Bhattarai, Keshab (2015): Constitution, Institutions and A Model for Economic Development in Nepal.
PDF
MPRA_paper_93261.pdf Download (741kB) |
Abstract
Nepal made significant progress in removing monarchy and terrors of Maoists in the last decade. It however lacks a stable solution for speedier economic growth and development as the major political parties are still struggling to institutionalize the new political framework set up by the new constitution of Nepal that was promulgated by the Constitution Assembly of Nepal (CAN-II ) for the federal democratic republic of Nepal on 20 September 2015. Nepalese economy crippled by the terrible earthquake of April 2015 got further paralyzed by the undeclared blockade from India that was afraid of separatist movements in southern Nepal. NC led government managed to conduct free and fair elections of central, provincial and local governments by the end of 2017 in which the NCP, a new allaince of communist CPN-UML and CPN-Maoist parties was able to secure the absolute majority based on radical manifesto promises relegating the NC to a weak opposition. The NCP government has however failed totally to implement its promises in practice bringing inclusive programmes suitable to multi-ethnic, multi-climatic and multi-cultural and multi-linguistic economy and society. Corruption has spread further from the top to the bottom. Quality of institutions, leadership and the governance has further deteriorated. Faster growth and economic growth and development is not possible unless the new system sticks to a dynamic model for a decentralized economy updating beliefs that can improve the well-being of people and transform Nepal into a modern, vibrant, and market oriented dynamic economy. Nepal should avoid economically and topographically unrealistic trans-Himalayan trade-efforts with China and should improve mutual and natural understanding and cooperation with India to sustain growth in the long run.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Constitution, Institutions and A Model for Economic Development in Nepal |
English Title: | Constitution, Institutions and A Model for Economic Development in Nepal |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | constitution, institution, Nepal, economic growth and development |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies P - Economic Systems > P3 - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions > P37 - Legal Institutions ; Illegal Behavior P - Economic Systems > P5 - Comparative Economic Systems |
Item ID: | 93261 |
Depositing User: | Dr Keshab Bhattarai |
Date Deposited: | 12 Apr 2019 04:33 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 16:45 |
References: | Acemoglu D, S Johnson, JA Robinson (2005) Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth, Handbook of Economic Growth, 2005 - Elsevier Alberto Alesina, Guido Tabellini. 2007. Bureaucrats or Politicians? Part I: A Single Policy Task, American Economic Review 97:1, 169-179 Araral E. 2014. Policy and regulatory design for developing countries: a mechanism design and transaction cost approach. Policy Sciences 47, 289-303 Baral L. R. (2017) Nepal: Trauma of Political Development and Stability, Adroit Publishers, New Delhi Bhattarai K. (2017) Welfare and Distributional Impacts of Financial Liberalization in an Open Economy: Lessons from a Multi-Sectoral Dynamic CGE Model for Nepal, International Business Research, 10, 1, 181-198 Bhattarai K. (2013) Coalition for constitution and economic growth in Nepal, International Journal of Global Studies (IJGS), 1:1, February, 1-4 Bhattarai K. (2011) Constitution and Economic Models for the Federal Republic of Nepal, Economic Journal of Nepal, Vol. 33, No.1, January_March, Issue No. 129, p. 1-15 Bhattarai K. (2011) Empty Core in a Coalition: Why No Constitution in Nepal?, Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 10:1:119-126. Bhattarai K. (2010) Strategic and general equilibrium models of poverty, Romanian Jounral of Economic Forecasting, 13:1:137-150 Bhattarai K. (2007) Models of Economic and Political Growth in Nepal, Serials Publication, New Delhi. Bhattarai K. (2006) Consequences of April 2006 Revolutionary Changes in Nepal: Continuation Nepalese Dilemma, Indian Journal of Economics and Business, 5:2:315-321. Bonfiglioli A., G. Gancia. 2013. Uncertainty, Electoral Incentives and Political Myopia. The Economic Journal 123:568, 373-400. Borgeaud C (1982) The Origin and Development of Written Constitutions, Political Science Quarterly, 7, 4, 613-632 Breuillé ML, S. Zanaj (2013) Mergers in fiscal federalism, Journal of Public Economics, 105, 11--22 Chai, H.; Song, X. (2013) The Adaptive State--Understanding Political Reform in China, Policy Studies, 34, 1,73-88 Che J, Kim-Sau Chung, X. Qiao. 2013. The Good, the Bad, and the Civil Society. Journal of Public Economics, 106, pp.68-76. Constituent Assembly of Nepal (2015) Constitution of Nepal 2015, CA Secretariat, Kathmandu, Nepal. Cripps, M.W.(1997) Bargaining and the Timing of Investment, International Economic Review, 38:3 :Aug.:527-546 De Vanssay, X.; Spindler, Z. A. (1994) Freedom and Growth: Do Constitutions Matter? Public Choice, 78, 3-4, 359-72. Dixit A. (1987) Strategic Behaviour in Contests, American Economic Review, Dec., 77:5:891-898. Hug S. 2009. Some thoughts about referendums, representative democracy, and separation of powers. Constitutional Political Economy 20:3-4, 251-266. Janeba E, S. Osterloh (2013) Tax and the city: A theory of local tax competition, Journal of Public Economics, 106, 89--100 Justin Fox, Kenneth W. Shotts. 2009. Delegates or Trustees? A Theory of Political Accountability,The Journal of Politics 71:04, 1225. Kuhn H. W. (1997) Classics in Game Theory, Princeton University Press. Mailath G. J. and L. Samuelson (2006) Repeated Games and Reputations: Long Run Relationship, Oxford. Maskin E, J. Moore (1999) Implementation and Renegotiation, Review of Economic Studies, 66,1, 39-56 Maskin, Eric, and Jean Tirole. 2004. The Politician and the Judge: Accountability in Government. American Economic Review, 94(4): 1034-1054. Muthoo A, K. A. Shepsle. 2010. Information, institutions and constitutional arrangements. Public Choice 144:1-2, 1-36. Monica, MB, 2014. The Role of Local Officials in New Democracies: Evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Review 104:4, 1244-1287 Myerson R (1986) Multistage game with communication, Econometrica, 54:323-358. Pathak P and T Sönmez (2013) School Admissions Reform in Chicago and England: Comparing Mechanisms by Their Vulnerability to Manipulation. American Economic Review, 103(1): 80-106. Persson, T. (2004) Consequences of Constitutions; Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 2-3, 139-61. Riley J G (2001) Silver Singals: Twenty-Five Years of Screening and Signalling, Journal of Economic Literature, 39:2:432-478 Roth A E. (2008) What have we learned from market design?, Economic Journal, 118 (March), 285--310. Rubinstein A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model, Econometrica, 50:1:97-109. Saleilles R (1895) The Development of the Present Constitution of France, Annals of the American Academy of Political and social Sciene, 6, Jul., 1-78 Shapley L (1953) A Value for n Person Games, Contributions to the Theory of Games II, 307-317, Princeton. Shapley L. S. and M. Shubik (1969) Pure Competition, Coalitional Power, and Fair Division, International Economic Review, 10, 3, 337-362. Sutton J. (1986) Non-Cooperative Bargaining Theory: An Introduction, Review of Economic Studies, 53, 5., 709-724 Straub S. 2011. Infrastructure and Development: A Critical Appraisal of the Macro-level Literature. Journal of Development Studies 47:5, 683-708 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93261 |