Firm-Specific Capital and the New Keynesian Phillips Curve

Woodford, Michael (2005): Firm-Specific Capital and the New Keynesian Phillips Curve. Published in: International Journal of Central Banking , Vol. Volume, No. Number 2 (1 September 2005): pp. 1-46.

Abstract

A relation between inflation and the path of average marginal cost (often measured by unit labor cost) implied by the Calvo (1983) model of staggered pricing – sometimes referred to as the "New Keynesian" Phillips curve – has been the subject of extensive econometric estimation and testing. Standard theoretical justifications of this form of aggregate-supply relation, however, either assume (1) the existence of a competitive rental market for capital services, so that the shadow cost of capital services is equated across firms and sectors at all points in time, despite the fact that prices are set at different times, or (2) that the capital stock of each firm is constant, or at any rate exogenously given, and so independent of the firm’s pricing decision. But neither assumption is realistic. The present paper examines the extent to which existing empirical specifications and interpretations of parameter estimates are compromised by reliance on either of these assumptions.

The paper derives an aggregate-supply relation for a model with monopolistic competition and Calvo pricing in which capital is firm specific and endogenous, and investment is subject to convex adjustment costs. The aggregate-supply relation is shown to again take the standard New Keynesian form, but with an elasticity of inflation with respect to real marginal cost that is a different function of underlying parameters than in the simpler cases studied earlier. Thus the relations estimated in the empirical literature remain correctly specified under the assumptions proposed here, but the interpretation of the estimated elasticity is different; in particular, the implications of the estimated Phillips-curve slope for the frequency of price adjustment is changed. Assuming a rental market for capital results in a substantial exaggeration of the infrequency of price adjustment; assuming exogenous capital instead results in a smaller underestimate.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Subjects: G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G00 - General; G - Financial Economics > G0 - General

References

Altig, David, Lawrence J. Christiano, Martin Eichenbaum, and Jesper Linde. 2005. “Firm-Specific Capital, Nominal Rigidities and the Business Cycle.” NBERWorking Paper No. 11034 (January).

Ball, Laurence, and David Romer. 1990. “Real Rigidities and the Non-neutrality of Money.” Review of Economic Studies 57:183–203.

Bils, Mark, and Peter Klenow. 2004. “Some Evidence on the Importance of Sticky Prices.” Journal of Political Economy 112:947–85.

Blinder, Alan S., Elie R.D. Canetti, David E. Lebow, and Jeremy B. Rudd. 1998. Asking About Prices: A New Approach to Understanding Price Stickiness. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

Calvo, Guillermo A. 1983. “Staggered Prices in a Utility-Maximizing Framework.” Journal of Monetary Economics 12:383–98.

Chari, V. V., Patrick J. Kehoe, and Ellen R. McGrattan. 2000. “Sticky Price Models of the Business Cycle: Can the Contract Multiplier Solve the Persistence Problem?” Econometrica 68:1151–79.

Coenen, G¨unter, and Andrew T. Levin. 2004. “Identifying the Influences of Nominal and Real Rigidities in Aggregate Price- Setting Behavior.” European Central Bank Working Paper No.418 (November).

Eichenbaum, Martin, and Jonas Fisher. 2004. “Evaluating the Calvo Model of Sticky Prices.” NBERWorking Paper No. 10617 (June).

Gal´ı, Jordi, and Mark Gertler. 1999. “Inflation Dynamics: A Structural Econometric Analysis.” Journal of Monetary Economics 44:195–222.

Gal´ı, Jordi, Mark Gertler, and J. David Lopez-Salido. 2001. “European Inflation Dynamics.” European Economic Review 45:1237–70.

Kimball, Miles. 1995. “The Quantitative Analytics of the Basic Neomonetarist Model.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 27:1241–77.

Matheron, Julien. 2005. “Firm-Specific Labor vs. Firm-Specific Capital: Implication for the Euro Date New Phillips Curve.” Unpublished Manuscript, Banque de France (February).

Rotemberg, Julio J., and Michael Woodford. 1995. “Dynamic General Equilibrium Models with Imperfectly Competitive Product Markets.” In Frontiers of Business Cycle Research, ed. Thomas F. Cooley. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sbordone, Argia M. 1998. “Prices and Unit Labor Costs: A New Test of Price Stickiness.” IIES Seminar Paper No. 653, Stockholm University (October).

———. 2002. “Prices and Unit Labor Costs: A New Test of Price Stickiness.” Journal of Monetary Economics 49:265–92.

———. 2004. “Do Expected Future Marginal Costs Drive Inflation Dynamics?” Unpublished Manuscript, Rutgers University (February).

Sveen, Tommy, and Lutz Weinke. 2004a. “Pitfalls in the Modeling of Forward-Looking Price Setting and Investment Decisions.” Unpublished Manuscript, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (February).

———. 2004b. “New Perspectives on Capital and Sticky Prices.” Unpublished Manuscript, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (February).

Woodford, Michael. 2003. Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

———. 2004. “Inflation and Output Dynamics with Firm-Specific Investment.” Unpublished Manuscript, Princeton University (May).

Yun, Tack. 1996. “Nominal Price Rigidity, Money Supply Endogeneity, and Business Cycles.” Journal of Monetary Economics 37:345–70.