Direct and Relative Effects of the Import Tariff: Estimation Using the Chinese Industrial Level Data

Miao, Zhuang and Wu, Xiaokang and Yu, Jinping (2018): Direct and Relative Effects of the Import Tariff: Estimation Using the Chinese Industrial Level Data.

Abstract

The importing country usually imposes heterogeneous import tariff rates based on the national origins of the products. Reducing the tariff rates on the products from one origin country not only increases the imports from this country, but also decreases the imports from the other trade partners of the importing country. (Direct and relative effects of the import tariff) This paper constructs a variation of the conventional gravity model to analyze the direct and relative effects of the import tariff on international trade flows at the industrial level. Based on our theoretical framework, we compute a new indicator to measure the relative effect and estimate both effects using the Chinese industrial level data. Our empirical findings are consistent with our theoretical predictions: (i) if the tariff rates are reduced towards one origin country, the importing country will import more from this country but reduce the imports from the other origins; (ii) the relative effect is more effective at the industry or country where the importing penetration ratio is relatively high; and (iii) omission of the import penetration ratio will lead to the underestimation of the effects of the multilateral resistance terms on trade performances. Our research contributes to the existing literature by introducing a manipulable method to compute the direct and relative effects of the trade cost at the industrial level, which takes the heterogeneity among industries and countries into account

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: International trade, Gravity equation, Industrial heterogeneity, China
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration

References

Anderson, James E., Mykyta Vesselovsky, and Yoto V. Yotov. "Gravity with scale effects." Journal of International Economics 100 (2016): 174-193.

Baier, Scott L., and Jeffrey H. Bergstrand. "Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?." Journal of international Economics 71, no. 1 (2007): 72-95.

Baier, Scott L., and Jeffrey H. Bergstrand. "Bonus vetus OLS: A simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects using the gravity equation." Journal of International Economics 77, no. 1 (2009): 77-85.

Baier, Scott L., Jeffrey H. Bergstrand, and Michael Feng. "Economic integration agreements and the margins of international trade." Journal of International Economics 93, no. 2 (2014): 339-350.

Correia, S. "Reghdfe: Stata module for linear and instrumental-variable/gmm regression absorbing multiple levels of fixed effects." (2015).

Correia, Sergio. "Linear models with high-dimensional fixed effects: An efficient and feasible estimator." Unpublished, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (2016).

Carrère, Céline, Jaime De Melo, and Bolormaa Tumurchudur. "Disentangling market access effects of preferential trading arrangements with an application for ASEAN members under an ASEAN–EU FTA." World Economy 33, no. 1 (2010): 42-59.

Estevadeordal, Antoni, Caroline Freund, and Emanuel Ornelas. "Does regionalism affect trade liberalization toward nonmembers?." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123, no. 4 (2008): 1531-1575.

Egger, Peter, and Douglas Nelson. "How bad is antidumping? Evidence from panel data." Review of Economics and Statistics 93, no. 4 (2011): 1374-1390.

Francois, Joseph, Bernard Hoekman, and Miriam Manchin. "Preference erosion and multilateral trade liberalization." The World Bank Economic Review 20, no. 2 (2006): 197-216.

Fugazza, Marco, and Alain McLaren. "Market Access, Export Performance and Survival: Evidence from P eruvian Firms." Review of International Economics 22, no. 3 (2014): 599-624.

Fugazza, Marco, and Alessandro Nicita. "The direct and relative effects of preferential market access." Journal of International Economics 89, no. 2 (2013): 357-368.

Helpman, Elhanan, Marc Melitz, and Yona Rubinstein. "Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes." The Quarterly Journal of Economics 123, no. 2 (2008): 441-487.

Haveman, Jon D., Usha Nair-Reichert, and Jerry G. Thursby. "How effective are trade barriers? An empirical analysis of trade reduction, diversion, and compression." Review of Economics and Statistics 85, no. 2 (2003): 480-485.

Hanson, Gordon H., and Chong Xiang. "The home-market effect and bilateral trade patterns." American Economic Review 94, no. 4 (2004): 1108-1129.

Jacob, Viner. "The customs union issue." Carnegue Endowment for Internationl Peace (1950).

Kee, Hiau Looi, Alessandro Nicita, and Marcelo Olarreaga. "Import demand elasticities and trade distortions." The Review of Economics and Statistics 90, no. 4 (2008): 666-682.

Kee, Hiau Looi, Alessandro Nicita, and Marcelo Olarreaga. "Estimating trade restrictiveness indices." Economic Journal 119 (2009): 172-119.

Limão, Nuno. "Preferential trade agreements." In Handbook of commercial policy, vol. 1, pp. 279-367. North-Holland, 2016.

Magee, Christopher SP. "New measures of trade creation and trade diversion." Journal of International Economics 75, no. 2 (2008): 349-362.

Silva, JMC Santos, and Silvana Tenreyro. "The log of gravity." The Review of Economics and statistics 88, no. 4 (2006): 641-658.

Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press, 2010.

Yotov, Yoto V. "A simple solution to the distance puzzle in international trade." Economics Letters 117, no. 3 (2012): 794-798.