Chichilnisky, Graciela and Chanel, Olivier (2011): Valuing Life: Experimental Evidence Using Sensitivity to Rare Events. Published in: Ecological Economics , Vol. 85, (January 2013): pp. 198-205.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_86116.pdf Download (454kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Global environmental phenomena like climate change, major extinction events or flutype pandemics can have catastrophic consequences. By properly assessing the outcomes involved – especially those concerning human life – economic theory of choice under uncertainty is expected to help people take the best decision. However, the widely used expected utility theory values life in terms of the low probability of death someone would be willing to accept in order to receive extra payment. Common sense and experimental evidence refute this way of valuing life, and here we provide experimental evidence of people's unwillingness to accept a low probability of death, contrary to expected utility predictions. This work uses new axioms of choice defined by Chichilnisky (2000), especially an axiom that allows extreme responses to extreme events, and the choice criterion that they imply. The implied decision criteria are a combination of expected utility with extreme responses, and seem more consistent with observations.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Valuing Life: Experimental Evidence Using Sensitivity to Rare Events |
English Title: | Valuing Life: Experimental Evidence Using Sensitivity to Rare Events |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Decision under risk, Value of prevented fatality, Expected utility, Experiment, Catastrophic risk |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty |
Item ID: | 86116 |
Depositing User: | Graciela Chichilnisky |
Date Deposited: | 31 Aug 2018 23:34 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 21:00 |
References: | Allais, M. 1953. Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’´ecole am´ericaine. Econometrica. 21, 503-546. Arrow, K., 1966. Exposition of the theory of choice under uncertainty. Synthese. 16, 253-269. Arrow, K., 1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing, North Holland, Amsterdam. Beattie, J., Chilton, S., Cookson, R., Covey, J., Hopkins, L., Jones-Lee, M., Loomes, G., Pidgeon, N., Robinson, A., Spencer, A, 1998. Valuing health and safety controls: A literature review, Report, London: HSE Books. Bland, J.M., Butland, B.K. Comparing proportions in overlapping samples. Unpublished paper, http://www-users.york.ac.uk/∼mb55/overlap.pdf, accessed on 10/24/2011, 13p. Buchholz, W., Schymura, M., 2010. Expected utility theory and the tyranny of catastrophic risks. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 10-059, Mannheim. Camerer, C., Hogarth, R., 1999. The effects of financial incentives in experiments: a review and capital-labor-production framework. J. Risk Uncertainty. 19(1), 7-42. Chanel, O., Chichilnisky, G., 2009. The influence of fear in decisions: experimental evidence. J Risk Uncertainty. 39, 271-298. Chichilnisky, G., 1996. Updating Von Neumann Morgenstern Axioms for Choice under Uncertainty, Proceedings of a Conference on Catastrophic Risks, The Fields Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Toronto Canada. Chichilnisky, G., 2000. An axiomatic approach to choice under uncertainty with catastrophic risks. Resource Energy Econom. 22, 221-231. Chichilnisky, G., 2002. Catastrophic risk, in: El-Shaarawi, A., Piegorsch, W. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chicester: UK, 1 pp. 274-279. Chichilnisky, G., 2009. The topology of fear. J Mathem. Econom. 45, 807-816. Debreu, G., 1953. Valuation equilibrium and Pareto optimum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 40, 588-592. Ellsberg, D., 1961. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quart. J. Econom. 75, 643-669. Harrison, G., 1994. Expected utility theory and the experimentalists. Empirical Econom. 19, 223-253. Hernstein, N., Milnor, J., 1953. An axiomatic approach to measurable utility. Econometrica. 21, 291-297. Ikefuji, M., Laeven, R.J.A., Magnus, J.R., Muris, C., 2010. Expected utility and catastrophic risk in a stochastic economy-climate model. Working Paper 2010-122, Tilburg University, ISSN 0924-7815. Johansson, P.-O., 2003. The value of a statistical life: Theoretical and empirical evidence. Applied Health Econom. Health Policy Special Issue, 25-33. Knutson, B., Peterson, R., 2005. Neurally reconstructing expected utility. Games Econom. Behavior. 52, 305-315 LeDoux, J., 1996. The Emotional Brain, Simon and Schuster, New York. Loewenstein, G., 1999. Experimental Economics from the Vantage-Point of behavioural economics. Econom. J. 109, 25-34. Miller, T., 2000. Variations between Countries in Value of Statistical Life. J. Transport Econom. Policy. 34(2), 169-188. Millner A., 2011. On welfare frameworks and catastrophic climate risks. Mimeo University of California, Berkley, 29 p., http://ssrn.com/abstract=1799481, accessed on 10/24/2011. Mrozek, J., Taylor, L., 2002. What Determines the value of a life? A meta-analysis. J. Policy Anal. Management. 21(2), 253-270. Posner, R., 2004. Catastrophe: Risk and response, Oxford University Press, New York. Rosen, S., 1988. The value of changes in life expectancy. J. Risk Uncertainty. 1(3), 285-304. Slovic, P., 1969. Differential effects of real versus hypothetical payoffs on choices among gambles. J. Experimental Psych. 80, 434-437. Smith, K., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K., Pardo, J.V., 2002. Neuronal substrates for choice under ambiguity, risk, gains and losses. Management Sci. 48, 711-718. Smith, V., 1976. Experimental economics induced value theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 66(2), 274-279. Smith, V., Walker, J., 1993. Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics. Econom. Inquiry. 31, 245-261. Sunstein, C., 2003. Terrorism and probability neglect. J. Risk Uncertainty. 26(2/3), 121-136. Sunstein, C., Zeckhauser, R., 2011. Overreaction to fearsome risks. Env. Res. Econ. 48(3), 435-449. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., 1992. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty. 5, 297-323. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Benefits of the Proposed Inter-State Air Quality Rule. Report EPA 452-03-001, January. Villegas, C., 1964. On quantitative probability σ− algebras. Annals Math. Stat. 35, 1789-1800. Viscusi, K., 1993. The value of risks to life and health. J. Econom. Literature. XXXI, 1912-1946. Viscusi, K., Aldy, J., 2003. The value of a statistical life: A critical review of market estimates throughout the world. J. Risk Uncertainty. 27(1), 5-76. Weitzman, M.L., 2009. On modelling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate Change. Rev. Econom. Stat. 91(1), 1-19. Weitzman, M.L., 2011. Fat-tailed uncertainty in the economics of Catastrophic climate change. Rev. Env. Econom. Policy. 5(2), 275-292. World Bank. 1999. World Development Report 1998/99, Oxford University Press. Yosida, K., 1974. Functional Analysis, 4th edition, Springer Verlag, New York Heidelberg. Yosida, K., Hewitt, E., 1952. Finitely level independent measures. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society. 72, 46-66. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/86116 |