Is Economic Growth Pro-Poor in Vietnam? Evidence from the Period 1993-1998

Nguyen, Cuong (2004): Is Economic Growth Pro-Poor in Vietnam? Evidence from the Period 1993-1998.

Abstract

Economic reforms initiated in the late 1980s significantly changed the economy of Vietnam from severe crisis in the 1980s to high growth with an average annual rate of nearly 6% in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita during the 1990s. These economic achievements in turn resulted in significant success in poverty reduction. Between 1993 and 1998, the percentage of the population that was poor declined considerably from 58.1% to 37.4%. This paper found that the “growth with equity” strategy that Vietnam chose to follow during the 1990s was partially successful. Although economic growth was pro-poor during the period 1993-1998, the poor still benefited proportionally less than the rich from economic growth. In addition, the benefits gained from overall economic growth differed considerably between different socioeconomic groups of the poor. On the whole, the poor in the urban areas, which are dominated by the Kinh majority and where the industrial and services sectors are concentrated, benefited proportionally much more than the poor in the mountainous and remote areas where ethnic minorities reside, and the rural areas where the agricultural sector dominates.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Pro-poor growth, poverty, inequality, household surveys, Vietnam.
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development

References

ADB (1999), Fighting Poverty in Asia and the Pacific: The Poverty Reduction Strategy, Manila: Asian Development Bank.

ADB (2000), Asian Development Outlook 2000, Asian Development Bank.

Ahluwalia, M., Carter, N. and Chenery, H. (1979), “Growth and Poverty in Developing Countries”. Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 6, 1979 page: 299-341.

Ames, B., Brown, W., Devarajan, S., and Izquierdo, A. (2001), “Macroeconomic Policy and Poverty Reduction”, Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper, Sourcebook Chapter 6, 2001, World Bank.

Arrow, K. J. (1962), “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”, Review of Economic Studies, 29(1962), page: 155-173.

Bhagwati, J. N. (1968), “Distortions and Immiserizing Growth: A Generalization”, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 35, No. 104.

Bhagwati, J. N. (1988), “Poverty and Public Policy”, World Development, 16(5), page: 539-654.

Datt, G. and Ravallion, M. (1991), “Growth and Redistribution Components of Changes in Poverty Measures: A Decomposition with Applications to Brazil and India in the 1980s”, Living Standard Measurement Study, Working Paper No. 83.

Deininger, K. and Squire, L. (1997), “Economic Growth and Income Inequality: Reexamining the Links”, Finance and Development, March.

Demery, L. and Squire, L. (1995), Poverty in Africa: an Emerging Picture, Washington, DC, World Bank.

Dollar, D. and Kraay, A. (2000), Growth Is Good for the Poor, Development Research Group, Washington, D.C., World Bank.

Fallon, P. and Hon, V. (1999), Poverty and Labor-Intensive Growth, Note Prepared for World Development Report 2000/2001, World Bank.

Fields, G. (1980), Poverty, Inequality, Development, New York, Cambridge University Press.

Fields, G. (1989), Changes in Poverty and Inequality in Developing Countries, World Bank Research Observer, Vol. 4.

Foster, J., Greer, J., and Thorbecke, E. (1984), “A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures”, Econometrica Vol.52, 1984, page: 761-765.

General Statistical Office (various years), Statistical Yearbook, Hanoi: Statistical Publishing House.

Glewwe, P., Gragnolati, M., and Zaman, H. (2000), “Who Gained from Vietnam's Boom in the 1990s? An Analysis of Poverty and Inequality Trends”, Poverty and Human Resources, Development Research Group, World Bank.

Kakwani, N. C. (1980), Income Inequality and Poverty: Methods of Estimation and Policy Applications, World Bank Research Publication, Oxford University Press.

Kakwani, N. C., and Pernia, E. M. (2000), “What is Pro-poor Growth”, Asian Development Review, Asian Development Bank.

Perkins, Dwiggt H., Steven Radelet, Donald R. Snodgrass, Malcolm Gillis, and Michael Roemer (2001), Economics of Development, W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

Ravallion, M. (1992), “Poverty Comparisons: A Guide to Concepts and Methods”, Living Standard Measurement Study, Working Paper No. 88, World Bank.

Ravallion, M. (1997), “Can High-Inequality Developing Countries Escape Absolutely Poverty?”, Policy Working Paper No. 1775, World Bank.

Ravallion, M. and Chen, S. (1997), “What Can New Survey Data Tell Us about Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty?”, World Bank Researcher Observer, Vol. 11.

Ravallion, M., and Datt, G. (1999), When Is Growth Pro-poor? Evidence from the Diverse Experiences of India's States, World Bank.

Theil, H. (1967), Economics and Information Theory, Amsterdam, North Holland.

Timmer, C. P. (1997), How Well Do the Poor Connect to the Growth Process?, Consulting Assistance on Economic Reform Discussion Paper 178, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Institute for International Development.

Villasenor, J., and B. C. Arnold (1989), “Elliptical Lorenz Curve”, Journal of Econometrics 40, page: 327-338.

World Bank (1996), Taking Action to Reduce Poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa – An Overview, World Bank, Washington, DC.

World Bank (2000), Vietnam Development Report 2000: Attacking Poverty, Hanoi, Vietnam. Available via internet at: http://worldbank.org.vn

World Bank (2001), World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty, Oxford University Press.