Li, Yifan and Miao, Zhuang (2018): Trade costs, import penetration, and markups.
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF
MPRA_paper_91757.pdf Download (929kB) |
Abstract
The rise of market power in recent decades has received increased attention, but the determinants of such a rise remain unclear. This paper studies whether and how increasing import penetration of inputs leads to a more concentrated market structure and the associated rise of markups. The use of quadratic preferences in combination with the inclusion of the firm’s choice to import create a link between the use of imported inputs and markups. A reduction in importing costs induces non-importers to start importing intermediates. Yet, the effect on profits is shaped by a trade-off between the potential marginal cost advantage and the fixed cost incurred from importing. As a result, only the most productive firms benefit from globalization, while existing importing firms do not fully pass through the reduction in trade costs using prices. The selection of importers, cost-savings from imported inputs and industry firm turnover jointly explain the rise of average markups in the market. Guided by this theoretical framework, we combine firm-level panel data, sector-level trade data and input-output tables to present empirical evidence on the relationship between the increase in imported input penetration and the rise of market power in the US over the last four decades. Using six-digit sectors as the unit of observation, we show that imported input penetration is positively associated with the size of markups.We test the model predictions on both the import decisions of heterogeneous firms and its implications for market structure. A difference-in-difference exercise that exploits China’s accession to the WTO and the use of input tariffs as a proxy for imported input penetration provide additional supporting evidence. Overall, we find that average industry markups would have been around 1.4% lower each year in the absence of imported inputs.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Trade costs, import penetration, and markups |
English Title: | Trade costs, import penetration, and markups |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | trade cost, import penetration, imperfect market competition, market power, markups |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L13 - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets |
Item ID: | 91757 |
Depositing User: | Mr Zhuang Miao |
Date Deposited: | 28 Jan 2019 10:44 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 18:46 |
References: | Acemoglu, D., D. Autor, D. Dorn, G. H. Hanson, and B. Price (2016). Import competition and the great us employment sag of the 2000s. Journal of Labor Economics 34 (S1), S141–S198. Amiti, M., O. Itskhoki, and J. Konings (2014). Importers, exporters, and exchange rate disconnect. American Economic Review 104 (7), 1942–78. Antras, P., T. C. Fort, and F. Tintelnot (2017). The margins of global sourcing: theory and evidence from us firms. American Economic Review 107 (9), 2514–64. Arkolakis, C., A. Costinot, D. Donaldson, and A. RodrÃguez-Clare (2018). The elusive pro-competitive effects of trade. The Review of Economic Studies, forthcoming. Autor, D., D. Dorn, L. F. Katz, C. Patterson, J. Van Reenen, et al. (2017). The fall of the labor share and the rise of superstar firms. National Bureau of Economic Research. Bas, M. and V. Strauss-Kahn (2015). Input-trade liberalization, export prices and quality upgrading. Journal of International Economics 95 (2), 250 – 262. Bernard, A. B., J. B. Jensen, and P. K. Schott (2006). Trade costs, firms and productivity. Journal of Monetary Economics 53 (5), 917 – 937. Blaum, J., C. Lelarge, and M. Peters (2016). The Gains from Input Trade with Heterogeneous Importers. Working papers 612, Banque de France. Burstein, A. and G. Gopinath (2014). International Prices and Exchange Rates, Volume 4, pp. 391–451. Elsevier. Preliminary January 2013. Prepared for the Handbook of International Economics, Volume 4. Chen, N., J. Imbs, and A. Scott (2009). The dynamics of trade and competition. Journal of International Economics 77 (1), 50 – 62. De Loecker, J. and J. Eeckhout (2017). The rise of market power and the macroeconomic implications. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research. 27 De Loecker, J., P. K. Goldberg, A. K. Khandelwal, and N. Pavcnik (2016). Prices, markups, and trade reform. Econometrica 84 (2), 445–510. Edmond, C., V. Midrigan, and D. Y. Xu (2015, October). Competition, markups, and the gains from international trade. American Economic Review 105 (10), 3183–3221. Elsby, M. W., B. Hobijn, and A. Sahin (2013). The decline of the us labor share. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2013 (2), 1–63. Epifani, P. and G. Gancia (2011). Trade, markup heterogeneity and misallocations. Journal of International Economics 83 (1), 1 – 13. Fan, H., X. Gao, Y. A. Li, and T. A. Luong (2018). Trade liberalization and markups: Micro evidence from china. Journal of Comparative Economics 46 (1), 103 – 130. Fan, H., Y. A. Li, and S. R. Yeaple (2015). Trade liberalization, quality, and export prices. The Review of Economics and Statistics 97 (5), 1033–1051. Feng, L., Z. Li, and D. L. Swenson (2016). The connection between imported intermediate inputs and exports: Evidence from chinese firms. Journal of International Economics 101, 86 – 101. Gopinath, G. and B. Neiman (2014, March). Trade adjustment and productivity in large crises. American Economic Review 104 (3), 793–831. Halpern, L., M. Koren, and A. Szeidl (2015). Imported inputs and productivity. American Economic Review 105 (12), 3660–3703. Holmes, T. J., W.-T. Hsu, and S. Lee (2014). Allocative efficiency, mark-ups, and the welfare gains from trade. Journal of International Economics 94 (2), 195 – 206. Konings, J., P. V. Cayseele, and F. Warzynski (2001). The dynamics of industrial mark-ups in two small open economies: does national competition policy matter? International Journal of Industrial Organization 19 (5), 841 – 859. Competition Policy in Dynamic Markets. 28 Ludema, R. D. and Z. Yu (2016). Tariff pass-through, firm heterogeneity and product quality. Journal of International Economics 103, 234 – 249. Melitz, M. J. and G. I. Ottaviano (2008). Market size, trade, and productivity. The Review of Economic Studies 75 (1), 295–316. Olper, A., D. Curzi, and V. Raimondi (2017). Imported intermediate inputs and firmsâ productivity growth: Evidence from the food industry. Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1), 280–300. Ramanarayanan, A. (2012). Imported Inputs and the Gains from Trade. 2012 Meeting Papers 612, Society for Economic Dynamics. 29 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/91757 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Trade costs, import penetration, and markups. (deposited 02 Apr 2018 22:03)
- Trade costs, import penetration, and markups. (deposited 28 Jan 2019 10:44) [Currently Displayed]
- Trade costs, import penetration, and markups. (deposited 04 Apr 2018 12:45)