Tarasov, Alexander (2007): Income Distribution, Market Structure, and Individual Welfare.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_8250.pdf Download (293kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper explores how income distribution influences market structure and affects the economic well-being of different groups. It shows that inequality may be good for the poor via a trickle-down effect operating through entry. I consider a general equilibrium model of monopolistic competition with free entry, heterogenous firms and consumers that share identical but non-homothetic preferences. The general model is solved. The case of two types of consumers, rich and poor, is considered in detail. I show that higher income inequality in the economy can benefit the poor. An increase in personal income of the rich raises welfare of the poor, while an increase in the fraction of the rich has an ambiguous impact on the poor: welfare of the poor has an inverted U shape as a function of the fraction of the rich. At the same time, an increase in the personal income of the rich together with a decrease in the fraction of the rich, keeping the aggregate income in the economy fixed, raises the well-being of the poor. I also analyze the effect of changes in market size and entry cost. I show that the rich gain more from an increase in market size and lose more from an increase in the cost of entry than the poor.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Income Distribution, Market Structure, and Individual Welfare |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | firm heterogeneity; monopolistic competition; non-homothetic preferences; free entry |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure ; Size Distribution of Firms D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection |
Item ID: | 8250 |
Depositing User: | Alexander Tarasov |
Date Deposited: | 13 Apr 2008 00:28 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 06:09 |
References: | AGHION, P. and BOLTON, P. (1997), "A Theory of Trickle-Down Growth and Development", Review of Economic Studies, 64, 151--172. ALESINA, A. and RODRIK, D. (1994), "Distributive Politics and Economic Growth", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 465-490. ATKINSON, A. and BOURGUIGNON, F. (2000), "Income Distribution and Economics" In A. Atkinson and F. Bourguignon (eds.), Handbook of Income Distribution. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1--58. FLAM, H. and HELPMAN, E. (1987), "Vertical Product Differentiation and North-South Trade", The American Economic Review, 77, 810-822. FOELLMI, R. and ZWEIMUELLER, J. (2004), "Inequality, Market Power, and Product Diversity", Economic Letters, 82, 139-145. FOELLMI, R. and ZWEIMUELLER, J. (2006), "Income Distribution and Demand-induced Innovations", Review of Economic Studies, 73, 941-960. GLAESER, E., SCHEINKMAN, J., and SHLEIFER, A. (2003), "The Injustice of Inequality", Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 199-222 KRISHNA, K. and YAVAS, C. (2001), "Wage Equality in a General Equilibrium Model with Indivisibilities", Pennsylvania State University manuscript KRISHNA, K. and YAVAS, C. (2004), "Lumpy Consumer Durables, Market Power, and Endogenous Business Cycles", Canadian Journal of Economics, 37, 375-391. KRISHNA, K. and YAVAS, C. (2005), "When Trade Hurts: Consumption, Indivisibilities and Labor Market Distortions", Journal of International Economics, 67, 413-427. MARKUSEN, J. (1986), "Explaining the Volume of Trade: An Eclectic Approach", The American Economic Review, 76, 1002--1011 MATSUYAMA, K. (2000), " A Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods under Nonhomothetic Preferences: Demand Complementarities, Income Distribution, and North-South Trade", Journal of Political Economy, 108, 1093-1120 MELITZ, M. (2003), "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity", Econometrica, 71, 1695-1725 MELITZ, M. and OTTAVIANO, G. (2005), "Market Size, Trade, and Productivity", Review of Economic Studies, forthcoming. MITRA, D. and TRINDADE, V. (2005), "Inequality and Trade", Canadian Journal of Economics, 38, 1253-1271. MURPHY, K., SHLEIFER, A., and VISHNY, R. (1989), "Income Distribution, Market Size, and Industrialization", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 537--64. PERSSON, T. and TABELLINI, G. (1994), "Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?", The American Economic Review, 84, 600-621. STOKEY, N. (1991), "The Volume and Composition of Trade between Rich and Poor Countries", Review of Economic Studies, 58, 63-80. WALDMANN, R. (1992), "Income Distribution and Infant Mortality", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 57, 1283-1302. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/8250 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Income Distribution, Market Structure, and Individual Welfare. (deposited 12 Mar 2008 01:43)
- Income Distribution, Market Structure, and Individual Welfare. (deposited 13 Apr 2008 00:28) [Currently Displayed]