Approach, New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

6. Eisner, R. (1972) “Components of Capital Expenditures: Replacement and Modernization Versus Expansion,” Review of Economics and Statistics, LIV, 297-305.

7. Evans, P. (2000 “U.S. Stylized Facts and their Implications for Growth Theory,” Ohio State University, Department of Economics, unpublished Mimeo.

8. Fisher, F. M. (1965) “Embodied Technical Change and the Existence of an Aggregate Capital Stock,” Review of Economic Studies, 32, 263-268.

9. Green, J. H A. (1966) “Embodied Progress, Investment, and Growth,” American Eco-nomic Review, 56, 138-151.

10. Griliches, Z. (1963) “Capital Stock in Investment Functions: Some Problems of Concept and Measurement”, in Christ, C. et al. (eds.) Measurement in Eco-nomics, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

11. Haavelmo, T. (1960) A Study in the Theory of Investment, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

12. Hall, R. E. (1968) “Technical Change and Capital from the Point of View of the Dual,” Review of Economic Studies, 35, 35-46.

13. Harper, M. J. (1982), “The Measurement of Productive Capital Stock, Capital Wealth, and Capital Services,” U. S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Working Paper 128.

14. Hulten, C. R., Robertson, J.W. and Wykoff, F. (1989) “Energy, Obsolescence, and the Productivity Slowdown,” in D. W. Jorgenson and R. Landau (eds.) Technology and Capital Formation, Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 225-258.

15. Jorgenson, D. W. (1965) “Anticipations and Investment Behavior,” in The Brookings Quarterly Econometric Model of the United States Chicago: Rand McNally and Co, 35-92.

16. ------------------------ (1974) “The Economic Theory of Replacement and Depreciation,” in W. Sellekaerts (ed.) Econometrics and Economic Theory: Essays in Honour of Jan Tinbergen, New York: International Arts and Sci-ences Press.

17. Nickell, S, (1975) “A Closer Look at Replacement Investment,” Journal of Economic Theory, 10, 54-88.

1. Preinreich, G. A. D., (1940), “The Economic Life of Industrial Equipment”, Economet-rica, Vol. 8, pp. 12-44.

18. Robinson, J. (1953-54) “The Production Function and the Theory of Capital,” Review of Economic Studies, XXI, 81-106.

19. ----------------- (1959) “Some Problems of Definition and Measurement of Capital,” Ox-ford Economic Papers, 11, 157-166.

20. Samuelson, P. A. (1962) “Parable and Realism in Capital Theory: The Surrogate Produc-tion Function,” Review of Economic Studies, 29, 193-206.

21. ----------------- (1977) “Product Durability under Monopoly and Competition: Comment," Econometrica, 45, 229-236.

22. Smith, V. L., (1961), Investment and Production: A Study in the Theory of the Capital-Using Enterprise, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

23. Solow, R. M., (1955-1956) “The Production Function and The Theory of Capital,” Re-view of Economic Studies, 23, 101-108.

24. Terborgh, G., (1949), Dynamic Equipment Policy, New York: McGraw-Hill.

25. Westfield, F. M., (1958), “A Mathematical Note on Optimum Longevity,” American Eco-nomic Review, 48, 329-332.

26. Whitaker, J. K. (1966) “Vintage Capital Models and Econometric Production Functions,” Review of Economic Studies, 53, 1-18.

27. Zarembka, P. (1975) “Capital Heterogeneity, Aggregation, and the Two-Sector Model,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89, 103-114.