Ivanova, Daniela (2018): Сертификацията – инструмент за „зелени“ комуникации в глобалната търговия. Published in: (2018)
PDF
MPRA_paper_96038.pdf Download (364kB) |
Abstract
Recent decades have witnessed a huge leap in the development of industrialization and increased consumption. This, of course, makes economic activities related to the use of more resources and the generation of growing quantities of waste, responsible to a great extent for environmental degradation. In order to reduce the negative impact, a change is needed which requires the involvement of all stakeholders - consumers, businesses and government institutions. This can be achieved when each participant in the chain assumes their responsibility for their actions. Producers - by reducing consumption of resources and by producing in an environmentally friendly manner. Consumers – by consuming responsibly, taking into account the impact of the products and services used on nature. The state - by creating conditions and stimulating the implementation of sustainable production and consumption patterns. An important point in this change is the communication between the different stakeholders. Certification systems can successfully fulfil the role of a tool giving information about the implementation of appropriate sustainable practices and thus suppress information asymmetry in the market. The said so far also defines the main aim of the monograph, namely to present the possibilities of certification schemes as a tool for providing information to stakeholders about the implementation of sustainable practices in Bulgaria. In order to identify the opportunities of certification to provide specific information, the business motivation for applying sustainable practices and consumer perceptions and attitudes towards such practices were analysed in the monograph. The evaluation in the course of the study will prove the hypothesis that certification schemes are an appropriate information tool for “green” communication with stakeholders in global trade. In the first chapter of the monograph, the theoretical foundations of certification, the chronology of development and its role in suppressing information asymmetry are clarified. The different types of certification schemes are classified and the parties interested in certification activities are identified. The second chapter, dedicated to business-to-consumer certification schemes, analyses product certification. The “green” certification schemes are summarized, with particular attention to quality labelling, the environmental and social/ethical labelling. A comparative analysis of European and Bulgarian practices for recognising "green" certification schemes of the type "business-to-consumer" is made. The results of a conducted empirical study of the awareness and attitudes of Bulgarian users towards “green” independent third-party certification schemes show that a very limited number of such schemes are recognisable. Consumers need more information about labelling, production and processing methods, standards, certification schemes and controls. The existence of information asymmetry, in turn, impedes the development of market for products with ecological and ethical characteristics in the country. The limited market penetration of organic products, combined with the low awareness of Bulgarian consumers, opens the door to the emergence of unregulated eco-labels and creates the potential for further confusion and lack of trust among consumers. Chapter three discusses business-to-business certification schemes. The certification of management systems related to quality, safety, etc. is analysed. The motives and benefits of implementing similar certification schemes related to environmental protection in the world are explored. The results of a conducted empirical study of companies in Bulgaria with an implemented and certified environmental impact management system show that the implementation of “green” certification schemes brings tangible and real benefits to businesses - both in terms of environmental protection and improvement of the social and economic performance of the company and better compliance with the existing legislation in the field. The comparison of the motives and the results of the implementation of the Environmental Impact Management Systems revealed that the expectations and benefits coincide to a large extent, which also implies a high degree of satisfaction with the implementation of these schemes. The last fourth chapter analyses the weaknesses and shortcomings of “green” certification schemes. It summarizes their benefits and advantages as a tool for communication among stakeholders. In the course of the study, it was demonstrated that the additional signals from certification schemes for implementation of sustainable practices facilitate transactions between actors in the supply chain and are a reliable source of consumer information. Certification, in order to fulfil its role as an information tool for the implementation of sustainable “green” practices, must be independent and objective. Adherence to these principles requires continuous analysis of the impact of the market structure on ensuring the reliability of certification services. The monograph is focused on “green” certification, whose impact on stakeholders has not yet been sufficiently studied in our country. The published research represents the first of its kind analyses in this field and offers an answer to the questions whether Bulgarian consumers and businesses are aware of “green” certification schemes, whether they look for them on the market and how they are affected.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Сертификацията – инструмент за „зелени“ комуникации в глобалната търговия |
English Title: | Certification - a tool for “green” communications in global trade |
Language: | Bulgarian |
Keywords: | certification, “green” certification schemes, tool for “green”communication |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 96038 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Daniela Ivanova |
Date Deposited: | 18 Sep 2019 06:06 |
Last Modified: | 05 Oct 2019 09:35 |
References: | Akerlof, G. (1970) The Market for "Lemons": Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 3, 488-500. Albersmeier, F., H. Schulze, G. Jahn, A. Spiller (2009) The Reliability of Third‐Party Certification in the Food Chain: From Checklists to Risk Oriented Auditing, Food Control, 20 (10), 927‐935. Amstel van Saane, M., P. Driessen, P. Glasbergen (2008) Eco-labelling and Information Asymmetry: a Comparison of Five Eco-labels in the Netherlands, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (3), 263-276. Anders, S., D. Monteiro, E. Rouviere (2007) Objectiveness in the Market for Third-Party Certification: Does market structure matter?, 105th EAAE Seminar ‘International Marketing and International Trade of Quality Food Products’, Bologna, Italy, March 8-10, 2007. Andrews, R., N. Darnall, D. Gallagher, J. Villani (1998) Environmental regulation and business Self-Regulation: The effects of ISO 14001 environmental management systems on the environmental and economic performance of businesses, Policy Sciences, 31 (3), 177-197. Andrews, R., N. Darnall, D. Gallagher, S. Keiner, E. Feldman, M. Mitchell (2001) Environmental management systems: history, theory, and implementation research. In: NDEMS. Arimura, T., A. Hibiki, H. Katayama (2005) Is a voluntary approach an effective environmental policy instrument? - A case of environmental management systems, Paper Presented to 32nd Kobe University Environmental Economics Workshop, 22 Aug, Kobe. Bansal, P., W. Bogner (2002) Deciding on ISO 14001: economics, institutions, and context, Long Range Planning, 35 (3), 269–290. Bansal, P., T. Hunter (2003) Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001, Journal of Business Ethics, 46 (3), 289–299. Bansal, P., K. Roth (2000) Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness, The Academy of Management Journal, 43 (4), 717-736. Barrett, H., A. Browne, P. Harris, K. Cadoret (2002) Organic certification and the UK market: Organic imports from developing countries, Food Policy, 27 (4), 301-318. Basu, A., N. Chau, U. Grote (2003) Eco-Labels and Stages of Development, Review of Development Economics, 7(2), 228-247. Berglung, C., S. Matti (2006) Citizen and consumer: the dual role of individuals in environmental policy, Environmental Politics, 15 (4), 550-571. Blackman, A. (2008) Can voluntary environmental regulation work in developing countries? Lessons from case studies, Policy Studies Journal, 36 (1), 119–141. Blackman, А., С. Guerrero (2012) What drives voluntary eco-certification in Mexico?’. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40 (2), 256–268. Boer, J. (2003) Sustainability Labelling Schemes: the Logic of Their Claims and Their Functions for Stakeholders, Business Strategy and the Environment, 12 (4), 254 – 264. Boiral, O., H. Jean-François (2012) Modelling the impact of ISO 14001 on environmental performance: A comparative approach, Journal of Environmental Management, 99, 84 – 97. Boutrif, E. (2003) The new role of Codex Alimentarius in the context of WTO/SPS agreement, Food Control, 14 (2), 81-88. Brewer, G., P. Stern (2005) Decision Making for the Environment: Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change (HDGC), Center for Economic, Governance, and International Studies (CEGIS), Washington. Caswell, J. (1998) How Labelling of Safety and Process Attributes Affects Markets for Food, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, October 1998, 15-158. Caswell, J., M. Bredahl, N. Hooker (1998) How Quality Management Metasystems Are Affecting the Food Industry, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 20 (2), 547–557. Catherine, D., J. Humphrey (2000) Governance and trade in fresh vegetables: The impact of UK supermarkets on the African horticulture industry, Journal of Development Studies, 37 (3), 76-147. Christmann, P., G. Taylor (2001) Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm self-regulation in China’. Journal of International Business Studies, 32 (3), 439–458. CielaNet website [Online] Available at: http://web6.ciela.net [04.08.2014]. Council of the European Union (2009) Procedural issues and consultation of interested parties, 10359/09 ADD 5 AGRI 238, 22 June 2009, Brussels. Curkovic, S., R. Sroufe, S. Melnyk (2005) Identifying the factors which affect the decision to attain ISO 14000, Energy, 30 (8), 1387–1407. Dankers, C. (2003) Environmental and Social Standards, Certification and Labelling for Cash Crops, Raw Materials, Tropical and Horticultural Products Service (ESCR) Commodities and Trade Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Dankers, C. (2007) Private standards in the United States and European Union markets for fruit and vegetables: Implications for developing countries. 3rd ed. New York: Food & Agriculture Org. Darby, M., E. Karni (1973) Free Competition and the Optimal Amount of Fraud, Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 67–88. Delmas, M., L. Grant (2010) Eco-labeling Strategies and Price-Premium: The Wine Industry Puzzle, Institute of Environment and Sustainability, http://www.environment.ucla.edu. Delmas, M., N. Lessem (2012) Eco‐Premium or Eco‐Penalty? Eco‐labels and quality in the organic wine marke, Institute of Environment and Sustainability, http://www.environment.ucla.edu. Dietz, T. & P. Stern (2002) Exploring New Tools for Environmental Protection, in T. Dietz, & P. Stern (Eds.) New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, information and Voluntary Measures, National Academies Press. D'Souza, C., M. Taghian, P. Lamb., R. Peretiatko (2007) Green Decisions: Demographics and Consumer Understanding of Environmental Labels, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31 (4), 371-376. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 14 (10), 1633‐1636. doi: 10.3201/eid1410.071341. Eurobarometer (2007) Eurobarometer 295 (November-December 2007) [Online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion [26.02.2018]. Eurobarometer (2011) Special Special Eurobarometer 365 (April-May 2011) [Online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion [26.02.2018]. Eurobarometer (2014) Special Eurobarometer 416 (April-May 2014) [Online] Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion [26.02.2018]. Eurobarometer (2017) Special Eurobarometer 468 Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment [Online] Available at: https://data.europa.eu/euodp/data/dataset/S2156_88_1_468_ENG [26.02.2018]. European Commission (2018) EU Ecolabel [Online] Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/ [Отваряно на 08.02.2018]. European Communities (2005) DG JRC/IPTS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE/Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (Seville), Food supply chain dynamics and quality certification, Review report. European Communities (2006a) DG JRC/IPTS DIRECTORATE-GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE/Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (Seville), Economics of Food Quality Assurance and Certification Schemes Managed within an Integrated Supply Chain, FINAL REPORT. European Communities (2006b) Food Quality Assurance and Certification Scheme. Stakeholder Hearing – Background Paper, European Community, 11-12 May 2006. European Parliament and the Council (2012) Regulation (EU) № 1151/2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs, OJ L 343, 14.12.2012. Frey, B., A. Stutzer (2006) Environmental Morale and Motivation. in Alan Lewis (Editors), The Cambridge Handbook of Psychology and Economic Behavior, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. Fryxell, G., W. Lo, S. Chung (2004) Influence of motivations for seeking ISO 14001 certification on perceptions of EMS effectiveness in China, Environmental Management, 33 (2), 239–251. Fulponi, L. (2006) Private voluntary standards in the food system: The perspective of major food retailers in OECD countries, Food Policy, 31, 1‐13. Gavronski, I., Ferrer, G., Paiva, E. (2008) ISO 14001 certification in Brazil: motivations and benefits, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (1), 87-94. Gernuks, M., J. Buchgeister, L. Schebek (2007) Assessment of environmental aspects and determination of environmental targets within environmental management systems (EMS) e development of a procedure for Volkswagen, Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 (11-12), 1063-1075. Golan E., F. Kuchler, L. Mitchell (2001) Economics of Food Labeling, Journal of Consumer Policy, 24, 117–184. Harizanova, H. (2015) Implementation of ISO 14001 in Bulgaria’. Scientific Papers Series Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development, 15 (1). Hatanaka, M., C. Bain, B. Lawrence (2005) Third-party certification in the global agriFood system, Food policy, 30 (3), 354-369. Hatanaka, M., L. Busch (2008) Third‐Party Certification in the Global Agrifood System: An Objective or Socially Mediated Governance Mechanism? Sociologia Ruralis, 48 (1), 73‐91. Havinga, T. (2008) Retail driven Food safety regulation. In Food safety, market organization, trade and development, 1st ed. Geneva: Springer International Publishing. Henderson R. (2015) Making the Business Case for Environmental Sustainability, Harvard Environmental Economics Program [Online] Available: http://heep.hks.harvard.edu/files/heep/files/dp64_henderson.pdf?m=1434644814 [21.01.2018]. Henson, S. (2008) The role of public and private standards in regulating international Food markets, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, 4 (1), 63-81. Henson, S., J. Northen (1998) Economic Determinants of Food Safety Controls in Supply of Retailer Own-Brand, Agribusiness, 14 (2), 113-126. Henson, S., J. Humphrey (2009) The impacts of private Food safety standards on the Food chain and on public standard-setting processes, Rome: Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Codex Alimentarius Commission, Thirty-second Session, FAO Headquarters. Hibiki, A., Higashi, M., Matsuda, A. (2004) ‘Determinants of adoption of ISO 14001 by a Japanese publicly-held manufacture and the market valuation of a certified firm’. Proceedings of European Association of Environmental and Resource Economics. CD. Hilts, C., L. Pelletier (2009) Occurrence of Melamine in Foods and Feed, Prepared for the WHO Expert Meeting on Toxicological and Health Aspects of Melamine and Cyanuric Acid, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada. Holleran, E., M. Bredahl, L. Zaibet (1999) Private incentives for adopting food safety and quality assurance, Food Policy, 24, 669‐683. Hopkins, M. (2009) 8 reasons sustainability will change management (that you never thought of), MIT Sloan Management Review, 51 (1), 26-30. Horne, R. (2009) Limits to Labels: The Role of Eco-labels in the Assessment of Product Sustainability and Routes to Sustainable Consumption, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33 (2), 175-182. Hozik, М. (2016) Making the Green by Going Green: Increased Demand for Green Products and the FTC’s Role in a Greener Future. [Online] Available: https://gelr.org/2016/02/01/making-the-green-by-going-green-increased-demand-for-green-products-and-the-ftcs-role-in-a-greener-future-georgetown-environmental-law-review/#_ftn1 [14.02.2018]. Ippolito, P. (1990) Bonding and nonbonding signals of product quality. Journal of Business, 63, 41–60. ISO/IEC Guide 23:1982 Methods of indicating conformity with standards for third-party certification systems ISO (2014) The ISO Survey of Management System Standard Certification (1999 – 2014) [Online] Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso-survey [Accessed: 10.09.2015]. ISO (2015) The ISO Survey of Management System Standard Certification (2000 – 2015) [Online] Available from: http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_14001_iso_survey2015.xls [Accessed: 19.07.2016]. Jahn, G., M. Schramm, A. Spiller (2005) The Reliability of Certification: Quality Labels as a Consumer Policy Tool, Journal of Consumer Policy, 28, 53-73. Jahn G., M. Schramm, A. Spiller (2004) Trust in Certification Procedures: An Institutional Economics Approach Investigating the Quality of Audits within Food Chains,14th Annual World Food and Agribusiness Forum, Symposium and Case Conference, Montreux, Switzerland, June 2004. Johnstonea, N., J. Labonne (2009) Why do manufacturing facilities introduce environmental management systems? Improving and/or signaling performance, Ecological economics, 68, 719–730. Lawrence, L., D.Andrews, B. Ralph, C. France (2002) Identifying and assessing environmental impacts: investigating ISO 14001 approaches, TQM Magazine, 14 (1), 43-50. Link, S., E. Naveh (2006) Standardization and discretion: does the environmental standard ISO 14001 lead to performance benefits? Engineering Management, IEEE. 53 (4), 508-519. Liu, P. (2009) Private standards in international trade: issues, opportunities and long-term prospects. The evolving structure of world agricultural trade, FAO, Rome, Italy, 201-205. Lizzeri, A. (1999) Information Revelation and Certification Intermediaries, The RAND Journal of Economics, 30 (2), 214-231. Luning P., W. Marcelis, W. Jongen (2002) Food quality management: A techno-managerial approach. Wageningen: Wageningen Press. Lyon, T., J. Maxwell (1999) Voluntary approaches to environmental regulation: a survey. Kelley School of Business. Indiana University. Bloomington IN 47405-1701. Manning, L., R. Baines (2004) Effective management of food safety and quality, British Food Journal, 106 (8/9), 598-606. Martín-Peña, M., E. Díaz-Garrido, J. Sánchez-López, (2014) Analysis of benefits and difficulties associated with firms. Environmental Management Systems: the case of the Spanish automotive industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 70, 220-230. Massoud, M., R. Fayad, M. El-Fadel, R. Kamleh (2009) Drivers, barriers and incentives to implementing environmental management systems in the food industry: A case of Lebanon, Journal of Cleaner Production, 18 (3), 200–209. McCluskey, J. (2000) A game theoretic approach to organic foods: An analysis of asymmetric information and policy. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 29, 1–9. McCluskey, J. (2007) Public and private Food quality standards: Recent trends and strategic incentives. 1st ed. Cambridge: CABI. McGuire, W. (2014) The effect of ISO 14001 on environmental regulatory compliance in China, Ecological Economics, 105, 254–264. Melser, D., P. Robertson (2003) Eco-Labelling, Trade and the GM Food Debate, Discussion Paper 2003/13, School of Economics, University of New South Wales. Meuwissen M., A. Velthuis, H. Hogeveen, R. Huirne (2003) Technical and economic considerations about traceability and certification in livestock production chains. In: A. Velthuis, L. Unnevehr, H. Hogeveen, R. Huirne (Eds.), New approaches to food safety economics, 41–54. Wageningen: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Morrow, D., D. Rondinelli (2002) Adopting corporate environmental management systems: motivations and results of ISO 14001 and EMAS Certification, European Management Journal, 20 (2), 159–171. Nakamura, M., T. Takahashi, I. Vertinsky (2001) Why Japanese firms choose to certify: a study of manage-rial responses to environmental issues, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42 (1), 23–52. Nelson, P. (1970) Information and Consumer Behaviour, Journal of Political Economy, 78, 311-329. Neumayer, E., R. Perkins (2004) What explains the uneven take-up of ISO 14001 at the global level?–A Panel-Data Analysis. Environment and Planning,. 36 (5), 823–839. Nilsson H., B. Tuncer, A. Thidell (2004) The Use of Eco-labelling like Initiatives on Food Products to Promote Quality Assurance - is There Enough Credibility?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 12, 517–526. Nishitani, K. (2009) An empirical study of the initial adoption of ISO 14001 in Japanese manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 68 (3), 669–679. Nishitani, K. (2010) Demand for ISO 14001 adoption in the global supply chain: An empirical analysis focusing on environmentally conscious markets, Resource and Energy Economics, 32 (3), 395–407. Nunes, B., D. Bennet (2010) Green operations initiatives in the automotive industry, Benchmarking: An International Journal, 17 (3), 396-420. OCDE (2002a) Report of the OECD workshop on information and consumer decision-making for sustainable consumption, Working Party on National Environmental Policy, ENV/EPOC/WPNEP(2001)16/FINAL. OCDE (2002b) Towards Sustainable Household Consumption? Trends and Policies in OECD Countries. Paris. OECD (2005) Effects of Eco-labelling Schemes: Compilation of Recent Studies. Joint Working Party on Trade and Environment, COM/ENV/TD(2004)34/FINAL. Oliveira, О., J. Serra, M. Salgado (2010) Does ISO 14001 work in Brazil? Journal of Cleaner Production, 18 (18), 1797-1806. Orriss, G., A. Whitehead (2000) Hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) as a part of an overall quality assurance system in international Food trade, Food control, 11 (5), 345-351. Peicheva, M., A. Kraeva-Miteva, H. Harizanova (2017) Study of social audit and standards for social and environmental responsibility – Case study of Bulgaria, Economic Alternatives, 3, 449-474. Prajogo, D., A. Tang, K. Lai (2012) Do firms get what they want from ISO 14001 adoption?: An Australian perspective, Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 117-126. Proto, M., S. Supino (2006) Eco-labelling: uno strumento per la tutela dei consumatori?, 22nd National of Congress of Commodity Science, Rome, March 2 – 4, 2006 . QS scheme (2017) At a glance: Information about the QS scheme - Strong Partners.From Farm to Shop [Online] Available at: https://www.q-s.de/press-and-newsroom/information-about-the-qs-scheme.html [08.03.2018]. Rischkowsky, F., T. Döring (2008) Consumer Policy in a Market Economy: Considerations from the Perspective of the Economics of Information, the New Institutional Economics as well as Behavioural Economics, J Consum Policy, 31, 285–313. Roosen, J., J. Lusk, J. Fox (2003) Consumer demand for and attitudes toward alternative beef labeling strategies in France, Germany, and the UK, Agribusiness, 19, 77–90. Round, D., J. Tustin (2005) Consumer as international traders: Some economic and legal issues underlying consumer protection, Competition & Consumer Low Journal, 12, 249-274. Rubik, F., P. Frankl (2005) The Future of Eco-labelling. Making Environmental Product Information Systems Effective, Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing Ltd. Solano, V. (2006) Food Safety and Social Capital: A Double Side Connection. Paper presented at the Discussion forum “System dynamics and food network research”, Queensland, Australia, August 17, 2006. Soon, J. (2013) Public and Private Food Safety Standards: Facilitating or Frustrating Fresh Produce Growers? Laws, 2 (1), 1-19. Spinach‐associated Escherichia coli O157:H7 Outbreak, Utah and New Mexico, 2006. Stern, P. (1999) Information, Incentives, and Proenvironmental Consumer Behavior, Journal of Consumer Policy, 22, 461 – 478. Stigler, G. (1961) The Economics of Information, Journal of Political Economy, LXIX,, 213–225. Stiglitz, J. (2000) The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, November, 1441-1478. Tan, L. (2005) Implementing ISO 14001: is it beneficial for firms in newly industrialized Malaysia?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 13 (4), 397-404. Tanner, B. (2000) Independent assessment by third-party certification bodies. Food Control, 11, 415-417. The Nielsen Company (2015) Green Generation: Millennials Say Sustainability is a Shopping Priority. The Nielsen Company [Online] Available at: http://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/news/2015/green-generation-millennials-say-sustainability-is-a-shopping-priority.html [26.02.2018]. Theuvsen, L., A. Spiller (2007) Perspectives of quality management in modern agribusiness. In: L. Theuvsen, A. Spiller, M. Peupert, G. Jahn, (Eds.): Quality Management in Food Chains, Wageningen: 13‐19. Tietzel, M., M. Weber (1991) Von Betrugern, Blendern und Opportunisten. Zeitschrift fur Wirtschaftspolitik, 40, 109–137. Tirole, J. (1986) Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organisations, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 2 (2), 181-214. Torgler, B., M. Garcia-Valinãs (2007) The determinants of individuals Attitudes Towards Preventing Environmental Damage. Ecological Economics, 63, 536-552. Vandermerwe S., M. Oliff (1990) Customers drive corporations, Long Range Planning, 23 (6), 10-16. Vetter, H., K. Karantininis (2002) Moral hazard, vertical integration, and public monitoring in credence goods, European Review of Agricultural Economics, 29 (2), 271–279. Watson, M., A. Emery (2004) Law, economics and the environment. A comparative study of environmental management systems, Managerial Auditing Journal, 19 (6), 760-773. Welch, E., Y. Mori, M. Aoyagi-Usui (2002) Voluntary adoption of ISO 14001 in Japan: mechanisms, stages and effects, Business Strategy and the Environment, 11 (1), 43–62. Wessells, C. (2001) Product certification and ecolabelling for fisheries sustainability, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Wu, S., P. Chu, T. Liu (2007) Determinants of a firm’s ISO 14001 certification: an empirical study of Taiwan, Pacific Economic Review, 12 (4), 467–487. Yeni, F., S. Yavaş, H. Alpas, Y. Soyer (2015) Most common Foodborne pathogens and mycotoxins on fresh produce: a review of recent outbreaks, Food Science and Nutrition, 56 (9), 1532-1544. Youssef, B., C. Abderrazak (2009) Multiplicity of eco-labels, competition, and the environment, Journal of Agricultural and Food Industrial Organization, 7, Article 7. Zanoli R., R. Scarpa, F. Napolitano, E. Piasentier, S. Naspetti, V. Bruschi (2012) Organic label as an identifier of environmentally related quality: A consumer choice experiment on beef in Italy, Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 1-10, doi:10.1017/S1742170512000026. Zemeckis R., V. Dapkutė (2007) Quality assurance schemes: the Lithuanian case, Zemės ūkio mokslai, 14, 171–177. Zeng, S., C. Tam, Z. Deng, V. Tam (2003) ISO 14000 and the construction industry: survey in China, Journal of Management in Engineering, 19(3), 107–15. Василева, Е., Д. Иванова (2011) Сертификацията на системи за управление, българските производители, Юбилейна научна конференция „Перспективи, предизвикателства пред обучението по бизнес администрация", София, 14 -15.10.2011 г. Гоев, В. (1996) Статистическа обработка, анализ на информацията от социологически, маркетингови, политически изследвания с SPSS. София. УИ „Стопанство“. ДВ (2013) Закон за прилагане на общата организация на пазарите на земеделски продукти на европейския съюз, Държавен вестник, бр. 99 от 2013 г. Манов, А., (2001) Статистика със SPSS, Тракия – М, София. Наредба № 16 от 2007 г. за подготовка и представяне на искания до Европейската комисия относно земеделските продукти и храни със защитени географски означения и традиционно специфичен характер, за контрол за съответствие с продуктовата спецификация и поддържане на база данни на производителите и контролиращите лица. Наредба № 6 от 5 май 2011 г. за специфичните изисквания при осъществяване на официален контрол върху употребата на защитени географски означения и храни с традиционно специфичен характер. НСИ (2012) Статистически годишник 2011. Сдружение „Клуб 9000“ (2016) Статистика/сертифицирани фирми [Online] Available at: http://www.club9000.org [06.08.2016] Симова, Ц. (2008) Системи за управление на околната среда – предизвикателства, преимущества за фирмите. Бюлетин „Качество“, 3, 53 – 59. Типова, Н. (2012) Сертификация на продукти и системи, Енциклопедично издание „Основни термини използвани в учебния процес“, Том I. Икономика, Издателски комплекс – УНСС, София. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/96038 |