Public Debt and Economic Growth nexus: A Dynamic Panel ARDL approach

Attard, Juergen (2019): Public Debt and Economic Growth nexus: A Dynamic Panel ARDL approach.

Abstract

The impact of public debt on economic growth has been a pertinent topic over the last decade following the financial and global economic crisis. This empirical study examines the debt and growth nexus for a panel of 25 European Union member states over the 1996-2017 period. A panel autoregressive distributed lag model (ARDL) is used to analyse the impact of debt on growth. This framework helps in determining both the long and short-run impact of debt on growth. This mitigates some limitations of previous empirical literature that explains either the short- or long-run effect. The full panel ARDL estimation illustrates a negative relationship between debt and growth both over the long and short-term. The debt and growth nexus, although of different magnitudes, is also negative across high and low levels of debt and across different time periods. Finally, a Dumitrescu Hurlin panel causality test is carried out to establish the causal direction between debt and growth. Evidence of bidirectional causality is detected for the full panel of countries. However, the direction of causality varies between countries with high and low average debt-to-GDP ratio.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Public Debt, Economic Growth, Panel ARDL, Causality, European Union
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt > H63 - Debt ; Debt Management ; Sovereign Debt

References

Abbas, S. A., & Christensen, J. E. (2010). The role of domestic debt markets in economic growth: An empirical investigation for low-income countries and emerging markets. IMF Staff Papers, 57(1), 209–255.

Aizenman,J.,Kletzer,K.,&Pinto,B. (2007). Economic growth with constraints on tax revenues and public debt: implications for fiscal policy and cross-country differences (Tech. Rep.). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Baldacci, E., Clements, B., Gupta, S., & Cui, Q. (2008). Social spending, human capital, and growth in developing countries. World development, 36(8), 1317–1341.

Barro, R. J. (1989). The ricardian approach to budget deficits. Journal of Economic perspectives, 3(2), 37–54.

Baum,A.,Checherita-Westphal,C.,&Rother,P. (2013). Debt and growth: New evidence for the euro area. Journal of International Money and Finance, 32, 809–821.

Becker, G. S. (2007). Health as human capital: synthesis and extensions. Oxford Economic Papers, 59(3), 379–410.

Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Moore, M. (2004). The effect of improvements in health and longevity on optimal retirement and saving (Tech. Rep.). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2001). The effect of health on economic growth: theory and evidence (Tech. Rep.). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Cecchetti, S. G., Mohanty, M. S., & Zampolli, F. (2011). The real effects of debt.

Checherita-Westphal, C., & Rother, P. (2012). The impact of high government debt on economic growth and its channels: An empirical investigation for the euro area. European economic review, 56(7), 1392–1405.

Cochrane, J. H. (2011). Understanding policy in the great recession: Some unpleasant fiscal arithmetic. European Economic Review, 55(1), 2–30.

DeLong, J. B., Summers, L. H., Feldstein, M., & Ramey, V. A. (2012). Fiscal policy in a depressed economy [with comments and discussion]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 233–297.

De Vita, G., Trachanas, E., & Luo, Y. (2018). Revisiting the bi-directional causality between debt and growth: Evidence from linear and nonlinear tests. Journal of International Money and Finance, 83, 55–74.

Diamond, P. A. (1965). National debt in a neoclassical growth model. The American Economic Review, 55(5), 1126–1150.

Di Sanzo, S., & Bella, M. (2015). Public debt and growth in the euro area: evidence from parametric and nonparametric granger causality. The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 15(2), 631–648.

Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460.

Eberhardt,M.,&Presbitero,A.F. (2015). Public debt and growth: Heterogeneity and non-linearity. Journal of International Economics, 97(1), 45–58.

Égert, B. (2015). The 90% public debt threshold: the rise and fall of a stylized fact. Applied Economics, 47(34-35), 3756–3770.

Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 251–276.

Ferreira, M. C. (2009). Public debt and economic growth: a granger causality panel data approach.

Ghosh, A. R., Kim, J. I., Mendoza, E. G., Ostry, J. D., & Qureshi, M. S. (2013). Fiscal fatigue, fiscal space and debt sustainability in advanced economies. The Economic Journal, 123(566), F4–F30.

Gómez-Puig, M., & Sosvilla-Rivero, S. (2015). The causal relationship between debt and growth in emu countries. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(6), 974–989.

Herndon, T., Ash, M., & Pollin, R. (2014). Does high public debt consistently stifle economic growth? a critique of reinhart and rogoff. Cambridge journal of economics, 38(2), 257–279.

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.

Irons,J.,& Bivens,J. (2010). Government debt and economic growth overreaching claims of debt“threshold” suffer from theoretical and empirical flaws.

Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of econometrics, 90(1), 1–44.

Kelley,A.C.,&Schmidt,R.M. (2005). Evolution of recent economic-demographic modeling: Asynthesis. Journal of Population Economics, 18(2), 275–300.

Krugman, P. (1988). Financing vs. forgiving a debt overhang. Journal of development Economics, 29(3), 253–268.

Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & Chu, C.-S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1–24.

Lindh, T., & Malmberg, B. (2007). Demographically based global income forecasts up to the year 2050. International Journal of Forecasting, 23(4), 553–567.

Lof, M., & Malinen, T. (2014). Does sovereign debt weaken economic growth? a panel var analysis. Economics Letters, 122(3), 403–407.

Lorentzen, P., McMillan, J., & Wacziarg, R. (2008). Death and development. Journal of economic growth, 13(2), 81–124.

Lucas Jr, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of monetary economics, 22(1), 3–42.

Mankiw, N. G., Romer, D., & Weil, D. N. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 107(2), 407–437.

Mhlaba, N., & Phiri, A. (2019). Is public debt harmful towards economic growth? new evidence from south africa. Cogent Economics & Finance, 7(1), 1603653.

Modigliani, F. (1961). Long-run implications of alternative fiscal policies and the burden of the national debt. The Economic Journal, 71(284), 730–755.

Mosikari, T. J., & Eita, J. H. (2017). Empirical test of the ricardian equivalence in the kingdom of lesotho. Cogent Economics & Finance, 5(1), 1351674.

Moss, T. J., & Chiang, H. S. (2003). The other costs of high debt in poor countries: Growth, policy dynamics, and institutions.

Nguyen, T. Q., Clements, M. B. J., & Bhattacharya, M. R. (2003). External debt, public investment, and growth in low-income countries (No. 3-249). International Monetary Fund.

Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 61(S1), 653–670.

Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the ppp hypothesis. Econometric theory, 20(3), 597–625.

Pegkas, P. (2018). The effect of government debt and other determinants on economic growth: The greek experience. Economies, 6(1), 10.

Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels.

Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of applied econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.

Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (1998). An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econometric Society Monographs, 31, 371–413.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of applied econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1997). Pooled estimation of long-run relationships in dynamic heterogenous panels. DAE working papers amalgamated Series, 9721.

Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634.

Pescatori, A., Sandri, D., & Simon, J. (2014). Debt and growth: is there a magic threshold? (No. 14-34). International Monetary Fund.

Reinhart, C. M., Reinhart, V. R., & Rogoff, K. S. (2012). Debt overhangs: Past and present (Tech. Rep.). National Bureau of Economic Research.

Reinhart, C. M., & Rogoff, K. S. (2010). Growth in a time of debt. American economic review, 100(2), 573–78. Saint-Paul,G. (1992). Fiscal policy in an endogenous growth model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(4), 1243–1259.

Schclarek, A., et al. (2004). Debt and economic growth in developing and industrial countries. Lund University Department of Economics Working Paper, 2005, 34.

Solow,R.M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The quarterly journal of economics, 70(1), 65–94.

Van, V. B., & Sudhipongpracha, T. (2015). Exploring government budget deficit and economic growth: Evidence from vietnam’s economic miracle. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 42(3), 127–148.

Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and statistics, 69(6), 709–748.

Woo, J., & Kumar, M. S. (2015). Public debt and growth. Economica, 82(328), 70