Unconditional Basic Income: Who gets it? Who pays for it? A social Accounting Approach to Distribution.

Reich, Utz Peter and Santos, Susana (2018): Unconditional Basic Income: Who gets it? Who pays for it? A social Accounting Approach to Distribution.

Abstract

Unconditional basic income is not a new topic in political economy, and it gains new momentum as more and more research is being devoted to it. The discussion focusses on the adequacy and effects such a policy measure may entail for a person and his socio-economic situation, usually. Object of investigation is the individual, and the corresponding theory is of micro-economic descent. In this paper, in contrast, we develop a method of how to assess feasibility and consequences of an unconditional basic income for a modern, open economy, on the macroeconomic level, using concepts and statistics of a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) as our main tool. A SAM-based approach can measure, and perhaps model, the impact on the economic activity of a country, and on its economic institutions of new policy measures such as introducing an unconditional basic income. The economic activity of a country is expressed in monetary flows as registered in the National Accounts. So their underlying principles and definitions are adopted. However, the habitual way of putting an economy into a sequence of institutional accounts connecting each institution’s income to the cost, - similar to business accounting - reveals only one, namely the inner-institutional half of the economic circuit. The other, outer half, namely, how the costs of one institution generate income for another one is better captured by the format of a Social Accounting Matrix. In the paper, the impact of an unconditional basic income is quantified, for macroeconomic aggregates of institutional sectors and socio-economic groups of households, taking the German and the Portuguese economies as examples. Purpose of the paper is not to argue for, or against, an unconditional basic income, but to offer a scientific tool with which to calculate and assess possibilities and consequences of the proposal, for a national economy as a whole.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Social Accounting Matrix; Unconditional Basic Income; Income Distribution.
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E01 - Measurement and Data on National Income and Product Accounts and Wealth ; Environmental Accounts; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E02 - Institutions and the Macroeconomy; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E16 - Social Accounting Matrix; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E64 - Incomes Policy ; Price Policy

References

Atkinson, A. B. (1980) On the Measurement of Inequality, in: A. B. Atkinson (ed.), Wealth, income and inequality, Oxford: UP, 23-43.

Bartmann, H. (1981) Verteilungstheorie. München, Vahlen. Bolz, N. (2009) Diskurs über die Ungleichheit, ein Anti-Rousseau. München, Wilhelm-Fink Verlag.

European Union, Regulation (EU) No. 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the European Council of 21 May 2013, on the European System of National and Regional Accounts in the European Union – ESA 2010. Official Journal of the European Union; L174; Volume 56. 732p.

Goetz, W. and A.Goehler, (2010) 1000€ für Jeden. Freiheit, Gleichheit, Grundeinkommen. Berlin, Econ.

Groß, M. (2008) Klassen, Schichten, Mobilität. Wiesbaden, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

Handelsblatt vom 7. Februar 2018, Nr.27 p. 25.

Hüther, M. (1991) Aufkommens- und Verteilungswirkungen von Grundeinkommensvorschlägen. Gießen, Fachbereich Wirtschaftswissenschaften.

Inter-Secretariat Working Group on National Accounts (United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and World Bank) – ISWGNA (2009). System of National Accounts 2008. Series F, No. 2, Rev. 5, New York; United Nations.

Joseph, K. and J. Sumption (1979) Equality. London, John Murray.

Lepsius, M. R. (2015) Soziale Schichtung in der industriellen Gesellschaft. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck.

Neuendorff, H. et al. (2009) Arbeit und Freiheit im Widerspruch? Hamburg:VSA.

Opielka, M. (2008) Grundeinkommen als umfassende Sozialreform. In: Th. Straubhaar (ed.) Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen und Solidarisches Bürgergeld – mehr als sozialutopische Konzepte. Hamburg, University Press, 129-176.

Piketty, Th. (2014) Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard UP.

Pyatt, G. (1991) SAMs, the SNA and National Accounting Capabilities. Review of Income and Wealth, 37, 177-198.

Pyatt, G. (1991a) Fundamentals of Social Accounting. Economic Systems Research, 3, 315-341.

Pyatt, G. (1988) A SAM Approach to Modeling. Journal of Policy Modeling, 10, 327-352.

Pyatt, G. and Round, J. (1985) Accounting and Fixed Price Multipliers in a Social Accounting Matrix Framework. In: G. Pyatt, and J. Round, (eds) Social Accounting Matrices. A Basis for Planning. A World Bank Symposium, World Bank, 186-206.

Santos, S. (2018) A matrix approach to the socioeconomic activity of a country. Theoretical Economics Letters, 8, 1083-1135.

Stone, R. (1986) Nobel Memorial Lecture 1984. The Accounts of Society. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 5-28. Stone, R. (1981) Aspects of Economic and Social Modelling. Editions Droz, Genève.

Stone, R. (1973) A System of Social Matrices. Review of Income and Wealth, 19, 143-166.

Straubhaar, Th. (2018) Bedingungsloses Grundeinkommen und Solidarisches Bürgergeld, Hamburg UP.

Vanderborght, Y. and Ph.Van Parijs (2005) Ein Grundeinkommen für alle? Geschichte und Zukunft eines radikalen Vorschlags. Frankfurt/New York, Campus Verlag.

Vanfossen, B. F. (1979) The structure of social inequality. Boston, Toronto: Little, Brown.