Inequality, imperfect competition, and fiscal policy

Balamatsias, Pavlos (2017): Inequality, imperfect competition, and fiscal policy.

Abstract

This paper analyses a simple model of an economy with imperfect competition in the goods markets and heterogeneous individuals due to different skill endowments. We then examine how the combination of income inequality, and imperfect competition, affect taxing and spending policies. Results indicate that firms’ market power and income inequality positively affect the size of fiscal multipliers, meaning that spending and taxing multipliers are bigger the more unequal an economy is. We also use the balanced budget multiplier to examine how income inequality and imperfect competition affect the net increase in output and expenditure caused by fiscal policies. The model shows that in highly unequal societies the maximum net increase in output and expenditure comes when increased government spending is funded by taxing the minority of high-income workers, as the adverse effects on the economy will be smaller compared to a tax imposed on the majority. However, this result changes as the economy becomes more equal and for high enough percentages of the population belonging in the high-income group the maximum net increase in output and expenditure comes when the government increases government spending and taxes low-income people instead. Finally, we examine the welfare effects of government policies. We see that while taxes reduce taxpayers’ welfare, if the net increase in output and expenditure is big enough, fiscal policy can be Pareto improving, as both income groups benefit from it; or at least the income group not paying taxes benefits while the income group paying taxes is not worse off. Income inequality is once again crucial in our analysis as it affects the size of welfare losses the taxpaying segments of the population have and whether government policies can be Pareto improving.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Income inequality, Fiscal multiplier, Public Expenditure, Taxation
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy

References

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2005). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Adam, A. (2004). Macroeconomic effects of social security privatization in a small unionized economy.

Blanchard, O., & Johnson, D. (2012). Macroeconomics . Millersville University.

Bouakez, H., & Rebei, N. (2007). Why does private consumption rise after a government spending shock?. Canadian Journal of Economics/

Carroll, C. D., Slacalek, J., & Tokuoka, K. (2014). The Distribution of wealth and the MPC: implications of new European data. The American Economic Review, 104(5), 107111.

Carroll, C., Slacalek, J., Tokuoka, K., & White, M. N. (2016). The Distribution of Wealth and the Marginal Propensity to Consume.

Ercolani, V. (2007) The relation between private consumption and government spending: theory and some evidence from a DSGE approach FIRST DRAFT.

Forni, L., Gerali, A., & Pisani, M. (2010). The macroeconomics of fiscal consolidations in euro area countries. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(9),1791-1812.

Kreutzer, D., & Lee, D. R. (1988). Tax Evasion and Monopoly Output Decisions: AReply. National Tax Journal, 41, 583.

Lee, K. (1998). Tax evasion, monopoly, and nonneutral profit taxes. National Tax Journal, 333-338.

Lerner, A. P. "The Concept of Monopoly and the Measurement of Monopoly Power." The Review of Economic Studies 1.3 (1934): 157-175.

Mankiw, N. G. (1987). Imperfect Competition and the Keynesian Cross (No. 2386).National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

Molana, H., & Moutos, T. (1992). A note on taxation, imperfect competition and the balanced budget multiplier. Oxford Economic Papers, 44(1), 68-74.

Harvey, R., & Gayer, T. (2013). Public finance. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Torregrosa, R. J. (1999). Balanced budget multiplier, imperfect competition and indirect taxation. IVIE, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas.