Everything that Rises Must Converge: Huaicos, the Spirit of Solidarity and the Asymmetrical Uses of Humanitarian Aid in Peru

Leon, Vicente and Bird, Matthew and Leon, Erika and Hidalgo, Alejandra (2018): Everything that Rises Must Converge: Huaicos, the Spirit of Solidarity and the Asymmetrical Uses of Humanitarian Aid in Peru.

Abstract

The huaicos and flooding caused in 2017 by the El Niño Costero phenomenon mobilized Peruvian society to give humanitarian aid. But to what extent did the humanitarian agenda and the victims’ needs misalign, and what are the implications for this asymmetry for the reproduction of pre-existing social relations? We answer these questions via a qualitative study with 80 interviews and 30 participant observation notes covering state and private actors and victims. The disaster created by the huaicos challenged the response capacity and accentuated social hierarchies. Humanitarian aid temporarily activated a spirit of solidarity that created an asymmetrical exchange of material and symbolic goods, which resulted in multiple uses for the aid. For example, those who donated goods also received recognition from the victims generating warm glow and prestige. But to what extent were the voices of the affected heard? This research contributes to the identification of practical ways to make humanitarian aid more efficient. To this end, we incorporate anthropology of disaster, subaltern studies, and economic anthropology frameworks. Deepening our ethnographic knowledge of organizational cultures and their discourses about charity, solidarity, and social justice is fundamental to incorporating local perspectives and ensuring that disasters transform society, rather than reproduce social inequalities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Disasters, exchange, reciprocity, redistribution, humanitarian aid
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming

References

Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence. Journal of Political Economy 97(6): 1447-1458.

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Rabelais and his World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Boulding, K. (1992). “Notes on a Theory of Philanthropy.” In F. Dickinson, Philanthropy and Public Policy, Cambridge, MA: NBER: 57-72.

Cannon, T. (1994). “Vulnerability Analysis and the Explanation of ‘Natural Disasters’. In Varley Ann: Disasters, Development and Environment. Pp. 13-30

Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of our Own Dreams. New York: Palgrave

Henry, D. (2005) Anthropological Contributions to the Study of Disasters. In D. McEntire and W. Blanchard, eds. Disciplines, Disasters and Emergency Management: The Convergence and Divergence of Concepts, Issues and Trends from Research Literature. Emittsburg, MD: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

Instituto Nacional de Defensa Civil (INDECI). (2010) Terminología de Defensa Civil - Perú. Lima: INDECI. Dirección Nacional de Educación y Capacitación.

Killen, M., & Smetana, J. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of Moral Development. Psychology Press.

Levi-Strauss, C. (1969). The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Beacon Press. Boston.

Malinowski, B. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

Maskrey, Andrew (ed.). (1993). Los desastres no son naturales. Lima: La Red.

Mauss, M (1990). The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge Press.

Oliver-Smith, O. (2009) “Anthropology and the Political Economy of Disasters”. In Eric C. Jones and Arthur D. Murphy (eds.), The Political Economy of Hazards and Disasters. Lapham, MD: AltaMira Press: 11-28

-----. (1996) Anthropological Research on Hazards and Disasters. In Annual Review of Anthropology 25: 303-328.

Oliver-Smith A., and Susannah M. Hoffman. (1999) “What is a Disaster? Anthropological Perspectives on a Persistent Question.” In Oliver-Smith and Susannah M. Hoffman The Angry Earth: Disaster in Anthropological Perspective. London: Routledge: 18-34,

-----. (2002) Why Anthropologists Should Study Disasters. In: Catastrophe & Culture; The Anthropology of Disaster. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press. Pp. 3- 22.

Parry, J. (1986). “The Gift, The Indian Gift, and the “Indian Gill”, Man 21. 453 47).

Pérez-Sales, P. (2002). La concepción psicosocial y comunitaria del trabajo en catástrofes. Nuevas perspectivas en el marco de la elaboración de un programa internacional de formación de formadores. Cuadernos de psiquiatría comunitaria 2(1), pp. 6-17.

Portocarrero et. al. (2005). La Iglesia Católica como proveedora de servicios sociales: mitos y realidades. Documento de trabajo N°69. Lima: Centro de Investigación de la Universidad del Pacífico.

RPP Noticias. (22 de marzo del 2017). Así se organizan los ministros para atender las zonas afectadas por los huaicos. RPP, http://rpp.pe/politica/gobierno/asi-se-organizan-los-ministros-para-atender-las-zonas-afectadas-por-los-huaicos-noticia-1038713.

Sahlins, M (1972) Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine & Atherton, Inc.

Sillitoe, P. (2006). “Why Spheres of Exchange.” Ethnology 45(1): 16

Strathern. H. (1988). The Gender of the Guilt. University of California Press. Berkeley

Sulek, M. (2010). On the Modern Meaning of Philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, Vol. 39, N°2, pp. 193-212.

Weiner. A. (1992). Inalienable Possessions. University of California Press, Berkeley