Towards Platform Defined Business – Complementarity at the Spotlight

Najda-Janoszka, Marta (2018): Towards Platform Defined Business – Complementarity at the Spotlight. Published in: Entrepreneurship and Management , Vol. XIX, No. 6 (2018): pp. 107-117.

Abstract

As markets become increasingly more competitive firms systematically move away from hierarchical integrated supply chains toward fragmented networks of strategic partnerships with external partners. Business practice indicate a growing number of busi-nesses relying on the platform organizational structures. For such constructs superior pro-duct quality and customer appeal maintain necessary but it is the breadth of the ecosystem of related product and services that has become a prerequisite for success. It implies the focus on third parties, complementors, who develop and deliver diverse content to plat-forms as well as enhance platform’s generativity. Although complementary relations should be the main reference while considering the network dynamics from different angles, the attention in the extant research gravitates toward inter-platform competition with platform owners as the central object. Thus, with the objective to contribute to the emerging lite-rature on industry platforms, this conceptual article discusses main challenges concerned with orchestrating arm’s length relationships with complementors, by departing from plat-form-owner-centered approach and focusing on behavior of interdepended contributors.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: digital platform, value capture, value creation, complements, boundary resources
• Subjects: M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M15 - IT Management; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

References

Baldwin C.Y., Woodard C.J. (2009), The architecture of platforms: A unified view [in:] A. Gawer (ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp. 19–44.

Boudreau K.J. (2010), Open platform strategies and innovation: granting access vs. devolving con-trol, “Management Science”, 56(10), pp. 1849–1872.

Casadesus-Masanell R., Halaburda H. (2014), When does platform create value by limiting choice?, “Journal of Economics & Management Strategy”, 23(2), pp. 259–293.

Cennamo C., Santalo J. (2013), Platform competition: Strategic trade-offs in platform markets,“Strategic Management Journal”, 34, pp. 1331–1350, DOI: 10.1002/smj2066.

Chesbrough H.W. (2003), The logic of open innovation: managing intellectual property, “California Management Review”, 45(3), pp. 33–58.

Czakon W. (2012), Sieci w zarządzaniu strategicznym, Wolters Kluwer Polska, Warszawa.

Dahlander L., Gann D. (2010), How Open is Innovation? “Research Policy”, 39(6), pp. 699–709.

Eisenmann T., Parker G, Van Alstyne M. (2011), Platform envelopment, “Strategic Management Journal”, 32(12), pp. 1270–1285.

Ford D, Håkansson H., Snehota I., Gadde L.E. (2011), Managing Business Relationships, Wiley & Sons, New York.

Gawer A. (2014), Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework, “Research Policy”, 43(7), pp. 1239–1249.

Gawer A. (2009), Platform Dynamics and Strategies: from Products to Service [in:] A. Gawer (ed.), Platforms, Markets and Innovation, Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, UK, pp. 45–76.

Ghazawneh A., Hendfridsson O. (2013), Balancing platform control and external contribution in third-party development: the boundary resources model, “Information Systems Journal”, 23, pp. 173–192.

Håkansson H., Snehota I. (1995), Developing Relationships in Business Networks, Routledge, London.

Hendfridsson O., Bygstad B. (2013), The Generative mechanisms of digital infrastructure evolution, “MIS Quarterly”, 37(3), pp. 907–931.

Henkel J., Baldwin C., Shih W. (2013), IP Modularity: Profiting from Innovation by Aligning Product Architecture with Intellectual Property, “California Management Review”, 55(4), pp. 65–82.

Hidding G.J., Williams J., Sviokla, J.J. (2011), How platform leaders win, “Journal of Business Strategy”, 32(2), pp. 29–37.

Jacobides M.G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. (2015), Industries, Ecosystems, Platforms, and Architectu-res: Rethinking our Strategy Constructs at the Aggregate Level, working paper.

Kapoor R., Agarwal S. (2017), Sustaining superior performance in business ecosystems: Evidence from application software developers in the iOS and Android smartphone ecosystems, “Organiza-tion Science”, 28(3), pp. 531–551.

Karhu K., Gustafsson R. (2015), Open platform boundary resources as arenas for strategic explo-itation, “Academy of Management Proceedings”, January, 16670.

Katz M. L., Shapiro C. (1994), Systems Competition and Network Effects, “Journal of Economic Perspectives”, 8, pp. 93–115.

Kenney M., Zysman J. ( 2016), The Rise of the Platform Economy, “Issues in Science and Techno-logy”, (Spring), pp. 61–69.

Lavie D. (2007), Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and ap-propriation in the US software industry, “Strategic Management Journal”, 28(12), pp. 1187–1212.

McIntyre D.P., Srinivasan A. (2017), Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps, “Strategic Management Journal”, 38, pp. 141–160.

Najda-Janoszka M. (2016), Dynamic capability-based approach to value appropriation, Jagiello-nian University Press, Krakow.

Niemczyk J., Stańczyk-Hugiet E., Jasiński B. (2012), Sieci międzyorganizacyjne. Współczesne wyzwanie dla teorii i praktyki zarządzania, Warszawa, C.H. Beck.

Parker G., Van Alstyne M., Jiang X. (2017), Platform ecosystems: How developers invert the firm, “Management Information Systems Quarterly”, 41(1), pp. 255–266.

Piezunka H. (2011), Technological platforms – An assessment of the primary types of technolog-ical platforms, their strategic issues and their linkages to organizational theory, “Journal für Be-triebswirtschaft”, 61(2–3), pp. 179–226.

de Reuver M., Sørensen C., Basole R.C. (2017), The digital platform: a research agenda, “Journal of Information Technology”, pp. 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41265-016-0033-3.

Rochet J.C., Tirole J. (2006), Two-sided markets: A progress report, “The RAND Journal of Eco-nomics”, 37(3), pp. 645–667.

Schreieck M., Wiesche M., Krcmar H. (2017), The Platform owner’s challenge to capture value – insights from a business-to-business IT platform, research paper presented at Thirty Eight Inter-national Conference on Information Systems, South Korea 2017.

Svahn F., Mathiassen L., Lindgren R. (2017), Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns, “MIS Quarterly”, 41(1), pp. 239–253, DOI:10.25300/ MISQ/2017/41.1.12.

Teece D.J. (2001), Managing intellectual capital, Oxford University Press.

Tiwana A. (2015), Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems, “Information Systems Re-search”, 26(2), pp. 266–281.

Tiwana A., Konsynski B., Bush A. (2010), Research Commentary – Platform evolution: Coevo-lution of platform architecture, governance and environmental dynamics, “Information Systems Research”, 21(4), pp. 675–687.

Venkatraman N.V., El Sawy O.A., Pavlou P.A., Bharadwaj A. (2014), Theorizing Digital Business Innovation: Platforms and Capabilities in Ecosystems, Fox School of Business Research Paper No. 15-080.

Wareham J., Fox P.B., Cano Giner J.L. (2014), Technology ecosystem governance, “Organization Science”, 25(4), pp. 1195–1415.