Balamatsias, Pavlos (2018): Democracy and government spending.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_84975.pdf Download (299kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this paper, we argue that democracies positively affect government expenditure. We hypothesize that democracies produce more public goods for their citizens because they are better at using tax revenues, while autocracies misappropriate taxes. We empirically test the validity of this argument using data on 61 countries from 1993 to 2012. The explanatory variable used is a dichotomous measure of democracy, but we alter our analysis from earlier research by assuming that democracy is not an exogenous variable based on the theory of Huntington (1991) and the methodology of Acemoglu, Naidu, Restpero and Robinson (2014) and Balamatsias (2017a) about regional democratization waves. According to this theory, democratization occurs in regional waves; consequently, diffusion of demand for or discontent with a political system is easier to happen in countries in the same area due to socio-political and historical similarities. This measure shows us that demand for or discontent with a political system in a geographical area influences the power of a country’s political regime and its effect on government policies. Our results using a number of estimations and robustness tests show us that regional democratization waves positively correlate with democracy. Furthermore, our main 2SLS regression as well as our OLS, fixed effects and GMM estimations show us that democracy increases production of public goods and services and education spending. When controlling for a smaller dataset, without African and Middle-eastern countries our first-stage results remain the same and the positive effect of democracy on government spending is now quantitatively bigger suggesting wealthier democracies produce more public goods and services when compared to poorer ones. This hypothesis is further substantiated when we use a sample consisting of non-OECD countries and find that democracy has no effect on government spending. Our results show that democracies where large segments of the population belong in the middle-income class, vote in favour of these policies because they can utilize government spending to increase production and output, lower inequality and attract foreign capital, unlike poorer democracies.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Democracy and government spending |
English Title: | Democracy and government spending |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Democracy, Political development, Regional democratization waves, Fiscal policy, Government expenditures |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy |
Item ID: | 84975 |
Depositing User: | Pavlos Balamatsias |
Date Deposited: | 08 Mar 2018 03:46 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 14:41 |
References: | Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2000a). Democratization or repression? European Economic Review, 44(4), 683-693. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2000b). Why did the West extend the franchise? Democracy, inequality, and growth in historical perspective. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1167-1199. Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., & Robinson, J. A. (2014). Democracy does cause growth (No. w20004). National Bureau of Economic Research. Auclert, A., & Rognlie, M. (2016). Inequality and Aggregate Demand. Aidt, T. S., & Jensen, P. S. (2009). The taxman tools up: An event history study of the introduction of the personal income tax. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1), 160- 175. Argimón, I., González-Páramo, J. M., & Alegre, J. M. R. (1995). Does public spending crowd out private investment? Evidence from a panel of 14 OECD countries (No. 9523). Balamatsias, P. (2017a). Democracy and taxation. Economics Discussion Papers, No 2017-100. Kiel Institute for the World Economy. http://www. economics-ejournal. org/economics/discussionpapers/2017-100 Page, 2(2). Balamatsias, P. (2017b). Inequality, imperfect competition, and fiscal policy. MPRA Paper 82178 University Library of Munich, Germany. Baum, C. (2008, July). Using instrumental variables techniques in economics and finance. In German Stata Users' Group Meetings. Stata Users Group. Bloom, D. E., Chatterji, S., Kowal, P., Lloyd-Sherlock, P., McKee, M., Rechel, B., ...& Smith, J. P. (2015). Macroeconomic implications of population ageing and selected policy responses. The Lancet, 385(9968), 649-657. Boix, C. (2001). Democracy, development, and the public sector. American Journal of Political Science, 1-17. Drazen, A., & Eslava, M. (2010). Electoral manipulation via voter-friendly spending: Theory and evidence. Journal of development economics, 92(1), 39-52. Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (2003). Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American political science review, 97(1), 75-90. Hausken, K., Martin, C. W., & Plümper, T. (2004). Government spending and taxation in democracies and autocracies. Constitutional Political Economy, 15(3), 239-259. Helliwell, J.F., (1994). Empirical linkages between democracy and economic growth. British journal of political science, 24(2), pp.225-248. Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century (Vol. 4). University of Oklahoma press. Lassila, J., Valkonen, T., & Alho, J. M. (2014). Demographic forecasts and fiscalpolicy rules. International Journal of Forecasting, 30(4), 1098-1109. Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. The Journal of Political Economy, 914-927. Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1983). Tests of a rational theory of the size of government. Public Choice, 41(3), 403-418. Mutascu, M. (2011). Taxation and democracy. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 14(4), 343-348. Mutascu, M., & Danuletiu, D. (2013). The literacy impact on tax revenues (No. 2013-63). Economics Discussion Papers. Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (2006). Democracy and development: The devil in the details. American Economic Review, 96(2), pp.319-324. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2009). Democratic capital: The nexus of political and economic change (No. w12175). National Bureau of Economic Research. Profeta, P., Puglisi, R., & Scabrosetti, S. (2013). Does democracy affect taxation and government spending? Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 41(3), 684-718. Rodrik, D., (1999). Democracies pay higher wages. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3), pp.707-738. Schulze, G. G., & Ursprung, H. W. (1999). Globalisation of the Economy and the Nation State. The World Economy, 22(3), 295-352. Wintrobe, R. (2001). How to understand, and deal with dictatorship: an economist'sview. Economics of Governance, 2(1), 35-58. Xu, X., & Yan, Y. (2014). Does government investment crowd out private investmentin China?. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(1), 1-12. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/84975 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Democracy and government spending. (deposited 08 Mar 2018 03:46) [Currently Displayed]