Dhingra, Swati (2006): Re-examination of the Mayer Median Voter Model of Trade Policy.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_892.pdf Download (424kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper examines the empirical validity of the Mayer-Heckscher-Ohlin (M-H-O) model. We test the inequality-tariff relationship studied by Dutt & Mitra (2002) as well as a large country version of Mayer’s model. Dutt and Mitra (2002) found support for the inequality-tariff implication of the model for a cross-section of countries in the 1980s, using physical capital and labor as the two factors in the MH- O model. Our results suggest that this finding is not robust. Instead, we find that when human capital and (unskilled) labor are taken as relevant factors, the Mayer implication is validated in the 1980s. Using cross-sectional country data, we also find that the Mayer implication holds for the 1990s with either physical capital or human capital. We discuss possible explanations for the different findings in the two periods. We extend the model to a large country and obtain tariff levels which are a function of the median voter component and a terms of trade factor. For the 1990s, the positive impact of terms of trade considerations on tariff levels across countries is validated. Using human capital, we find that the median voter component has a negative impact on tariffs in labor-abundant countries and a positive impact in capital-abundant countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Institution: | University of Wisconsin-Madison |
Original Title: | Re-examination of the Mayer Median Voter Model of Trade Policy |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | median voter; Mayer; large country; terms of trade |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F59 - Other F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations |
Item ID: | 892 |
Depositing User: | Swati Dhingra |
Date Deposited: | 23 Nov 2006 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 22:13 |
References: | Alesina, A.F., and Rodrik, D., 1994. Distributive Politics and Economic Growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 109(2), pp. 465-490, May. Anderson, J.E. and Neary, J.P., 2003. The mercantilist index of trade policy, International Economic Review, vol. 44(2), pp. 627-649, May. Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R.W., 1999. An economic theory of GATT, American Economic Review, vol. 89(1), pp. 215-48, March. Bagwell, K. and Staiger, R.W., 2006. What Do Trade Negotiators Negotiate About? Empirical Evidence from the World Trade Organization, Working Paper, November. Baier, Scott L., Dwyer, Jr., Gerald P. and Tamura, Robert, 2006. How important are capital and total factor productivity for economic growth?, Economic Inquiry, vol. 44(1), pp. 23-49. Balassa, Bela, 1979. The changing pattern of comparative advantage in manufactured goods, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 61(2), pp. 259-66, May. Balistreri, E., 1997. The performance of the Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek model in predicting endogenous policy forces at the individual level, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 30 (1), pp. 117. Barro, R.J., 1997. Determinants of Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study, MIT Press, Cambridge MA. Beaulieu, E. and Magee, C., 2004. Four simple tests of campaign contributions and trade policy preferences, Economics and Politics, vol. 16 (2), pp. 163-87, July. Becker, Gary S., 1975. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education, second edition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1980. Branson, W.H. and Monoyios, N., 1977. Factor inputs in U.S. trade, Journal of International Economics, vol. 7, pp. 111-31. Broda, Christian, Limao, Nuno and Weinstein, David, 2006. Optimal tariffs: The evidence, NBER Working Paper Series, no. w12033, Cambridge, Mass., National Bureau of Economic Research, 2006. Castello, A. and Domenech R., 2002. Human capital inequality and economic growth: Some new evidence, Economic Journal, vol. 112(478), pp. C187-C200, March. Cohen, Daniel and Soto, Marcelo, 2001. Growth and human capital: Good data, good results, OECD Development Centre Working Papers 179, OECD Development Centre. Dutt, Pushan and Mitra, Devashish, 2002. Endogenous trade policy through majority voting: An empirical investigation, Journal of International Economics, vol. 58(1), pp. 107-134. de la Fuente, Angel and Doménech, Rafael, 2002. Human capital in growth regressions: How much difference does data quality make? An update and further results, CEPR Discussion Papers 3587, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. Feenstra, Robert, 2004. Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press Gawande, Kishore and Bandyopadhyay, Usree, 2000. Is protection for sale? A test of the Grossman-Helpman theory of endogenous protection, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 89, pp.139-152. Gawande, Kishore and Krishna, Pravin, 2005. The political economy of trade policy: Empirical approaches, International Trade 0503003, Economics Working Paper Archive EconWPA. Gawande, Kishore and Li, Hui, 2005. Trade barriers as bargaining outcomes, International Trade 0505002, Economics Working Paper Archive EconWPA. Goldberg, Penelopi and Maggi, Giovanni, 1999. Protection for sale: An empirical investigation, American Economic Review, vol. 89, pp. 1135-1155. Greenaway, D., Morgan, W. and Wright, P., 1997. Trade liberalization and growth in developing countries: some new evidence, World Development, vol. 25, pp. 1885-92. Grossman, G.M., and Helpman, E., 1995. Trade wars and trade talks, Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 103(4), pp. 675-708, August. Hornstein, A., Krusell, P., Violante, G.L., 2005. The effects of technical change on labor market inequalities, in Handbook of Economic Growth 1B, pp. 1275-370, Elsevier Press, Amsterdam. Kee, Hiau Looi, Nicita, Alessandro and Olarreaga, Marcelo, 2006. Estimating Trade Restrictiveness Indices, Policy Research Working Paper Series 3840, The World Bank, Washington D.C. Kee, Hiau Looi, Alessandro Nicita and Marcelo Olarreaga, 2004. Estimating import demand elasticities, mimeo, The World Bank. Li, H., Squire, L. and Zou, H., 1998. Explaining international and intertemporal variations in income inequality, The Economic Journal, vol. 108 (446), pp. 2643. Mayda, Anna Maria and Rodrik, Dani, 2005. Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?, European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pp. 1393-1430, August. Mayer, Wolfgang, 1984. Endogenous tariff formation, American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(5), pp. 970-85. O’Rourke, K. H. and Sinnott, R., 2001. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence, Trinity College Dublin Economic Papers 200110, Trinity College Dublin Economics Department. Olarreaga, M., Soloaga, I., Winters, L.A., 1999. What’s Behind Mercosur’s Common External Tariff?, CEPR Discussion Paper, no. 2310 (forthcoming in Journal of Development Economics). Rodrik, D., 1986. Tariffs, Subsidies, andWelfare with Endogenous Policy, Journal of International Economics, vol. 21(3/4), pp. 285-299. Scheve, K. and Slaughter, M., 2001. What Determines Individual Trade Policy Preferences?, Journal of International Economics, vol. 54(2), pp. 267-92. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/892 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Re-examination of the Mayer Median Voter Model of Trade Policy. (deposited 23 Nov 2006) [Currently Displayed]