Ong, Kah Weng (2019): THE EFFECTS OF INTERNAL FACTORS AND EXTERNAL FACTORS ON YUM! BRANDS, INC PERFORMANCE.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_97267.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Profitability is a critical viewpoint that in the investigation of the organization specifically Yum! Brands, Inc. The primary objective of this investigation is to decide the effects of internal factor and external factor towards gainfulness or profit for resources of Yum! Brands, Inc. from 2014 to 2018. Subsequently, the investigation shows that current ratio as operational ratio that impacts the productivity of Yum! Brands, Inc. the most along the period 2014 to 2018. This study additionally called attention to the reasonable answers for Yum! Brands, Inc., which are expand ventures by utilizing more money and increment the offer cost by checking organization execution in producing higher benefits.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | THE EFFECTS OF INTERNAL FACTORS AND EXTERNAL FACTORS ON YUM! BRANDS, INC PERFORMANCE |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | ROA, internal factor, external factor, operating ratio, Corporate Governance, company performance |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance G - Financial Economics > G3 - Corporate Finance and Governance > G32 - Financing Policy ; Financial Risk and Risk Management ; Capital and Ownership Structure ; Value of Firms ; Goodwill O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O16 - Financial Markets ; Saving and Capital Investment ; Corporate Finance and Governance |
Item ID: | 97267 |
Depositing User: | Kah Weng Ong |
Date Deposited: | 02 Dec 2019 09:29 |
Last Modified: | 02 Dec 2019 09:29 |
References: | Accenture, (2015), Reaping the Benefits of Operational Risk Management. 1-16. Bank Negara Malaysia, (2018). Credit Risk, 1. Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, (2005), CIMA Official Terminology The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants. Coleman Rodney (2011). Operational Risk. Edgar R. Fiedler, (1971). The Meaning and Importance of Credit Risk. Measures of Credit Risk and Experience, 10-18. Fiedler, R., Brown, K., & Moloney, J. (2002). Liquidity risk: what lessons can be learnt from the crisis in Japan's banking system? Balance Sheet, 10(1), 38-42. John C. Frain, Conor Meegan, (1996). Market Risk: An introduction to the concept & analytics of Value Joseph A. McCahery, Erik P.M. Vermeulen (2014). Six Components of Corporate Governance That Cannot be Ignored. Jun Muranaga, Makoto Ohsawa, (1997), Measurement of Liquidity Risk in The Context of Market Risk Calculation. Ken Brown, Peter Moles (2008). Credit Risk Management, 3. M.Alix Valenti, Rebecca Luce, Clifton Mayfield (2011). The Effects of Firm Performance on Corporate Governance. Management Research Review. 266-283. Mathias Drehmann, Kleopatra Nikolaou, (2010), Funding Liquidity Risk: Definition and Measurement, 1-31. Maria Maher, Thomas Andersson (2000). Corporate Governance: Effects on Firm Performance and Economic Growth. Corporate Governance Regimes: Convergence and Diversity. Mathias Drehmann, Kleopatra Nikolaou, (2009) Funding Liquidity Risk: Definition and Measurement, Journal of Banking & Finance, 2173-2182. Stephen A. Drew, Patricia C. Kelley, Terry Kendrick. (2006), CLASS: Five Elements Of Corporate Governance to Manage Strategic Risk. Business Horizons., 127-138. United Nations. (2003). Selected Issues In Corporate Governance: Regional and Country Experiences. Xhavit Islami; Naim Mustafa; Enis Mulolli, (2018). The Effect of Industrical and Internal Factors to the Firm’s Performance. 154-166. Zahid Irshad Younas, Haider Mahmood & Asif Saeed, (2013). Effects of Firm Performance on Corporate Governance A Panel Data Analysis, Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 1-8 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/97267 |