Trust as a Skill: Applying Psychological Models of Skill Acquisition to Explain the Social Trust Formation Process

Tamilina, Larysa and Tamilina, Natalya (2017): Trust as a Skill: Applying Psychological Models of Skill Acquisition to Explain the Social Trust Formation Process. Forthcoming in: Psychology and Developing Societies , Vol. 30(1), (2018)

Abstract

This study uses psychological models of skill acquisition to explain how social trust is formed. We view trust as being shaped by four factors: crystallized, cognitive, contact, and context. We combine these four factors into a 4C-component analytical model by establishing links between them and explaining the rationale behind their individual and joint effects on trust. The proposed model is tested with the PIAAC public-use data. Both theoretical and empirical elaborations suggest that context is the strongest driver of trust formation. Good contexts also spur more trust when individuals already possess crystallized knowledge and can display faith in others. Such knowledge can be learned if it is missing, but how efficiently depends on the quality of one’s cognitive system, frequency of contacts with others, and the distance between one’s actual knowledge of trust and the optimal trust level for the given context.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: social trust; trust formation; psychology of skill acquisition; PIAAC
• Subjects: Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z10 - General; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Anderson, J.R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369–406. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.369

Anderson, J.R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problems situations. Psychological Review, 94, 192–201. doi:10.1037/ 0033-295X.94.2.192

Anderson, J.R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York: Oxford University Press.

Blau, F.D., & Kahn, L.M. (2005). Do cognitive test scores explain higher US wage inequality? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 184–193. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40042932

Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 999–1023. doi:10.2307/2111684

Christoforou, A. (2004, September). On the determinants of social capital in countries of the European Union. Paper prepared for the ESPAnet conference, Oxford, England. Retrieved from http://old.phs.uoa.gr/~ahatzis/Christoforou.pdf

Cunha, F., & Heckman, J.J. (2008). Technology of cognitive and non-cognitive skill formation. The Journal of Human Resources, 43(4), 738–782. doi: 10.3368/jhr.43.4.738

Farell, H. (2005). Trust and political economy. Comparative Political Studies, 38(5), 459–483. doi: 10.1177/0010414004273506

Fidrmuc, J. (2003). Economic reform, democracy and growth during post-communist transition. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(3), 583–604. doi:10.1016/S0176-2680(03)00010-7

Fukuyama, F. (2000). Social capital and civil society. IMF Working paper No. 00/74, Washington.

Grund, C., & Harbring, C. (2009). Trust and control at the workplace: Evidence from representative samples of employees in Europe. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4297, IZA, Bonn.

Hall, P.A. (1999). Social capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 29(3), 417–461. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/british-journal-of-political-science/article/div-classtitlesocial-capital-in-britaindiv/4FA6149F13222618A5DFB8A1168291C8

Hanushek, E.A., Woessman, L., & Zhang, L. (2011). General education, vocational education and labor-market outcomes over the life-cycle. CESifo Working paper No. 3614, IFO, Munich.

Herreros, F., & Criado, H. (2008). The state and the development of social trust. International Political Science Review, 29(1), 53–71. doi: 10.1177/0192512107083447

Keeley, B. (2007). Human capital: How what you know shapes your life. Paris: OECD.

Keil, F.C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Kuckulenz, A., & Zwick, T. (2003). The Impact of training on earnings - differences between participant groups and training forms. ZEW Discussion paper No. 03-57, Center for European Economic Research, Manheim.

Luke, D.A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

McCormick, E.J. (1976). Job and task analysis. In M.D. Dunette (Ed.), Handbook of organizational and industrial psychology (pp. 665–696). Chicago: Rand McNally.

Newton, K. (1999a). Social trust and democracy in modern Europe. In J. van Deth, M. Maraffi, K. Newton, & P. Whiteley (Eds.), Social capital and European democracy (pp. 3–24). London: Routledge.

Newton, K. (1999b). Social and political trust in established democracies. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government (pp. 169–187). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

OECD. (2001). Well-being of nations. The role of human and social capital. Center for Educational Research and Innovation. Paris: OECD.

Paxton, P. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 254–277. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088895

Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 129–154. doi:10.1080/713752551

Putnam, R. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. doi:10.1353.jod.1995.0002

Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2001, November). Social capital and street-level bureaucracy: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Paper prepared for “Trust in Government Conference” at the Centre for the Study of Democratic Politics, Princeton University. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R.J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to the basic and advanced modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Taatgen, N.A. (2005). Modeling parallelization and flexibility improvements in skill acquisition: From dual tasks to complex dynamic skills. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 421–455.

Taatgen, N.A. (2007). The minimal control principle. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated model of cognitive systems (pp. 368–379). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Taatgen, N.A., Huss, D., Dickison, D., & Anderson, J.R. (2008). The acquisition of robust and flexible cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(3), 548–565. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.3.548

Van Oorschot, W., & Arts, W. (2005). The social capital of European Welfare States: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy, 15(1), 5-26. doi: 10.1177/0958928705049159

Wittenbrink, B., Hilton, J.L., & Gist, P.L. (1998). In search of similarity: Stereotypes as naive theories in social categorization. Social Cognition, 16(1), 31–55. doi:10.1521/soco.1998.16.1.31