Asset Liquidity and Fiscal Consolidation Programs

Bernardino, Tiago (2019): Asset Liquidity and Fiscal Consolidation Programs.

Abstract

We argue that the relationship between wealth inequality and fiscal multipliers depends crucially on the type of fiscal experiment used as well as on the measure of the wealth distribution. We calibrate an incomplete-markets, overlapping generations model to different European economies and use Household Finance and Consumption Survey (HFCS) data to compare fiscal multipliers when models are calibrated to match the distribution of liquid vs. net wealth. We find a negative relationship between fiscal multipliers and wealth inequality when considering fiscal consolidation programs, in contrast to fiscal expansions experiments which are standard in the literature. The underlying mechanism relies on the relationship between the distribution of wealth and the share of credit constrained agents. We examine the role of households’ balance sheet compositions regarding asset liquidity and find that when calibrating the model to match liquid wealth, the relationship between wealth inequality and fiscal multipliers is much stronger.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Fiscal Consolidation, Wealth Inequality, Fiscal Multipliers, Consumption Smoothing Hypothesis
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E21 - Consumption ; Saving ; Wealth; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook > E62 - Fiscal Policy; H - Public Economics > H3 - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents > H31 - Household; H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H63 - Debt ; Debt Management ; Sovereign Debt

References

Allison, P. D. (1978). Measures of inequality. American Sociological Review 43(6), 865–880.

Atkinson, A. B. and S. Morelli (2012). Chartbook of economic inequality: 25 countries 1911-2010. Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) Research Note 15.

Barro, R. J. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth? Journal of Political Economy 82(6), 1095–1117.

Basso, H. S. and O. Rachedi (2018). The young, the old, and the government: demographics and fiscal multipliers. Banco de Espana Working Paper.

Benabou, R. (2002). Tax and education policy in a heterogeneous agent economy: What levels of redistribution maximize growth and efficiency? Econometrica 70, 481–517.

Blanchard, O. and R. Perotti (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 117(4), 1329– 1368.

Blanchard, O. J. and D. Leigh (2013). Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. American Economic Review 103(3), 117–20.

Brinca, P., M. Faria-e Castro, M. H. Ferreira, and H. A. Holter (2019). The nonlinear effects of fiscal policy. Working Paper.

Brinca, P., H. A. Holter, M. H. Ferreira, F. Franco, and L. Malafry (2017). Fiscal consolidation programs and income inequality. ADEMU Working Paper Series (078).

Brinca, P., H. A. Holter, P. Krusell, and L. Malafry (2016). Fiscal multipliers in the 21st century. Journal of Monetary Economics 77, 53–69.

Carroll, C., J. Slacalek, K. Tokuoka, and M. N. White (2017). The distribution of wealth and the marginal propensity to consume. Quantitative Economics 8(3), 977–1020.

Domeij, D. and M. Floden (2006). The labor-supply elasticity and borrowing constraints: Why estimates are biased. Review of Economic dynamics 9(2), 242–262.

Grant, C. (2007). Estimating credit constraints among u.s. households. Oxford Economic Papers 59(4), 583–605.

Guner, N., M. Lopez-Daneri, and G. Ventura (2014). Heterogeneity and government revenues: Higher taxes at the top? Working Paper.

Heathcote, J., K. Storesletten, and G. L. Violante (2017). Optimal tax progressivity: An analytical framework. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 132(4), 1693–1754.

Holter, H., D. Krueger, and S. Stepanchuk (2017). How do tax progressivity and household heterogeneity affect laffer curves. Working paper.

Kaplan, G. and G. L. Violante (2014). A model of the consumption response to fiscal stimulus payments. Econometrica 82(4), 1199–11239.

Kaplan, G., G. L. Violante, and J. Weidner (2014). The wealthy hand-to-mouth. Brookings papers on economic activity (1), 77–153.

Krusell, P. and A. A. Smith, Jr (1998). Income and wealth heterogeneity in the macroeconomy. Journal of Political Economy 106(5), 867–896.

Leigh, A. (2007). How closely do top income shares track other measures of inequality? The Economic Journal 117(524), F619–F633.

OECD (2015). In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Harvard University Press.

Ramey, V. A. (2011). Can government purchases stimulate the economy? Journal of Economic Literature 49(3), 673–85.

Reichling, F. and C. Whalen (2012). Review of estimates of the frisch elasticity of labor supply. Working Paper Congressional Budget Office.

Röhrs, S. and C. Winter (2017). Reducing government debt in the presence of inequality. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 82, 1–20.

Trabandt, M. and H. Uhlig (2012). How do laffer curves differ across countries? National Bureau of Economic Research.