Durnin, Brian (2017): James M. Buchanan: Neoclassical, Austrian, Neither, or Both?
PDF
MPRA_paper_89629.pdf Download (830kB) |
Abstract
James McGill Buchanan (1919-2013) received the Nobel Memorial Prize in 1986 for his work in public choice theory, set out in his The Calculus of Consent (1962), co-authored with Gordon Tullock. The Virginia School of Political Economy can be seen as a product of the work of Buchanan and Tullock, along with Ronald Coase, who published his ground-breaking paper on “The Problem of Social Cost” in 1960 while he was at the University of Virginia. This school of thought is generally thought to be in some ill-defined sense allied to the Austrian school of economics, mainly perhaps because of a shared pro-market policy stance. On the other hand, links between Buchanan and neoclassical economists such as Friedman and Stigler are frequently drawn, again probably with the pro-market policy recommendations of each in mind. It is notable that Buchanan, Hayek, and Friedman were all at various times presidents of the Mont Pelerin Society. Yet the differences between neoclassical and Austrian perspectives are profound. It has often been said that the one can be characterized as “equilibrium always” and the other as “equilibrium never”. The case of Buchanan and the Virginia School is therefore extremely interesting for the historian of economic thought. Significant questions are raised about the scope for reconciliation between schools of thought at the most profound levels of methodology and social philosophy.
I posit that, allowing for a slight amount of breathing room, James Buchanan’s economic writings are more Austrian than anything else. From his earliest writings to his last publications, Buchanan clearly had an Austrian-leaning approach. Additionally, many of the criticisms he laid out about the economics profession were directed toward the more neoclassical minded among his peers. While the act of criticizing neoclassical economists does not indicate that Buchanan was an Austrian, it does seem to lay to rest any conclusions that he was a neoclassical economist himself.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | James M. Buchanan: Neoclassical, Austrian, Neither, or Both? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | James M. Buchanan; Virginia School of Political Economy; Austrian school of economics; neoclassical economics; public choice; history of economic thought; |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B30 - General B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B53 - Austrian P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy |
Item ID: | 89629 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Brian Durnin |
Date Deposited: | 27 Oct 2018 07:36 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 09:02 |
References: | Baird, C. W., 1989. "James Buchanan and the Austrians: The Common Ground." Cato Journal, vol 9, no 1, pp. 201-230. Boettke, P. J., 1987. "Virginia Political Economy: A View from Vienna." Market Process, vol 5, no 2, pp. 7-15. Boettke, P. J., 1998. "James M. Buchanan and the Rebirth of Political Economy." In: R. P. Holt & S. Pressman, eds. Economics and its Discontents: Twentieth Century Dissenting Economists. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 21-39. Boettke, P. J., 2008. “Austrian School of Economics.” The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics [Online] Available at: http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/AustrianSchoolofEconomics.html [Accessed 16 August 2017]. Buchanan, J. M., 1964. "What Should Economists Do?" Southern Economic Journal, vol 30, no 3, pp. 213-222. Buchanan, J. M., 1969. Cost and Choice: An Inquiry in Economic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Buchanan, J. M., 1978. "From Private Preferences to Public Philosophy: The Development of Public Choice." In: The Economics of Politics. London: The Institute of Economic Affairs, pp. 1-20. Buchanan, J. M., 1979. What Should Economists Do?. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, Inc.. Buchanan, J. M., 1984. "Politics without Romance: A Sketch of Positive Public Choice Theory and Its Normative Implications." In: J. M. Buchanan & R. D. Tollison, eds. The Theory of Public Choice II. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 11-22. Buchanan, J. M., 2007. Economics From the Outside In. College Station: Texas A&M University Press. Buchanan, J. M., 2012. "Genesis." Public Choice, vol 152, no 3/4, pp. 253-255. Christainsen, G. B., 1988. "James Buchanan and the Revival of Classical Political Economy." Challenge, vol 31, no 2, pp. 11-15. Chwe, M., 2017. “The beliefs of economist James Buchanan conflict with basic democratic norms. Here's Why.” The Washington Post [Online] Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/07/25/the-beliefs-ofeconomist-james-buchanan-conflict-with-basic-democratic-norms-hereswhy/?utm_term=.a553c513823a [Accessed 29 July 2017]. de Soto, J. H., 1998. "The Ongoing Methodenstreit of The Austrian School." Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, vol 8, no 1, pp. 75-113. de Soto, J. H., 2010. Socialism, Economic Calculation and Entrepreneurship. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. DiLorenzo, T. J., 1988. "Competition and Political Entrepreneurship: Austrian Insights into Public Choice Theory." Review of Austrian Economics, vol 2, no 1, pp. 59-71. DiLorenzo, T. J., 1990. "The Subjectivist Roots of James Buchanan's Economics." The Review of Austrian Economics, vol 4, no 1, pp. 180-195. Formaini, R. L., 2003. "James M. Buchanan - The Creation of Public Choice Theory." Economic Insights, vol 8, no 2. Formaini, R. L., 2004. "Knut Wicksell" - The Birth of Modern Monetary Policy. Economic Insights, vol 9, no 1. Hartley, K., 2000. "Jack Wiseman, 1919-1991." The Economic Journal, vol 110, no 464, pp. F445-F454. Henderson, D. R., 2007. “Frank Hyneman Knight (1885-1972).” The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics [Online] Available at: http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/bios/Knight.html [Accessed 13 September 2017]. Kirzner, I. M., 1965. "What Economists Do." Southern Economic Journal, vol 31, no 3, pp. 257-261. Kirzner, I. M., 2008. “Austrian economics.” The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Second Edition, Edited by Steven N. Durlauf and Lawrence E. Blume. Klein, P. G., 2016. Frank Knight and the Austrians. [Online] Available at: https://mises.org/blog/frank-knight-and-austrians [Accessed 13 September 2017]. Northwood University, 2010. Austrian Economics versus the Mainstream: An Interview with Richard M. Ebeling. [Online] Available at: http://defenseofcapitalism.blogspot.com/2010/11/austrian-economics-versusmainstream.html [Accessed 13 September 2017]. Rizzo, M. J., 2014. "James M. Buchanan: Through an Austrian window." Review of Austrian Economics, vol 27, no 2, pp. 135-145. Robbins, L., 1932. In: An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan and Co., Limited, p. 15. Steelman, A., 2004. Full Interview with James Buchanan. [Online] Available at: https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/region_focus/2004/spring/full_interview [Accessed 31 May 2017]. Thornton, M. & Thommesen, S., 1987. "An Interview with Nobel Laureate James Buchanan." Austrian Economics Newsletter, Fall, pp. 3-4. Vanberg, G., 2017. “Was Nobel Laureate James Buchanan really opposed to democracy? Not at all.” The Washington Post [Online] Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2017/08/04/jamesbuchanan-was-committed-to-basic-democratic-values/?utm_term=.5f683d6d043b [Accessed 10 August 2017]. Vandivier, J., 2016. James Buchanan and the Synthesis of Austrian and Neoclassical Economics. [Online] Available at: http://www.afterecon.com/economics-and-finance/james-buchanan-and-thesynthesis-of-austrian-and-neoclassical-economics/ [Accessed 5 June 2017]. Voltaire, 1843. A Philosophical Dictionary. London: W. Dugdale. Weintraub, E. R., 2002. “Neoclassical Economics.” The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics [Online] Available at: http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc1/NeoclassicalEconomics.html [Accessed 16 August 2017]. Yeager, L. B., 2014. "Reminiscences of James Buchanan and the Virginia School." Review of Austrian Economics, vol 27, no 2, pp. 165-173. Yu, F.-L. T., 2011. New Perspectives on Economic Development: A Human Agency Approach. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/89629 |