The impact of civil society and governance on poverty: Are there differences between the North and East Africa region?

Aloui, Zouhaier (2019): The impact of civil society and governance on poverty: Are there differences between the North and East Africa region?

Abstract

This article attempts to study the impact of civil society and governance on poverty. In this work, we have tried to answer the following questions: what is the effect of civil society and governance on poverty in the region of North and East Africa? In this framework, the basic assumption was the existence of a direct and indirect effect of civil society and the quality of governance in reducing poverty. The study of this hypothesis was formulated in a static model applied to data available on the region of North and East Africa between 1996-2016. The results of our regressions show that civil society, has a positive effect in reducing poverty in East Africa, but negative in North Africa and the political and legal indicators, has a positive effect on poverty in the East African countries and administrative indicators, has a positive effect in North Africa. This result implies that civil society and governance quality factors play an important role in reducing poverty in East Africa as North Africa. The relationship between civil society, governance and poverty varies according to the stage of development. But notes significant differences between the region of North Africa and East. This supports our contention that civil society and governance has more impact on poverty in the East African region, the poorest than in the rich region of North Africa. For example, the relationship between civil society and poverty is positive and significant for East Africa, is negative and significant in North Africa. The relationship between governance (policy and legal indicators) and poverty is positive and significant for East Africa, but in North Africa only administrative indicators have a positive effect on poverty. This supports our claim that governance has more impact on poverty than civil society.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: civil society, governance, poverty, Regional Economic Integration, North Africa, East Africa.
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H55 - Social Security and Public Pensions; H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H75 - State and Local Government: Health ; Education ; Welfare ; Public Pensions; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I32 - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty

References

Amprou, J., et Chauvet, L., (2004). « Efficacité et allocation de l’aide : revue des débats », Agence Francaise de Développement

Benson B. L., (1981). « A note on Corruption by Public Officials: The Black Market for Property Rights », Journal of Libertarian Studies, 5: 305-309.

Bruno, M., Ravallion, M. and Squire, L (1998). « Equity and Growth in Developing Countries: Old and New Perspectives on the Policy Issues. In Income Distribution and High-Quality Growth», Tanzi, V and Chu, KY, eds, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Exchange 36: 2.

Dollar, D., et Kraay, A., (2002). «Growth is Good for the Poor », Journal of Economic Growth 7(3): 195-225.

Gelb, A., Knight, J. B et Sabot, R. H (1991). «Public sector employment, rent seeking, and economic growth », Economic Journal, 101 (Sept.), pp 1186-1189.

Grindle, S., (2004). «Good Enough Governance: Poverty Reduction and Reform in Developing Countries», Version of Record online: 25 AUG 2004, volume 17.

Knack, S., et Keefer, P., (1995). «Institution and Economics performance: Cross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutionals Measures», Economics and Politics, Vol. 7(3), pp.207-227.

Kofi, A., (1998). «Démocratie et gouvernance mondiale : quelles régulations pour le XXIe siècle ? », Lindesmith Center 1998a

Lal, D., et Myint, H., (1996), « The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity and Growth-A Comparative Study », Clarendon Press, Oxford.

Landell-Mills, P., et Serageldin, I., (1991), « Governance and the External Factor », in Proceedings of the World Bank Annual Conference on Development Economics, 1991. Washington, D.C. World Bank.

Nations Unies (2000), Les OMD- Objectifs du Millénaire pour le développement (OMD)- ONU. Siège de l’Organistion à New York.

North, D. C., (1990). « Institutions, Institutional Change et Economic Performance», New York, Cambridge Univerity Press.

PNBG., (2002). « Programme National de Bonne Gouvernance du Sénégal », Par Gouvernement du Sénégal 84 pages.

Ravallion, M., (2001). « Growth, Inequality and Poverty: Looking Beyond Averages », World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29 (11), pages 1803-1815, Novembre.

Robinson, J.A., Torvik, R et verdier, T. (2006), « Political foundations of the resources curse », Journal of Development Economics, 79: 447-468.

Sen, A., (1998). «The Possibility of Social Choice», Nobel Lecture, Decembre 8, 1998.

Sen, A., (1999). «Development as Freedom », Alferd Knopf. Lnc, trad. Fr., Un nouveau modèle économique. Développement, justice et liberté, Odile Jacob, Paris, 2000.

UNDP., (1997). «Governance for Sustainable Human Development: A UNDP Policy Document», New York, PNUD. 1997.

UNDP., (2010). «Rapport sur le développement dans le monde», New York : Publication des Nations unies.