Hegadekatti, Kartik (2017): The Right to Money as the Fundamental Right of Individuals in the Coming Digital Economy. Published in: Poverty, Income Distribution & Income Assistance eJournal , Vol. 09, No. 08 (5 May 2017)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_82836.pdf Download (139kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Poverty has been a common feature in all human societies since the dawn of civilization. Purchasing power of an individual decides her standard of living. In many cases, it even decides whether a person can live or not (eg: in starvation or malnourishment, victims have no purchasing power to buy calories). As such, the Right to Life philosophy of many National Constitutions comes to naught if the state cannot ensure adequate purchasing power for its people. Thus, an individual should have Right to Money in order to live with respect and dignity. In this paper, we will explore the concept of the Right to Money and how it is linked to the Right to Life.
We will see how the Right to Money concept can ensure a continued economic expansion even in a scenario when automation has reached a critical point (i.e Technological Singularity). Right to Money can also ensure continued human dominance over Machine Intelligence as and when they arise. Interestingly the Right to Money leads to another advanced concept – The Right to Machines which will make certain that there is continued synergy between human and artificial intelligence in future and that the Human race stays relevant. The paper concludes as to how human society can be best prepared economically (or otherwise) for a Post-Technological Singularity scenario.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Right to Money as the Fundamental Right of Individuals in the Coming Digital Economy |
English Title: | The Right to Money as the Fundamental Right of Individuals in the Coming Digital Economy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Right to Life, Economic Right, Money, Life |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D31 - Personal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P24 - National Income, Product, and Expenditure ; Money ; Inflation P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P36 - Consumer Economics ; Health ; Education and Training ; Welfare, Income, Wealth, and Poverty P - Economic Systems > P4 - Other Economic Systems > P48 - Political Economy ; Legal Institutions ; Property Rights ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Regional Studies Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation |
Item ID: | 82836 |
Depositing User: | Dr Kartik Hegadekatti |
Date Deposited: | 25 Nov 2017 15:27 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 01:11 |
References: | [1] http://www.poverty.com/ [2] http://www.acting-man.com/?p=32134 Retrieved 04 april 2017 [3] "Forum Debate: Rethinking Technology and Employment <--Centrality of work, 1:02 - 1:04 -->". World Economic Forum. Jan 2014.Retrieved 14 July 2015. [4] "Martin Ford Asks: Will Automation Lead to Economic Collapse?" SingularityHub. December 15, 2009. Retrieved June 22, 2015 [5] Singularity hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment. Dordrecht: Springer. 2012. pp. 1–2. ISBN 9783642325601 [6] Hegadekatti, Kartik, Automation Processes and Blockchain Systems (December 27, 2016). [7] Moseley, Daniel, A Lockean Argument for Basic Income (June 25,2011). Basic Income Studies, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2011. [8]https://fee.org/articles/a-universal-basic-income-would-meanmassive-tax-hikes/ [9] "Deutscher Bundestag – Problematische Auswirkungen auf Arbeitsanreize" (in German). Bundestag.de. Retrieved 5 June 2016 [10] Hegadekatti, Kartik, Regulating the Deep Web Through Controlled Blockchains and Crypto-Currency Networks (December 22, 2016). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/82836 |