Heterogeneous Consumer Preference for Seafood Sustainability in Japan

Wakamatsu, Hiroki (2019): Heterogeneous Consumer Preference for Seafood Sustainability in Japan.

Abstract

This study estimates Japanese consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for several components of seafood sustainability. A choice experiment via a web survey is conducted among Japanese seafood consumers. In order to estimate WTP, a latent class model is employed to treat heterogeneity of consumer preference in addition to a basic conditional logit model. The latent class model resulted in separating consumers into two characteristic groups: nature-oriented and human-oriented groups. Neither group was found to be willing to pay for seafood sustainability even though they are somewhat concerned about seafood sustainability. Specifically, the nature-oriented group, which comprised 51% of our consumer sample, negatively evaluated fisheries management and preservation of tradition and culture but highly evaluated the environment and ecosystems. Meanwhile, the human-oriented group, which comprised 49% of our consumer sample, positively evaluated fisheries management and regionality, but negatively evaluated the environment and ecosystems. The differences between the groups are unrelated to education or income, but are related to seafood expense, age, family structure, and knowledge of sustainability.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: best–worst scaling, choice experiment, consumer preference, seafood sustainability
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q01 - Sustainable Development; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q22 - Fishery ; Aquaculture; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects

References

Aizaki, H., Nakatani, T., & Sato, K. (2015). Stated preference methods using R. Florida: CRC Press.

Asche, F., Larsen, T.A., Smith, M.D., Sogn-Grundvåg, G., & Young, J.A. (2015). Pricing of eco-labels with retailer heterogeneity. Food Policy, 53, 82-93.

Bronnmann, J., & Asche, F. (2016). The value of product attributes, brands and private labels: An analysis of frozen seafood in Germany. Journal of Agricultural Economics 67, 231–44.

FAO. (1995). Code of conduct for responsible Fisheries. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

FAO. (2014). The State of world fisheries and aquaculture 2014. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

Finn, A., & Louviere, J.J. (1992). Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: the case of food safety. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing. 11, 12-25.

Gudmundsson, E., & Wessells, C.R. (2000). Ecolabeling seafood for sustainable production: Implications for fisheries management. Marine Resource Economics. 15, 97-113.

Hobday, A., Ogier, E., Fleming, A., Hartog, J., Thomas, L., Stobutzki, I., & Finn, M. (2016). Fishery status reports : Healthcheck for Australian Fisheries. Deakin West: Fisheries Research and Development Corporation.

Hole, A.R. (2007). Estimating mixed logit models using maximum simulated likelihood. Stata Journal. 7, 388-401.

Jedidi, K., Ramaswamy, V., & Desarbo, W. (1993). A maximum likelihood method for latent class regression involving a censored dependent variable. Psychometrika. 58, 375-394.

Johnston, R.J., Wessells, C.R., Donath, H., & Asche, F. (2001). A contingent choice analysis of ecolabeled seafood: Comparing consumer preferences in the United States and Norway. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 26, 20-39.

Kuriyama, K., Hanemann, M.W., & Hilger, J.R. (2010). A latent segmentation approach to a Kuhn–Tucker model: An application to recreation demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management. 60, 209-220.

Louviere, J.J., & Woodworth, G.G. (1991). Best-worst scaling: A model for the largest difference judgments. Alberta: University of Alberta.

Mitchell, T.M. (1977). Machine learning. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw Hill. Pacifico, D., & Yoo, H.I. (2913). lclogit: A Stata command for fitting latent-class conditional logit models via the expectation-maximization algorithm. Stata Journal. 13, 625-639.

Roheim, C.A., Asche, F., & Santos, J.I. (2011). The Elusive price premium for ecolabeled products: Evidence from seafood in the UK Mmrket. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 62, 655-668.

Sampei, Y., & Aoyagi-Usui, M. (2009). Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan’s national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Global Environmental Change. 19, 203-212.

Thøgersen, J., & Nielsen, K.S. (2016). A better carbon footprint label. Journal of Cleaner Production. 125, 86-94.

Uchida, H., Onozaka, Y., Morita, T., & Managi, S. (2014). Demand for ecolabeled seafood in the Japanese market: A conjoint analysis of the impact of information and interaction with other labels. Food Policy. 44, 68-76.

Uchida, H., Roheim, C.A., Wakamatsu, H., & Anderson, C.M. (2013). Do Japanese consumers care about sustainable fisheries? Evidence from an auction of ecolabelled seafood. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics. 58, 263-280.

Wakamatsu, H., C.M. Anderson, H. Uchida, & C.A. Roheim. (2017). Pricing ecolabeled seafood products with heterogeneous preferences: An auction experiment in Japan. Marine Resource Economics 32, 277-294.