Does Trade Policy Explain Total Factor Productivity Differences Across Countries?

Hussien, Abdurohman and Ahmed, Shakeel and Yousaf, Muhammed (2012): Does Trade Policy Explain Total Factor Productivity Differences Across Countries? Published in: Current Research Journal of Economic Theory , Vol. 4, No. 4 (20 September 2012): pp. 95-111.

Abstract

This study examines whether variations in restrictiveness of trade policy on the flow of international trade explain Total Factor Productivity (TFP) differences across countries. The study employs Trade Restrictiveness Indices (TRIs) to measure trade policy. The TRIs are aggregated using data at the tariff line level, which enable the study to overcome the aggregation bias characterizing the commonly used trade policy measures such as average tariff and import-weighted average tariff. TRIs for Non-Tariff Barriers on imports (NTB), import tariffs and export restrictions are used to show the relative restrictiveness of various types of trade policy on TFP. In line with the political economy literature, the trade restrictiveness measure based on NTB is instrumented using past trade shares while identifying the former’s effect on TFP. Using IV regression, the study shows that trade restrictiveness based on NTB explains a significant variation in TFP across countries while trade restrictiveness based on import tariff or export restrictions does not have a significant effect on TFP. Hence, countries should reduce NTBs on their imports to allow a gain in TFP associated with trade. Besides, the findings suggest that countries should substitute the more restrictive and less transparent trade policy, i.e., NTBs with the less restrictive and more transparent trade policy, i.e., Tariffs.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Export restrictions, import Tariffs, NTBs, TFP, trade policy, TRIs
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations

References

Alcala, F. and A. Ciccone, 2004. Trade and productivity. Q. J. Econ., 119(2): 612-645.

Baum, C., M.E. Shaffer and S. Stillman, 2007. Enhanced routines for instrumental variables /GMM estimation and testing. CERT Discussion Papers 0706, Ctr. Econ. Reform Transform. Heriot Watt Univ. Published, Stata J., 7(4): 465-506.

Barro, R.J. and L. Jong-Wha, 2000. International Data on Educational Attainment: Updates and Implications NBER Working Paper, No. 7911. In: Barro, R.J. and L. Jong-Wha (Eds.), Oxford. Economic. Papers. 2001, 53(3, July): 541-563.

Choudri, E.U. and D.S. Hakura, 2000. International Trade and Productivity Growth: Exploring the Sectoral Effects for Developing Countries. IMF Staff Papers, Palgrave Macmillan J., 47(1): 30-53.

Cragg, J.G. and S.G. Donald, 1993. Testing identifiability and specification in Instrumental variable models. Cambridge University. Press, Econometric. Theory. 9 (2, Jun., 1993): 222-240.

Dollar, D. and A. Kraay, 2003. Institutions, trade and growth. J. Monetary. Econ., 50(1): 133-162.

Easterly, W., 2003. Tropics, germs and crops: How endowments influence economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics. 50(1): 3-40.

Feenstra, R.C., 2004. Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Princeton University Press,Princeton, NJ.

Frankel, J.A. and D. Romer, 1999. Does trade cause growth? Am. Econ. Rev., 89(3): 379-399. Gallup, J.L.,

J.D. Sachs and A. Mellinger, 1999. Geography and economic development. Int. Regional Sci. Rev., 22(2): 179-232.

Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman, 1991. Trade, knowledge spillovers and growth. Eur. Econ. Rev., 35(2): 517-526.

Hahn, J., J. Hausman and K. Guido, 2004. Estimation with weak instruments: Accuracy of higher-order bias and MSE approximations. Econometric. Journal. 7(1): 272-306.

Hall, R.E. and C.I. Jones, 1999. Why do some countries produce so much output per worker than others? Q. J. Econ., 114(1): 83-116.

Haveman, J. and J.G. Thursby, 2000. The Impact of Tariffs and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade in Agricultural Commodities. Working Paper, Purdue University.

Holmes, T.J. and J.A. Schmitz, 1995. Resistance to new technology and trade between areas. Reserve Bank Minneapolis Quart. Rev., 19(1): 2-17.

Jonsson, G. and A. Subramanian, 2001. Dynamic gains from trade: Evidence from South Africa. IMF Staff Papers, 48(1): 197-224.

Kaufman, D., A. Kraav and M. Mastruzzi, 2009. Governance Matters VIII: Aggregate and Individual Governance Indicators, 1996-2008.

World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4978. Kee, H.L., M. Olarega and A. Nicita, 2009. Estimating trade restrictiveness indices. Econ. J., 119(534): 172-199.

Klenow, P.J. and A. Rodriguez-Clare, 1997. The Neo Classical Revival in Growth Economics: Has It Gone Too Far? In: Bernanke, B.S. and J.Rotemberg (Eds.), NBER Macro Economics, Annual, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

Lee, J.W. and P. Swagel, 1997. Trade barriers and trade flows across countries and industries. Rev. Econ. Stat., 79(3): 372-382.

Mankiw, N.G., D. Romer and D.N. Weil, 1992. A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Q. J. Econ., 107(2): 407-437.

Melitz, M.J., 2003. The impact of trade on intra industry reallocations and aggregate industry Productivity. Econometrica, 71: 1695-1725.

Miller, S.M. and M.P. Upadhyay, 2000. The effects of openness, trade orientation and human capital on Total factor productivity. J. Dev. Econ., 63(2): 399-423.

Parente, S.L. and E.C. Prescott, 1994. Barriers to technology adoption and development. Journal of Political Economy. 102(2): 298-321.

Rodriguez-Clare, A., 1996. The Role of Trade in Technology Diffusion. Minneapolis, MN: Institute For Empirical Macroeconomics, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1996. Discussion Paper, 114.

Rodrik, D., 1995. Getting intervention right: How South Korea and Taiwan grew rich. Econ. Policy, 20: 53-107.

Staiger, D. and J.H. Stock, 1997. Instrumental variables regressions with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65(3): 557-586.

Stock, J.H. and M. Yogo, 2002. Testing For Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression. NBER Technical Working Paper No. 284 (Cambridge, Massachusetts: National Bureau of Economic Research).

Trefler, D., 1993. Trade liberalization and the theory of endogenous protection: An econometric study of U.S. Import policy. J. Polit. Econ., 101(1): 138-160.

World Development Indicator, 2008. The World Bank.CD-ROM.