Four faces of marginalization: Variations in institutional frameworks of welfare state provisions and social trust in Europe

Tamilina, Larysa and Tamilina, Natalya (2018): Four faces of marginalization: Variations in institutional frameworks of welfare state provisions and social trust in Europe. Forthcoming in:

Abstract

By assuming that marginalization threatens social trust formation, this study introduces a new analytical framework to explain the relationship between a welfare state’s institutional design and trust levels in European societies. A good’s life cycle view consisting of production and consumption is applied to the provision of social benefits to discern four forms of marginalization in an individual’s experience with the welfare state: (a) marginalization through attitude, (b) marginalization through context, (c) marginalization through poverty, and (d) marginalization through opportunity lack. We argue that universalism in benefit provisions minimizes each of the four marginalization forms whereas selectivity is characterized by higher odds of marginalization. We further demonstrate that this especially holds true when universal social programs are generous and the state dedicates substantial resources to their funding. When the state’s resources are scarce, selectivity becomes a good alternative to universalism and may enhance social trust formation among individuals. We tested our hypotheses using data from the European Social Survey (2010).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: welfare state, social trust, institutional design, universal social benefits, selective social benefits.
• Subjects: I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I0 - General > I00 - General; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

References

Arts W and Gelissen J (2002) Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy 12(2): 137–158.

Barber B (1983) The Logic and Limits of Trust. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Bergh A (2011) The rise, fall and revival of the Swedish welfare state: What are the policy lessons from Sweden? IFN Working paper No. 873, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.

Bjørnskov C (2005) The determinants of trust. Working paper. Available at: https://pure.au.dk/ws/files/39599381/cb_trust.pdf.

Bjørnskov C (2007) Determinants of generalized trust: A cross-country comparison. Public Choice 130(1-2): 1–21.

Boix C and Posner DN (2005) Social capital: Explaining its origins and effects on government performance. Available at: http://www.socialcapitalgateway.org/index.htm.

Brehm J and Rahn W (1997) Individual level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 999–1023.

Christoforou A (2004) On the determinants of social capital in countries of the European Union. In: ESPAnet Conference “European social policy: Meeting the needs of a New Europe”, Oxford, England, 9–11 September 2004.

Farrell H (2005) Trust and political economy. Comparative Political Studies 38(5): 459–483.

Hall PA (1999) Social capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 29(3): 417–461.

Herreros F and Criado H (2008) The state and the development of social trust. International Political Science Review 29(1): 53–71.

Jensen C and Svendsen GT (2011) Giving money to strangers: European welfare states and social trust. International Journal of Social Welfare 20(1): 3–9.

Jordahl H (2007) Inequality and trust. IFN Working paper No. 715, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.

Kawachi I, Kennedy BP, Lochner K, et al. (1997) Social capital, income inequality and mortality. American Journal of Public Health 87(9): 1491–1498.

Knack S (2002) Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the states. American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 772–785.

Kumlin S (2004) The Personal and the Political: How Personal Welfare State Experiences Affect Political Trust and Ideology. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Kumlin S and Rothstein B (2007) Making and breaking social capital: The impact of welfare- state institutions. Comparative Political Studies 38(4): 339–365.

Larsen CA (2007) How welfare regimes generate and erode social capital: The impact of underclass phenomena. Comparative Politics 40(1): 83–101.

Lee C (2012) Welfare states and social trust. Comparative Political Studies 46(5): 603–630.

Lewis DJ and Weigert A (1985) Trust as a social reality. Social Forces 63(4): 967–985.

Luke DA (2004) Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Nelson G and Prilleltensky I (Eds) (2005) Community Psychology: In Pursuit of Liberation and Well-being. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Quintanilla VD (2012) Judicial mindsets: The social psychology of implicit theories and the law. Nebraska Law Review 90(3): 611–646.

Rothstein B (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rothstein B (2001a) Social capital in the social democratic welfare state. Politics and Society 29(2): 207–241.

Rothstein B (2001b) The universal welfare state as a social dilemma. Rationality and Society 13(2): 213–233.

Rothstein B (2003) Social capital, economic growth and quality of government: The causal mechanism. New Political Economy 8(1): 49–71.

Rothstein B (2005) Social Traps and the Problem of Trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rothstein B and Stolle D (2001) Social capital and street-level bureaucracy: An institutional theory of generalized trust. In: Trust in Government Conference, Centre for the Study of Democratic Politics, Princeton University, 30 November 2001, pp.1–48.

Rothstein B and Stolle D (2002) How political institutions create and destroy social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. In: 98th meeting of the American Political Science Association in Boston, 29 August–2 September 2002, pp. 1–39.

Rothstein B and Stolle D (2003) Introduction: Social capital in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Political Studies 26(1): 1–26.

Rothstein B and Stolle D (2007) The quality of government and social capital: A theory of political institutions and generalized trust. QoG Working paper series 2007:2, The Quality of Government Institute, Göteborg.

Rothstein B and Stolle D (2008) The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics 40(4): 441–459.

Rothstein B and Uslaner EM (2005) All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics 58(1): 41–72.

Rothstein B and Uslaner EM (2006) All for all: Equality and social trust. Working paper series No. 117, Center for European Studies.

Tillmar M and Lindkvist L (2007) Cooperation against all odds: Finding reasons for trust where formal institutions fail. International Sociology 22(3): 343–366.

Uslaner EM (2000) Trust, democracy and governance. In: The European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Workshop 13 on voluntary associations, social capital, and interest mediation: Forging the link, Copenhagen, Denmark, April 2000.

Van Oorschot W and Arts W (2005) The social capital of European welfare states: The crowding out hypothesis revisited. Journal of European Social Policy 15(1): 5–26.