Does information matter? Transparency and demand for accountability in Ghana's natural resource revenue management

Brunnschweiler, Christa and Edjekumhene, Ishmael and Lujala, Päivi (2019): Does information matter? Transparency and demand for accountability in Ghana's natural resource revenue management.

Abstract

Transparency in resource revenue management is frequently cited as an important strategy to avoid misuse and misappropriation. The underlying theory proposes that transparency will allow citizens to gain (more) information on their country’s revenues and their management; better informed citizens in turn will be able to contribute to the debate on national resource governance issues, voice their concerns, and demand improved accountability if necessary. However, there is little micro-level evidence so far to show how transparency policies actually relate to better citizen knowledge, or to any difference in attitudes towards revenue management and in demand for accountability. To address these points, we analyze data from a unique survey of over 3500 Ghanaian citizens to understand how Ghana’s extractive sector transparency measures are linked to citizens’ knowledge, rights perception, satisfaction levels, and behavior regarding resource revenue management. Our results suggest that information levels among citizens are generally quite poor; however, there is a strong sense of citizens’ right to benefit from resource revenues. Satisfaction with the current use of natural resource revenues is very low; yet, few respondents have sought more information, or even discussed resource revenue management with friends or family. The results also hold for elected representatives, who should be best placed to influence resource governance. The findings imply that the transparency discourse may hinge on false assumptions of the effects of information in resource revenue management. If the policy is to work as a way of increasing accountability of government towards citizens, the focus may need to shift to informing civil society organizations in particular, rather than simply making information available as widely as possible.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: transparency, accountability, survey data, Ghana, natural resources, petroleum
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q3 - Nonrenewable Resources and Conservation > Q38 - Government Policy

References

Aaronson, S. A. (2011). Limited partnership: Business, government, civil society, and the public in the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI). Public Administration and Development 31(1): 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.588

Adusei, L. A.(2018). “Why Norway benefited from its oil and Ghana has not benefited from its gold”, Article published in Business and Financial Times, January 9, 2018.

Armand, A., Costa, A. I., Coutts, A., Vicente, P., and Vilela, I. (2018). On the mechanics of the political resource curse: Behavioral measurements of information and local elite behaviour in Mozambique, Final Report (S-89330-MOZ-1), International Growth Centre, London.

Ayee, J., Søreide, T., Shukla, G. P. and Le, T. M. (2011). ‘Political economy of the mining sector in Ghana’, Policy Research Working Paper 5730. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Bellver, A. and D. Kaufmann (2005). Transparenting transparency: initial empirics and policy applications. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.

Buijze, A. (2013). The six faces of transparency. Utrecht Law Review 9(3): 3–25. DOI: http://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.233

Corrigan, C. C. (2014). Breaking the resource curse: Transparency in the natural resource sector and the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Resources Policy 41: 17–30.

David-Barrett, E., & Okamura, K. (2016). Norm diffusion and reputation: the rise of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Governance 29(2): 227–246.

Duayeden, K. A., & Armah-Attoh, D. (2018). Afrobarometer Round 7 Survey in Ghana, 2017: Summary of results. Accra: CDD-Ghana.

Edjekumhene, I., D. Inkoom, C. K. Owusu (2018). Examining transparency and accountability within the oil and gas sector: Impact evaluation of key provisions in Ghana’s Petroleum Revenue Management Act. KITE (Ghana), Final Process Evaluation Report TW8/1002.

EITI (2016). The EITI Standard 2016. Retrieved from Oslo: https://eiti.org/files/english_eiti_standard_0.pdf

Epremian, L., Lujala, P., & Bruch, C. (2016). High-Value Natural Resources and Transparency: Accounting for Revenues and Governance. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.21

FES (Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung) (2016). A Guide to District Assemblies in Ghana. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Ghana and Institute of Local Government Studies.

Fiankor, D. K., & Akussah, H. (2012). Information use and policy decision making by district assembly members in Ghana. Information Development 28(1): 32–42.

Florini, A. M. (2007). Introduction: The battle over transparency. In A. M. Florini (Ed.), The right to know: Transparency for an open world (pp. 1–18). New York: Columbia University Press.

Fox, J. (2015). Social Accountability: What Does the Evidence Really Say? World Development 72: 346-361.

Gillies, A., & Heuty, A. (2011). Does transparency work? The challenges of measurement and effectiveness in resource-rich countries. Yale Journal of International Affairs (Spring-Summer): 25-42.

Haufler, V. (2010). Disclosure as governance: The extractive industries transparency initiative and resource management in the developing world. Global Environmental Politics, 10 (3), 53-73

Heald, D. (2006). Transparency as an instrumental value. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge (U.S.A.) and London (UK): Harvard University Press.

Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education 21(3): 8-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743..

Joshi, A. (2013). Do They Work? Assessing the Impact of Transparency and Accountability Initiatives in Service Delivery. Development Policy Review 31 (S1): s29-s48. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12018

Kasekende, E., Abuka, C., & Sarr, M. (2016). Extractive industries and corruption: Investigating the effectiveness of EITI as scrutiny mechanism. Resources Policy 48: 117-128.

Kolstad, I., & Wiig, A. (2009). Is transparency the key to reducing corruption in resource-rich countries? World Development 37(3): 521–532.

Kollmuss A. & J. Agyeman (2002). Mind the Gap: “Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?, Environmental Education Research 8(3): 239-260

Lujala, P., & Epremian, L. (2017). Transparency and natural resource revenue management: Empowering the public with information? In A. Williams & P. Le Billon (Eds.), Corruption, Natural Resources and Development, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lujala, Päivi 2018. An analysis of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative implementation process. World Development 107(July): 358–381.

Lujala, P., Brunnschweiler, C., & Edjekumhene, I. (2018). Transparent for whom? Dissemination of information on Ghana’s petroleum and mining revenue management. MPRA working paper n. 84788.

McDevitt, A. (2017). Transparency and Accountability in the Extractives Sector. K4D Helpdesk Report. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies

Mejía Acosta, A. (2013). The impact and effectiveness of accountability and transparency initiatives: The governance of natural resources. Development Policy Review 31: 89–105.

Ministry of Finance, (2018). The Budget Statement and Economic Policy of Government of Ghana for 2018 Financial Year, Accra (Ghana).

Ofori, J. J. Y., & Lujala, P. (2015). Illusionary Transparency? Oil Revenues, Information Disclosure, and Transparency. Society & Natural Resources 28(11): 1187–1202. doi:10.1080/08941920.2015.1024806

Öge, K. (2014). The limits of transparency promotion in Azerbaijan: External remedies to “reverse the curse.” Europe-Asia Studies 66: 1482–1500.

Rustad, Siri A., Philippe Le Billon and Päivi Lujala 2017. Has the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative been a success? Identifying and evaluating EITI goals. Resources Policy 51(1): 151-162.

Scanteam (2011). Achievements and Strategic Options: Evaluation of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Final Report, Oslo.

Sovacool, B.K. and Andrews, N. (2015) Does Transparency Matter? Evaluating the Governance Impacts of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI) in Azerbaijan and Liberia. Resources Policy 45: 183-192.

Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). What is the role of the state? In M. Humphreys, J. D. Sachs, & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), Escaping the resource curse, New York: Columbia University Press.

Van Alstine, J. (2014). Transparency in Resource Governance: The Pitfalls and Potential of “New Oil” in Sub-Saharan Africa. Global Environmental Politics 14(1): 20–39.

van der Ploeg, F. (2011). Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing? Journal of Economic Literature 49(2): 366-420. doi:10.1257/jel.49.2.366

World Bank (2003). ‘Project performance assessment report, Ghana: Mining Sector Rehabilitation Project (Credit 1921-GH) and Mining Sector Development and Environment Project (Credit 2743-GH)’. Washington, DC: World Bank.