Xu, Lili and Lee, Sang-Ho and Wang, Leonard (2017): Strategic Trade and Privatization Policies in Bilateral Mixed Markets. Published in: Firms' Strategic Decisions: Theoretical and Empirical Findings , Vol. 3, (2018)
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_80340.pdf Download (169kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We consider strategic trade and privatization policies in international bilateral mixed markets where a domestic state-owned enterprise competes with both domestic and foreign private enterprises in each country. We examine the strategic interaction of two countries’ optimal choices of privatization and trade policies with different combinations of production subsidy and import tariff, and find some interesting policy implications. First, a higher social welfare can be achieved with the appropriate degree of privatization when both governments adopt a production subsidy only. Second, FTA can work as a coordination device to solve the prisoner’s dilemma problem. Third, the maximum-revenue privatization, combined with zero subsidy and higher tariff, is higher than optimum-welfare privatization. Finally, the international bilateral equilibrium needs less degree of privatization and lower subsidy rate, even though it is jointly suboptimal from the viewpoint of global welfare.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Strategic Trade and Privatization Policies in Bilateral Mixed Markets |
English Title: | Strategic Trade and Privatization Policies in Bilateral Mixed Markets |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | strategic privatization; international bilateral mixed market; industrial policy; optimal tariff; |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises |
Item ID: | 85738 |
Depositing User: | Professor Sang-Ho Lee |
Date Deposited: | 10 Apr 2018 11:01 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 09:06 |
References: | Bárcena-Ruiz, J. C., & Garzón, M. B. (2005). International trade and strategic privatization. Review of Development Economics, 9(4), 502-513. Bos, D. (1991). Privatization: a theoretical treatment. OPU Catalogue. Brander, J.A., & Spencer, B.J. (1984). Trade warfare: tariffs and cartels. Journal of International Economics, 16(3), 227-242. Brander, J. A., & Spencer, B. J. (1985). Export subsidies and international market share rivalry. Journal of international Economics, 18(1), 83-100. Chang, W.W. (2005). Optimal trade and privatization policies in an international duopoly with cost asymmetry. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 14(1), 19-42. Chang, W.W. (2007). Optimal trade, industrial, and privatization policies in a mixed duopoly with strategic managerial incentives. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 16(1), 31-51. Chao, C.C., & Yu, E.S.H. (2006). Partial privatization, foreign competition, and optimum tariff. Review of International Economics, 14(1), 87-92. Clarke, R., & Collie, D. R. (2006). Optimum-welfare and maximum-revenue tariffs under Bertrand duopoly. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 53(3), 398-408. Collie, D. (1991). Optimum welfare and maximum revenue tariffs under oligopoly. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 38(4), 398-401. Collie, D. (1993). Strategic trade policy under asymmetric oligopoly. European Journal of Political Economy, 9(2), 275-280. Dadpay, A., & Heywood, J. S. (2006). Mixed oligopoly in a single international market. Australian Economic Papers, 45(4), 269-280. De Fraja, G., & Delbono, F. (1989). Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxford Economic Papers, 41(2), 302-311. Eaton, J., & Grossman, G. M. (1986). Optimal trade and industrial policy under oligopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 383-406. Fjell, K., & Pal, D. (1996). A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms. Canadian Journal of Economics, 29(3), 737-743. Fjell, K., & Heywood, J. S. (2002). Public Stackelberg leadership in a mixed oligopoly with foreign firms. Australian Economic Papers, 41(3), 267-281. George, K & M. La Manna (1996). Mixed duopoly, inefficiency, and public ownership. Review of Industrial Organization 11(6), 853-860. Han, L. (2012). Strategic privatization and trade policies in an international mixed oligopoly. Manchester School, 80(5), 580-602. Han, L., & Ogawa, H. (2008). Economic integration and strategic privatization in an international mixed oligopoly. Public Finance Analysis, 64(3), 352-363. Hashimzade, N., Khodavaisi, H., & Myles, G. (2007). An irrelevance result with differentiated goods. Economics Bulletin, 8(2), 1-7. Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94(1), 300-316. Lato, K. and Tomaru, Y. (2007). Mixed oligopoly, privatization, subsidization and the order of firms’ moves: several types of objectives. Economics Letters, 96, 287-292. Kowalski, P., et al, (2013). State-owned enterprises: trade effects and policy implications. OECD Publishing, No. 147. Larue, B., & Gervais, J. P. (2002). Welfare–maximizing and revenue–maximizing tariffs with a few domestic firms. Canadian Journal of Economics, 35(4), 786-804. Lee, S. H. (2006). Welfare-improving privatization policy in the telecommunications industry. Contemporary Economic Policy, 24(2), 237-248. Lee, S.H., & Hwang, H.S. (2003). Partial ownership for the public firm and competition. Japanese Economic Review, 54(3), 324-335. Lee, S.H., Xu, L.L., & Chen, Z. (2013) Competitive privatization and tariff policies in an international mixed duopoly. Manchester School, 81(5), 763-779. Lu, Y. (2006). Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly with foreign competitors: the linear demand case. Journal of Economics, 88(1), 49-68. Lu, Y. (2007). Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly consisting of a single public firm and foreign competitors. Economics Bulletin, 12(2), 1-7. Matsumura, T. (1998). Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics, 70(3), 473-483. Matsumura, T. (2003). Stackelberg mixed duopoly with a foreign competitor. Bulletin of Economic Research, 55(3), 275-287. Matsumura, T., & Ogawa, A. (2010). On the robustness of private leadership in mixed duopoly. Australian Economic Papers, 49(2), 149-160. Matsumura, T., & Okumura, Y. (2013). Privatization neutrality theorem revisited. Economics Letters, 118(2), 324-326. Matsumura, T., & Tomaru, Y. (2012). Market structure and privatization policy under international competition. Japanese Economics Review, 63(2), 244-258. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725. Nellis, J. R. (1999). Time to rethink privatization in transition economies? World Bank Publications, Vol. 38. Pal, D. (1998). Endogenous timing in a mixed oligopoly. Economics Letters, 61(2), 181-185. Pal, D., & White, M.D. (1998). Mixed oligopoly, privatization, and strategic trade policy. Southern Economic Journal, 65(2), 264-281. Pal, D., & White, M.D. (2003). Intra-industry trade and strategic trade police in the presence of public firms. International Economic Journal, 17(4), 29-41. Poyago-Theotoky, J. (2001). Mixed oligopoly, subsidization and the order of firms' moves: an irrelevance result. Economics Bulletin, 12(3), 1-5. Tomaru, Y. (2006). Mixed oligopoly, partial privatization and subsidization. Economics Bulletin, 12(5), 1-6. Van Long, N., & Stähler, F. (2009). Trade policy and mixed enterprises. Canadian Journal of Economics, 42(2), 590-614. Wang, C.C. & Chiou, J. R, (2015). An analysis of policy harmonization on privatization and trade liberalization. International Review of Economics and Finance, 38, 279-290. Wang, L.F.S., Lee, J.Y. & Hsu, C.C. (2014). Privatization, foreign competition and social efficiency of free entry. International Review of Economics and Finance, 31, 138-147. Wang, L.F.S., Lee, J.Y., & Huang, C.S. (2012). Maximum-revenue and optimum-welfare tariffs in international mixed duopoly: does the order of firms’ move matter? Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 12(3), 273-283. Wang, L.F., Wang, J., &. Lee, J.Y. (2010). Optimum-welfare and maximum-revenue tariffs in mixed oligopoly with foreign competitors. Australian Economic Papers, 49(1), 60-72. Wang, L.F.S., Wang, Y.C., & Zhao, L. (2009). Privatization and efficiency gain in an international mixed oligopoly with asymmetric costs. Japanese Economic Review, 60(4), 539-559. White, M. D. (1996). Mixed oligopoly, privatization and subsidization. Economics letters, 53(2), 189-195. Xu, L.L. and Lee, S.H. (2015). Strategic privatization with tariffs and environmental taxes in an international mixed duopoly. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 56(1), 135-154. Xu, L.L., Lee, S.H. and Wang, L.F.S. (2016) Free trade agreements and privatization policy with an excess burden of taxation. Japan and the World Economy, 37-38, 55-64. Yu, R., & Lee, S.H. (2011). Optimal trade and privatization policies in an international mixed market. Seoul Journal of Economics, 24(1), 51-71. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/85738 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Strategic Trade and Privatization Policies in Bilateral Mixed Markets. (deposited 26 Jul 2017 14:57)
- Strategic Trade and Privatization Policies in Bilateral Mixed Markets. (deposited 10 Apr 2018 11:01) [Currently Displayed]