An Assessment of the Efficacy of Delivering the Annual Development Program in Bangladesh

Mostafa Amir, Sabbih (2017): An Assessment of the Efficacy of Delivering the Annual Development Program in Bangladesh.

Abstract

In order to achieve the goal of reaching a middle-income country status by 2021, Bangladesh requires increased public investment, particularly in order to close severe education, health, and infrastructure gaps. The major proportion of public investment in Bangladesh is channeled through the Annual Development Program (ADP).The government takes many projects every year for implementation in the ADP but a significant proportion of these projects are revised by cost escalation with time overrun as the implementation status remains poor. This study aims to assess and diagnose the ADP execution process against a sound public investment management framework, to identify the barriers responsible for poor implementation of ADP; and to recommend policy options to raise the efficacy of delivering ADP. The assessment of this study, using secondary data, found a weak project screening and appraisal status in the project preparation stage. This is supported by the finding of inadequate independent review of project proposals (e.g. log frames and CBA), as well as the practice of pervasive and increasing allocations to symbolic (small) projects and the substantial growth in the number of unapproved new projects. Although a significant improvement has been achieved in the ADP execution rate in the last two decades particularly for GOB projects (89 per cent), the execution rate of DP assisted projects (72 per cent) lags far behind. Furthermore, the evidence of fourth quarter syndrome suggests significant potential problems regarding the spending quality, and therefore the continued presence of project preparation and implementation weaknesses. In addition, the large share of projects which were declared completed despite not being 100 per cent complete indicates the necessity of reviewing and rationalizing quality of ADP spending. Two key indicators for evaluating the PIM system effectiveness are cost and time over-run. While some the average cost overrun showed some improvement in recent years, the average cost overrun is still on an increasing trend. Weaknesses in project preparation, financing, and execution are likely to have contributed to such inefficiency. Finally, inadequate follow-up on the recommendations generated from external audits, as well as IMED impact evaluations and lack of attention to the operation and maintenance of newly created assets are the two other critically important factors which hamper the efficacy of ADP delivery of Bangladesh. Therefore, the currents study recommends that these weaknesses should be addressed in the short, medium and long term to increase the effectiveness of PIM system in Bangladesh.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Public investment management, annual development program, efficacy, economic growth.
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies

References

Albino-War, M., Cerovic, S., Grigoli, F., Flores, J.C.; Kapsoli, J., Qu, H., Said, Y., Shukurov, B., Sommer, M. & Yoon, S.H. (2014). Making the Most of Public Investment in MENA and CCA Oil-Exporting Countries. Staff Discussion Note 14/10. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

Balassone, F. & Franco, D. (2000). Public Investment, the Stability Pact, and the Golden Rule. Rome: Banca d’Italia (Institute for Fiscal Studies).

Chakraborty, S. & Dabla-Norris, E. (2009). The Quality of Public Investment. IMF Working Paper WP/09/154. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

Centre for Policy Dialogue. (2009). State of the Bangladesh economy in FY2007-08 and outlook for FY2008-09. Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).

———. (2010). Delivering on Budget FY2009-10 in State of the Bangladesh economy in FY2008-09 and outlook for FY2009-10. Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).

———. (2011). Bangladesh economy in FY2010-11: second interim review of macroeconomic performance. Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD).

———. (2015). An analysis of the national budget for FY2015-16 (Media Briefing). Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD). Retrieved from http://cpd.org.bd/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Centre-for-Policy-Dialogue-CPD-Analysis-National-Budget-FY2015-16-June-2015.pdf.

———. (2016a). An analysis of the national budget for FY2016-17 (Media Briefing). Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD). Retrieved from http://cpd.org.bd/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Analysis-of-the-National-Budget-FY-2016-17-Powerpoint.pdf

———. (2016b). State of the Bangladesh Economy in FY2015-16: Third Reading. Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD). Retrieved from http://cpd.org.bd/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/IRBD-FY16-Third-Reading-FINAL_Revised.pdf

———. (2016c). State of the Bangladesh Economy in FY2016 (Second Reading). Dhaka: Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD). Retrieved from http://cpd.org.bd/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/CPD-Budget-Proposal-for-FY17.pdf

Creel, J., Monperrus-Veroni, P. & Saraceno, F. (2007). Has the Golden Rule of Public Finance Made a Difference in the UK?. Paris: Observatoire Francais des Conjonctures Economiques.

Dabla-Norris, E., Brumby, J., Kyobe, A., Mills, Z. & Papageorgiou, C. (2012). Investing in Public Investment: An Index of Public Investment Efficienc. Journal of Economic Growth, 17: 235–66.

Fainboim, I., Last, D. & Tandberg, E. (2013). Managing Public Investment. In Cangiano, M., T. Curristine, and M. Lazare (Ed.) Public Financial Management and Its Emerging Architecture.Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund.

Flyvbjerg, B. (2009). Survival of the unfittest: why the worst infrastructure gets built—and what we can do about it. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(3): 344–67.

Ghazanchyan, M. & Stotsky, J. (2013). Drivers of Growth: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. IMF Working Paper WP/13/236. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

Grigoli, F., and Mills, Z. (2014). Institutions and Public Investment: An Empirical Analysis. Economics of Governance, 15(2): 131–53.

Gupta, S., Kangur, A., Papageorgiou, C. & Wane, A. (2014). Efficiency-Adjusted Public Capital and Growth. World Economic Development, 57(C): 164–78.

Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division. (2003). Barshik Unnayan Karmashuchi (ADP) Bastobayon Ogrogoti Porjalochona Protibedon (in Bangla) FY2002-03. Dhaka: Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED).

———. (2009). Barshik Unnayan Karmashuchi (ADP) Bastobayon Ogrogoti Porjalochona Protibedon (in Bangla) FY2007-08. Dhaka: Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED).

———. (2010). Barshik Unnayan Karmashuchi (ADP) Bastobayon Ogrogoti Porjalochona Protibedon (in Bangla) FY2009-10. Dhaka: Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED).

———. (2012). Barshik Unnayan Karmashuchi (ADP) Bastobayon Ogrogoti Porjalochona Protibedon (in Bangla) FY2011-12. Dhaka: Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED).

———. (2014). Barshik Unnayan Karmashuchi (ADP) Bastobayon Ogrogoti Porjalochona Protibedon (in Bangla) FY2012-13. Dhaka: Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division (IMED).

International Monetary Fund. (2014). Is It Time for an Infrastructure Push? The Macroeconomic Effects of Public Investment. In Abdul Abiad and others (Ed.) World Economic Outlook, October 2014, Legacies, Clouds, Uncertainties [Chapter 3]. pp. 75-114. Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund.

———. (2015). Making public investment more efficient. Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund.

Keefer, P., and Knack, S. (2007). Boondoggles, Rent-seeking, and Political Checks and Balances: Public Investment under Unaccountable Governments. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3): 566–72.

Kettlewell, A., Mazumder, M., de Groot, A., Hiddink, C. & Dimitrova, D. (2014). Review of Spikes in Development Expenditure in the Fourth Quarter. Washington, D.C: World Bank.

Mujeri, M.K. & Alam, S. (2011). Sixth Five Year Plan of Bangladesh 2011-2015: Background Papers. Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies.

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2014). Recommendation of the council on effective public investment across levels of government. Paris: OECD.

Rajaram, A., Minh Le, T., Biletska, N. & Brumby, J. (2010). A Diagnostic Framework for Assessing Public Investment Management. Policy Research Working Paper 5397. Washington, D.C: World Bank.

Rajaram, A., Minh Le, T., Kaiser, K., Kim, J.H. & Frank, J. (2014). The Power of Public Investment Management: Transforming Resources into Assets for Growth. Washington, D.C: World Bank.

Schaechter, A., Kinda, T., Budina, N. & Weber, A. (2012). Fiscal Rules in response to the Crisis-Toward the “Next-Generation Rules: A New Dataset. IMF Working Paper WP/12/187. Washington, D.C: International Monetary Fund.

Tanzi, V., and Davoodi, H. (1997). Corruption, Public Investment, and Growth. IMF Working Paper No. 97/139. Washington: International Monetary Fund.

World Bank. (2010). Bangladesh Public Expenditure and Institutional Review: Towards a Better Quality of Public Expenditure. Washington, DC: World Bank.

———. (2011). The quality of public investment management in Bangladesh. Washington, DC: World Bank.

World Bank and Asian Development Bank. (2003). Bangladesh Public Expenditure Review. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/161111468003913312/pdf/multi0page.pdf