Molintas, Dominique Trual (2012): Impact of Globalisation on the Nomadic Goatherd.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_96262.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
The story of the Mongol goatherd and the cashmere industry is a classic example of institutional overconfidence ultimately to undermine public trust. The fact that world trade manoeuvres along political undertones and historical nuances, policy exists as the interpretive and questioning touchstones to discern and reflect upon practices and outcomes. Policy seeks to create specific, deliberate futures for communities. Thus it is the crucial role of Government to determine policy intent, if not to shape the meaning and the form of societal conduct. Significance implies a degree of importance on the issue well within context of the economic, ecological and ethnic orientation of a specific region. This reasons appropriate action is due any inconsistencies or consequences that could result policy formulation. In the examination of the capabilities of the cashmere industry across its strategic priorities, policy issues such as access to financing, simulation of tax and survey results—there is no sufficient evidence to show that policy supported the nomadic goatherd in the adaptation to Globalisation. This document is a desk review for the evaluation of policy with regards to the Mongolia cashmere industry. It should be read as a compilation and synthesis of findings, rather than in conclusion of any particular line of enquiry.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Impact of Globalisation on the Nomadic Goatherd |
English Title: | Impact of Globalisation on the Nomadic Goatherd |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Mongolia, Nomadic Goatherd, Multi Fiber Agreement, Cashmere |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F62 - Macroeconomic Impacts F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F63 - Economic Development |
Item ID: | 96262 |
Depositing User: | Ms Dominique Trual Molintas |
Date Deposited: | 12 Oct 2019 04:34 |
Last Modified: | 12 Oct 2019 04:34 |
References: | Encyclopaedia Britanica. (2000). Kashmire shawl. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britanica. Research Institute of Animal Husbandry. (1999). Program for improvement of goat’s fiber quality of Mongolia. Mongolian Agricultural University. Anonymous. (1981). The challenge of cashmere. Melbourne: Australian Rural Communicators. Asian Development Bank. (2006). Bakei, A. a. (2003). Cashmere Market: processing requirements for raw cashmere. Bakei, A. a. (2003). Cashmere Market: processing requirements for raw cashmere. Bank, T. W. (2003). From goats to coats: Institutional reform in Mongolia’s cashmere sector. New York: WB. Batchimeg, M. (2005). Future challenges for the PRC and Mongolia. Beijing: Jamestown Foundation China Brief. Beddoes, Z. (2004). The Economist global agenda . New York: The Economist. Blackburn, D. (1990). A lifetime with cashmere. The Journal of the Bradford Textile Society, 49-60. Campi, A. (2001). Cashmere Industry. Seattle: Book Rags. Chimedtseren, B. (2006). Issues concerning the development of Mongolia’s cashmere processing industry. Dongyan, L. (2002). The interaction between Northeast Asian cooperation and Chinese development strategy. Ulaanbaatar : Mongolian Development Research Center. Dugeree, J. (2008, May 28). USAID-AATCC Economic Policy Reform and Competitiveness Project. (M. b. advisor, Interviewer) Encyclopedia Britannica. (2000). Cashmere. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica. Enkhbayar, S. (2002). The Mongolian livestock sector: Vital for the economy and people but vulnerable to natural phenomena. Ulaanbaatar: Mongolian Agricultural University Research Institute of Animal Husbandry. Forum, O. S. (2004). The future of nomadic pastoralism in Mongolia. London: Center for Policy Studies. Hamilton, J. (2003). Umnugovi Herders Producer Association NGO-Driven Cashmere Market Days 2003. Umnugovi: Event Assessment for the Gobi Initiative. Hamilton, J. (2003). Umnugovi Herders Producer Association NGO-Driven Cashmere Market Days 2003. Umnugovi : Event Assessment for the Gobi Initiative. Holst, P. a. (1992). Development of the Australian fibre goat industries. Recent Advances in Goat Production' Proceedings V International Conference on Goats (pp. 1554-1560). New Delhi: International Goat Association. International Wool Secretariat. (1996). Future market opportunities in wool apparel. Market Research Public Seminars. Melbourne: International Wool Secretariat. Jolly, R. (1999). UNDP Human development report. London: Oxford University Press. Kathuria, S. M. (2001). Implications of MFA abolition for India and South Asia: Policy Research Working Paper No. 2721. New York: World Bank . Martin, W. M. (2004). Dealing with diversity: Analysing the consequences of textile quota abolition. Purdue: Purdue Agricultural Economics. McGregor, B. (2000). Quality attributes of cashmere. Proceedings 10th International Wool Textile Research Conference. Aachen: DWI – Leibniz-Institut für Interaktive Materialien e.V. Mongolian Agricultural University Research Institute of Animal Husbandry. (2004). Program for Improvement of Goat’s Fiber Quality of Mongolia. Denver: Colorado State University. Mongolian Statistical Yearbook. (1997). Agriculture in Mongolia, 1971-1996: A statistical profile. Ulaanbaatar: Mongol Ulsyn Undesnii Statistikiin Gazar. Namkhai, E. (2009). Mongolian cashmere industry expert . (Wallack, Interviewer) Naumann, E. (2004). Implications of the removal of quotas in textiles and clothing trade: Brief, No 8. Cape Town: Tralac Trade Law Centre. Norwood, B. (1969). The Kennedy Round: A Try at Linear Trade Negotiations. Journal of Law and Economics 12(2), 297-319. Ripley, G. a. (1861). Cashmere. Roningen, V. (2003). The impact of a ban on Mongolia’s raw cashmere exports. Saikhanbayar, B. (2007). Methods for improving the Cashmere manufacture competitiveness. Ulaanbaatar: Government of Mongolia. Scotland Society for the Benefit of the Sons and Daughters of the Clergy. (1845). The New Statistical Account of Scotland: Lanark. Michigan: W. Blackwood and Sons. Shurhuu, D. (2005). China’s new diplomacy and Mongolia-China relations. Berkeley: Institute for International Studies. Silberston, P. Z. (1984). The Multi-Fibre Arrangement and the UK Economy. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. The World Bank. (2003). From goats to coats: Institutional reform in Mongolia’s cashmere sector. New York: WB. Tsedendamba, B. (2002). Mongolia’s Foreign Policy in 1990’s: New identity and new challenges. Ulaanbaatar: Institute for Strategic Studies. Ulan, B. (1999, August 12). The cashmere crash. The Economist. United Nations. (2000). The Mongolian Action Programme for the 21st Century. Paris: UN. Velia, M. (2003). Trade and Investment, Background Briefing No. 4 . New York : Institute of Development Studies. Wallack, R. (2008). Cashmere from the land of misery. Durham: American Association of Chemists and Colorists. Warner, G. (2000). Globalisation of the cashmere industry in Mongolia. Ted Case Studies. Wool and Cashmere Federation. (2003). Worden, R. a. (1989). Federal Research Division Country Study. Washington: Library of Congress. World Trade Organisation. (2004). Textiles trade reform: Unstitched by China. Paris: WTO. Yang, F. a. (2000). The strategic significance of west development. Hong Kong: Economic Selections. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/96262 |