Mercosur- EU Trade negotiations: ending trade diversion, strengthening trade institutions

Nogues, Julio J. (2017): Mercosur- EU Trade negotiations: ending trade diversion, strengthening trade institutions. Published in: Trade, Law and Development , Vol. IX, No. 1 (2017): pp. 1-30.

Abstract

After a long impasse, Mercosur and the European Union are once again negotiating to reach a Free Trade Agreement. The benefits from such a trade liberalization would be significant since these are essentially complementary economic regions. An agreement would also end decades of costly trade diversion effects and few of these are quantified in this paper. But, trade is only one of the important issues in these negotiations. The biggest Mercosur countries are making efforts towards leaving behind a decade long experiment with populism that violated several World Trade Organisation rules while Europe is increasingly being threatened by right wing populism that is outspoken in favor of inward-looking economic and social policies. A Mercosur-EU would create a significant economic region with enormous potential for trade creation; such an agreement would also serve to strengthen western trade institutions and challenge the populist threats that is hanging over both of these regions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Mercosur, EU, trade diversion, trade institutions
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F55 - International Institutional Arrangements

References

References Anderson, J. and Y. Yotov (2011), “Terms of Trade and Global Efficiency Effects of Free Trade Agreements, 1990-2002”, NBER Working Paper 17.003.

Anderson, K. and J. Swinnen (2009), “Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Eastern Europe and Central Asia”, The World Bank, Agricultural Distortions Working Paper No. 23: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRADERESEARCH/Resources/544824

Baracat, E. R. Leon, J.M. Finger and J. Nogues (2013). Sustaining Trade Reform: Institutional Lessons from Argentina and Peru: 14(2) WORLD TRADE REV . 579 – 615.

Berumen, S. (1997). “Closer European Union with Eastern Europe: Implications for Latin America”. Mimeo.

Bierut, B and K. Kuziemska-Pawlak (2016). “Competitiveness and Export Performance of CEE Countries”, Narodowy Bank Polski, Working Paper No. 248, 2016:

Boulanger, P. and others (2016). “Cumulative Economic Impact Effects of Future Trade Agreements on EU Agriculture”, JRC Science for Policy Report, EUR 28206, 2016.

Ciaian, P. and J. Swinnen (2007). “Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Central and Eastern Europe”, The World Bank, Agricultural Distortions, Working Paper No. 07: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTTRADERESEARCH/Resources/544824

Ciaian, P., Drabik, D. and J. Pokrivcak (2007). “Trade Creation and Diversion in the Enlarged EU Market: Evidence for Agricultural Trade in Slovakia”, Slovakia, 57 Czech J. of Eco. and Fin., 9-10: http://journal.fsv.cuni.cz/storage/1086_fau_9_10_2007_00000021.pdf

Chang, W. and L. A. Winters (1999). “How Regional Blocs Affect Excluded Countries: The Price Effects of Mercosur”, 92 American Economic Review 889-904.

Europa (2006). “Enlargement Two Years After: An Economic Evaluation, Bureau of European Policy Advisors: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/pages/publication7548_en.pdf.

European Commission (1996). Trade Creation and Trade Diversion”. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/economic-reports/docs/studies/stud12_en.pdf

Finger, J. M. and J. Nogués (2002). “The Unbalanced Uruguay Round: The New Areas in Future WTO Negotiations”, Vol 25, The World Economy.

Gasiorek, A. and S. Smith (1996). “Trade Creation and Trade Diversion”, The Single Market Review Series of the European Union: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/economic-reports/docs/studies/stud12_en.pdf

Goto, J. (1997). “Regional Economic Integration and Agricultural Trade”, The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1805, 1997: http://aei.pitt.edu/40233/1/WD_377_Messerlin_Mercosur-EU_Trade.pdf.

Hufbauer, G. (2017). “President, Trump Can Shackle Trade. But Will He?”, Peterson Inst. for Int’l Eco. (Jan. 5): https://piie.com/blogs/trade-investment-policywatch/

Josling, T. (2009). “Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in Western Europe”, The World Bank, Agricultural Distortions Working Paper No. 61.

Judis, J. (2016). “The Populist Explosion: How the Great Recession Transformed American and European Politics”, Columbia Global Reports.

Keogh, M. (2016). “The Impact on Australian Agriculture of Britain Leaving the EU”, Australian Farm Institute.

Levitsky, S. and K. Roberts, “The Resurgence of the Latin American Left” , The Johns Hopkins Press: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/394272/mod_resource/content/1/The%20Resurgence%20of%20the%20Latin%20Ame%20-%20Steven%20Levitsky%20Intro.pdf

Machinea, J. (2017). “Populismos latinoamericanos a comienzos del siglo XXI: una caracterización económica”, in Funglode and Fondation Maison des Sciences de l’Homme (Paris).

Messerlin, P. (2013). “The Mercosur-EU Preferential Trading Agreement: A view from Europe”, Centre for European Policy Studies, Working Document No. 377, 2013: http://aei.pitt.edu/40233/1/WD_377_Messerlin_Mercosur-EU_Trade.pdf

Monteagudo, J. and W. Watanuki (2002). “Regional Trade Agreements For Mercosur: A Comparison Between the FTAA and FTA with the EU”, 2 ÉCONOMIE INTERNATIONALE 53-76, https://www.cairn.info/revue-economieinternationale-2003-2-page-53.htm

Nogués, J. (2003). “Mercosur Labyrinth and World Regionalism”, 40, Cuadernos de Economia: http://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717- 68212003012100010

Nogués, J. (2015). “Barreras sobre las exportaciones agropecuarias de Argentina 2007-2015: impactos económicos y sociales de su eliminación”, The World Bank, Working Paper No. 3: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83223/

Nunnekamp, P. (1998). “Efectos para America Latina de la Expansion de la Union Europea”, Comision Economica para America Latina y el Caribe, 64, 111-127.

OECD (2000). “The EU Policies and their Economic Effects”: http://www.oecd.org/economy/growth/1886277.pdf

OECD (2015). “Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation”: https://www.oecd.org/tad/agricultural-policies/monitoring-evaluation-2015-highlightsjuly-2015.pdf

Oliver, C. and T. Buck (2016). “France Leads Revolt Against Mercosur Trade Talks”, Financial Times (May 5): https://www.ft.com/content/d7ac18ec-12a9-11e6-839f-2922947098f0.

WTO (2012). “Joint Statement by Australia, The European Union, Israel, Japan, Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Panama, Switzerland, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, Turkey and The United States”, Council for the Trade in Goods, Argentina’s Import Restricting Policies and Practices WTO Doc. G/C/W/667 (Apr. 4).