Can a Green Tax Reform Entail Employment Double Dividend in European and non-European Countries? A Survey of the Empirical Evidence

Maxim, Maruf Rahman and Zander, Kerstin (2019): Can a Green Tax Reform Entail Employment Double Dividend in European and non-European Countries? A Survey of the Empirical Evidence. Published in: International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy , Vol. 9, No. 3 (4 April 2019): pp. 219-228.

Abstract

This paper synthesises the simulation studies concerning green tax reform (GTR) and employment double dividend (EDD) in European and non-European countries. The studies included investigate the effect of GTR on employment. We compared the simulation results between European and non-European countries to understand the impact of study region and our findings are fivefold. First, the simulation results suggest that GTR-driven EDD is observed in both European and non-European countries, but the average effect on employment in European countries (0.67%) is significantly greater than in non-European countries (0.18%). Second, optimal tax and tax revenue recycling policies in European and non-European countries for EDD are not identical. Reducing employers’ social security contributions (SSC) has the potential to generate EDD in both countries. However, a reduction in value added tax has the highest average effect on employment in European countries (1.62%), which negatively affects employment in non-European countries (−0.02%). Third, a reduction in personal income tax as a tax recycling method creates a marginally average employment dividend in non-European countries (0.16%) but is counterproductive in European countries (−0.15%). Fourth, other taxes, which predominantly represent mixed taxes, exhibit the highest EDD potential in both European (1.01%) and non-European (0.46%) countries. Finally, employment dividend diminishes over time, but a weak quadratic pattern has been observed that reveals an accelerating effect on employment in the long term. These reflections should be considered before employing GTR in non-European countries in order to yield EDD.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Green Tax Reform, Double Dividend, Employment
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H21 - Efficiency ; Optimal Taxation; H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies

References

ANDRÉ, F. J., CARDENETE, M. A. & VELÁZQUEZ, E. 2005. Performing an environmental tax reform in a regional economy. A computable general equilibrium approach. The Annals of Regional Science, 39, 375-392.

ANGER, N., BÖHRINGER, C. & LÖSCHEL, A. 2010. Paying the piper and calling the tune?: A meta-regression analysis of the double-dividend hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 69, 1495-1502.

BACH, S., KOHLHAAS, M., MEYER, B., PRAETORIUS, B. & WELSCH, H. 2002. The effects of environmental fiscal reform in Germany: a simulation study. Energy policy, 30, 803-811. BACH, S., KOHLHAAS, M. & PRAETORIUS, B. 1994. Ecological tax reform even if Germany has to go it alone. Economic Bulletin, 31, 3-10.

BARDAZZI, R. 1996. A Reduction in Social Security Contributions: which Alternatives for Financing Coverage? Economic Systems Research, 8, 247-270.

BARKER, T., BAYLIS, S. & MADSEN, P. 1993. A UK carbon/energy tax: The macroeconomics effects. Energy Policy, 21, 296-308.

BARKER, T. & KÖHLER, J. 1998. Equity and ecotax reform in the EU: achieving a 10 per cent reduction in CO2 emissions using excise duties. Fiscal Studies, 19, 375-402.

BASSI, S., TEN BRINK, P., PALLEMAERTS, M. & VON HOMEYER, I. 2009. Feasibility of Implementing A Radical ETR and its Acceptance Study of tax reform in Europe over the next decades: implication for the environment for eco-innovation and for household distribution. European Environmental Agency.

BOR, Y. J. & HUANG, Y. 2010. Energy taxation and the double dividend effect in Taiwan's energy conservation policy—an empirical study using a computable general equilibrium model. Energy Policy, 38, 2086-2100.

BOSELLO, F. & CARRARO, C. 2001. Recycling energy taxes: impacts on a disaggregated labour market. Energy Economics, 23, 569-594.

BOSQUET, B. 2000. Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence. Ecological Economics, 34, 19-32.

BOSSIER, F. & BRÉCHET, T. 1995. A fiscal reform for increasing employment and mitigating CO2 emissions in Europe. Energy Policy, 23, 789-798.

BOVENBERG, A. L. & GOULDER, L. H. 1996. Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General- Equilibrium Analyses. The American Economic Review, 86, 985-1000.

CARRARO, C., GALEOTTI, M. & GALLO, M. 1996. Environmental taxation and unemployment: some evidence on the ‘double dividend hypothesis’ in Europe. Journal of Public Economics, 62, 141-181.

CIASCHINI, M., PRETAROLI, R., SEVERINI, F. & SOCCI, C. 2012. Regional double dividend from environmental tax reform: An application for the Italian economy. Research in Economics, 66, 273-283.

CONRAD, K. & LÖSCHEL, A. 2005. RECYCLING OF ECO-TAXES, LABOR MARKET EFFECTS AND THE TRUE COST OF LABOR--A CGE ANALYSIS. Journal of Applied Economics, 8, 259-278.

DE MIGUEL, C. & MANZANO, B. 2011. Gradual green tax reforms. Energy Economics, 33, S50-S58.

DE MOOIJ, R. A. & BOVENBERG, A. L. 1998. Environmental taxes, international capital mobility and inefficient tax systems: Tax burden vs. tax shifting. International Tax and Public Finance, 5, 7-39.

DRESNER, S., DUNNE, L., CLINCH, P. & BEUERMANN, C. 2006. Social and political responses to ecological tax reform in Europe: an introduction to the special issue. Energy Policy, 34, 895-904.

EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY 1996. Environmental Taxes: Implementation and Environmental Effectiveness. In: GEE, D. (ed.) Environmental Issues Series No. 1. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency

FELDER, S. & VAN NIEUWKOOP, R. 1996. Revenue recycling of a CO2 tax: Results from a general equilibrium model for Switzerland. Annals of Operations Research, 68, 233-265.

GAFFNEY, M. 1972. Land Rent, Taxation, and Public Policy: The Sources, Nature and Functions of Urban Land Rent. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 31, 241-257.

GOULDER, L. H. 1995. Environmental taxation and the double dividend: A reader's guide. International Tax and Public Finance, 2, 157-183.

HOLMLUND, B. & KOLM, A.-S. 2000. Environmental tax reform in a small open economy with structural unemployment. International Tax and Public Finance, 7, 315-333.

JANSEN, H. & KLAASSEN, G. 2000. Economic impacts of the 1997 EU energy tax: simulations with three EU-wide models. Environmental and Resource Economics, 15, 179-197.

JORGENSON, D. W. & WILCOXEN, P. J. 1993. Reducing US carbon emissions: an econometric general equilibrium assessment. Resource and Energy Economics, 15, 7-25.

KEMFERT, C. & WELSCH, H. 2000. Energy-Capital-Labor Substitution and the Economic Effects of CO2 Abatement: Evidence for Germany. Journal of Policy Modeling, 22, 641-660.

KILIMANI, N. 2014. Water Taxation and the Double Dividend Hypothesis. University of Pretoria, Department of Economics.

LAWN, P. 2006. Ecological tax reform and the double dividend of ecological sustainability and low unemployment: an empirical assessment. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 2, 332-358.

LEE, D. R. & MISIOLEK, W. S. 1986. Substituting pollution taxation for general taxation: Some implications for efficiency in pollutions taxation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 13, 338-347.

LEE, S., POLLITT, H. & UETA, K. 2012. An assessment of Japanese carbon tax reform using the E3MG econometric model. The Scientific World Journal, 2012.

LIU, Y. & LU, Y. 2015. The Economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: A model-based scenario analysis. Applied Energy, 141, 96-105.

MABEY, N. & NIXON, J. 1997. Are Environmental Taxes a Free Lunch? Issues in Modelling the Macroeconomic Effects of Carbon Taxes. Energy Economics, 19, 29-56.

MANRESA, A. & SANCHO, F. 2005. Implementing a double dividend: recycling ecotaxes towards lower labour taxes. Energy Policy, 33, 1577-1585.

MARKANDYA, A., GONZÁLEZ-EGUINO, M. & ESCAPA, M. 2013. From shadow to green: Linking environmental fiscal reforms and the informal economy. Energy Economics, 40, S108-S118.

METCALF, G. E. 2000. Green Taxes: Economic Theory and Empirical Evidence From Scandinavia. JSTOR.

MIRHOSSEINI, S. S., MAHMOUDI, N. & VALOKOLAIE, S. N. P. 2017. Investigating the relationship between green tax reforms and shadow economy using a CGE model - A case study in Iran. Iranian Economic Review, 21, 153-167.

MORRIS, G. E., REVESZ, T., ZALAI, E. & FUCSKO, J. 1999. Integrating environmental taxes on local air pollutants with fiscal reform in Hungary: Simulations with a computable general equilibrium model. Environment and Development Economics, 4, 537-564.

O'RYAN, R., DE MIGUEL, C. J., MILLER, S. & MUNASINGHE, M. 2005. Computable general equilibrium model analysis of economywide cross effects of social and environmental policies in Chile. Ecological Economics, 54, 447-472.

OATES, W. E. 1993. Pollution Charges as a Source of Public Revenues. In: GIERSCH, H. (ed.) Economic Progress and Environmental Concerns. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

OECD 2015. Towards Green Growth? PARRY, I. W. 1995. Pollution taxes and revenue recycling. Journal of Environmental Economics and management, 29, S64-S77.

PATUELLI, R., NIJKAMP, P. & PELS, E. 2005. Environmental tax reform and the double dividend: A meta-analytical performance assessment. Ecological Economics, 55, 564-583.

PEARCE, D. 1991. The Role of Carbon Taxes in Adjusting to Global Warming. Economic Journal, 101, 938-48.

PEREIRA, A. M. & PEREIRA, R. M. 2014. Environmental fiscal reform and fiscal consolidation: the quest for the third dividend in Portugal. Public Finance Review, 42, 222-253.

POLLITT, H., PARK, S.-J., LEE, S. & UETA, K. 2014. An economic and environmental assessment of future electricity generation mixes in Japan–an assessment using the E3MG macro-econometric model. Energy Policy, 67, 243-254.

REPETTO, R. 1996. Shifting taxes from value added to material inputs. In: CARRARO, C. & SINISCALCO, D. (eds.) Environmental Fiscal Reform and Unemployment. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

REPETTO, R., DOWER, R., JENKINS, R. & GEOGEGHAN, J. 1992. Green fees : how a tax shift can work for the environment and the economy / Robert Repetto ... [et al.], Washington, DC, World Resources Institute.

ROSON, R. 2003. Climate change policies and tax recycling schemes: simulations with a dynamic general equilibrium model of the Italian economy. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 15, 26-44.

SAHLÉN, L. & STAGE, J. 2012. Environmental Fiscal Reform in Namibia:A Potential Approach to Reduce Poverty? The Journal of Environment & Development, 21, 219-243.

SAVEYN, B., VAN REGEMORTER, D. & CISCAR, J. C. 2011. Economic analysis of the climate pledges of the Copenhagen Accord for the EU and other major countries. Energy Economics, 33, Supplement 1, S34-S40.

SCHÖB, R. 2003. The Double Dividend Hypothesis of Environmental Taxes: A Survey. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.

TERKLA, D. 1984. The efficiency value of effluent tax revenues. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 11, 107-123.

TETSUO, O. 2003. Environmental Tax Policy and Long-Run Economic Growth. The Japanese Economic Review, 54, 203-217. TULLOCK, G. 1967. Excess benefit. Water Resources Research, 3, 643-644.

VAN HEERDEN, J., GERLAGH, R., BLIGNAUT, J., HORRIDGE, M., HESS, S., MABUGU, R. & MABUGU, M. 2006. Searching for Triple Dividends in South Africa: Fighting CO2 pollution and poverty while promoting growth. Energy Journal, 27, 113-141.

VANDYCK, T. & VAN REGEMORTER, D. 2014. Distributional and regional economic impact of energy taxes in Belgium. Energy Policy, 72, 190-203.

WELSCH, H. & EHRENHEIM, V. 2004. Environmental fiscal reform in Germany: a computable general equilibrium analysis. Environmental economics and policy studies, 6, 197-219.